User talk:Orunab

Intelligent laser speckle classification page

Hello Ahmet, I have done some serious work on the ILSC page, including more in-depth referencing, internal wiki-linking (both in and out) and general wikifying, to save the page. I have also re-uploaded the photos to the Commons with more in depth and correct copyright information. I hope you like how it turned out! Jhill270 (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Onmodel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Onmodel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:OrunAB.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:OrunAB.pdf. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intelligent laser speckle classifier

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Intelligent laser speckle classifier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ILSC.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ILSC.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a PD-self template for you. But I suggest that you send in an email to prove that you are A. B. Orun, rather than someone pretending. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmet Orun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmet Orun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmet Orun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 10:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real life Quantum Experiment (Butter-coin test) (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Real life Quantum Experiment (Butter-coin test) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Orunab, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Real life Quantum Experiment (Butter-coin test)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Real life Quantum Experiment (Butter-coin test), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Orun & Natarajan Satellite Sensor Model concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Orun & Natarajan Satellite Sensor Model, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Orun & Natarajan Satellite Sensor Model concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Orun & Natarajan Satellite Sensor Model, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Orun & Natarajan Satellite Sensor Model

Hello, Orunab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Orun & Natarajan Satellite Sensor Model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:33, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Natural Quantum Communication (in Biology and Chemistry)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Natural Quantum Communication (in Biology and Chemistry) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/optical-engineering/current. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 11:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Quantum Communication (in Biology, Chemistry and Bio-Physics)

Natural Quantum Communication was a discovery (March 2020) demonstrated in a laser-Optic lab by use of quantum Eraser experimental set as particularly designed for chemical reactions' quantum observations [1]appearing in a short time (10-15 min)sequence. The method uses the quantum principle of "wave-particle duality" shifting [2], by which an observation of two (transmittance and receptive) domains made, which demonstrate a Natural Quantum Communication between each other. Such communication would be made either at sub-atomic level (by photons/electrons) or atomic exchange level[3][4]. The observations made by use of Quantum-eraser set (modified version of Mach-Zehnder interferometer) support the Natural Quantum Communication theory, proposing the idea that, there would be an information exchange between the transmittance and receptive domains like; between "medication-diseased organic tissue", "vaccine-cellular substance", or between two chemical substances like "Carbon-Oxygen". By this concept, the theory explains how medication provides curing effect on "diseased organic tissue" via transmitting a complementary quantum information that is normally missing in the receptive domains, called Natural Quantum Communication.

References

[1] Orun, A. and G. Smith, An investigation on a quantum communication phenomenon between sub-atomic properties of substances by Quantum eraser pattern quantification, Optical Engineering, 59(3), 2020. [2] T. Qureshi and M. A. Siddiqui, “Wave–particle duality in N-path interference,” Ann. Phys. 385(2017), 598–604 (2017). [3] G. L. Kellogg and P. J. Feibelman, “Surface self-diffusion on Pt(001) by an atomic exchange mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3143–3146 (1990); Erratum Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 939 (1990). [4] M. Koppa and P. R. Schwoebel, “Direct observation if atomic exchange during surface self-diffusion,” Surf. Sci. 695, 121564 (2020).

Speedy deletion nomination of Natural Quantum Communication (in Biology and Chemistry)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Natural Quantum Communication (in Biology and Chemistry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 00:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Orunab. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Intelligent laser speckle classification, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Intelligent laser speckle classification for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intelligent laser speckle classification is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent laser speckle classification until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You guessed it...

Hello, Orunab. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 20:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXPERT

If you haven't come across it already, you may or may not find this essay helpful. Good luck! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Rockwell B-1 Lancer

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rockwell B-1 Lancer, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 00:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 00:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II. Loafiewa (talk) 01:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have included the reference https://www.ssbcrack.com/2024/02/facts-about-turkeys-5th-gen-kaan-fighter-jet.html

As you may know F-35 has an high crash statistics and not reliable:https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/09/23/400k-helmet-1-7-trillion-cost-and-reliable-half-the-time-f-35-jet/70947552007/

Note: Please accept the Turkish Defense Technology reality, and give up the US Defense's Global Monopoly Orunab (talk) 02:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish TF-X is beyond the F-35

https://asiatimes.com/2022/12/turkeys-tf-x-looks-beyond-americas-withheld-f-35/ Orunab (talk) 02:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orunab, that's weird, because your own source here in the Asia Times clearly says that the f-22 and F-35 are better. --McSly (talk) 02:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II) for a period of 1 month for persistent OR and nationalist boosterism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement. Alin2808 (talk) 23:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added two more articles to your block.If you keep on with jingoist editing, you may be siteblocked. Acroterion (talk) 00:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B-1 Lancer revert

I saw your email, and to respond, check McSly's comment on his revert. It is not relevant to the article whether or not the bomber's altitude is in range of a certain system. Alin2808 (talk) 00:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are opposing my comment about "bomber's altitude is in range of a certain system" but you do not do anything about "aircraft was vulnerable to Soviet air defenses" comment in same page ! What is the reason of such discrimination ? there should be equality. Orunab (talk) 03:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand what the word "relevant" means? Alin2808 (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Scottish it is not objective behavior. This should be everybody's encyclopedia.

Then I stop devoting to Wikipedia. Orunab (talk) 03:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]