Jump to content

User talk:Oltrepier/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Where do you get information added at this page? Transfermarkt cannot be used. Dr Salvus 12:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus: Hello! Thank you for reporting it: I'll be more careful in the future.
Actually, Ervin's brother is still mentioned in the other article that is used all over the page, so I guess I should have kept just that as a reference... Oltrepier (talk) 12:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
How have you got information on his Austria caps? Dr Salvus 12:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus It's the same mistake, actually...
I'll restore that section to the Soccerway data, then.
Once more, thank you for reaching out: I appreciate any type of advice moving forward, as I officially signed up just a few months ago.
~~~~ Oltrepier (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Then, you shouldn't use - in timestamps and in match results. You should instead be using –. 2017–2018 istead of 2017-2018. Then, I'd suggest to crete your own user page, if you want to. Dr Salvus 12:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus Understood. Oltrepier (talk) 12:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
And you should never use contracted forms per WP:CONTRACTIONS. Dr Salvus 12:47, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus I should have just fixed all the errors now.
Huge thanks for helping me out! Oltrepier (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
If you want to include a citation on Austria's player stats use these templates:
The pages also have the instruction to use them- Dr Salvus 10:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much!
~~~~ Oltrepier (talk) 08:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
I appreciate you thanking me for my edits but I don't want to be thanked every time, otherwise it'd be getting tedious. Dr Salvus 14:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
You're definitely right...
--~~~~ Oltrepier (talk) 09:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davide Manarelli has been accepted

Davide Manarelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Storchy (talk) 14:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
@Storchy Hello, thank you for reviewing my draft! I've submitted it because it was my first real attempt at creating an article for Wikipedia's "central" site (I first signed up for the Italian community), so I didn't want to make an unnecessary mess...
Apart from that, whenever you can, I would ask you to review my previous draft, as well, please.
Thank you for your help!
--~~~~ Oltrepier (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
This was your first article creation at English Wikipedia? That's impressive. Wish I could write in Italian as well as you write in English... Storchy (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Actually, I've been using the main editing tools for years, despite signing up just a few months ago, and I've already created two pages on the Italian site, so here's the trick.
I'm still pretty bad at using templates and categories, though...
Thank you for your help!
--~~~~ Oltrepier (talk) 12:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noel López has been accepted

Noel López, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Storchy (talk) 15:18, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Hans Nicolussi

Your edit at that page wasn't very costructive. I've made a partial revert. Then, remember that play-off matches stats aren't included in the infobox. Dr Salvus 12:16, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

That's fine, thank you for clarifying it.
--~~~~ Oltrepier (talk) 12:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giuseppe Ambrosino (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 19:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Oltrepier! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 19:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vittorio Continella (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vittorio Continella (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
QueerEcofeminist🌈 17:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Two amicable notes

As I'd arleady told Coco53, when you create a page on a footballer, you musn't forget to add the year of birth in the short description as I did at Giacomo Faticanti. When you create a page and you manage to write 1500 prose characters within the first seven days, it'd be a shame not nominating the article for WP:DYK (you could publicise your great work at the Main page). Dr Salvus 10:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus Whoops! Thank you for reporting it, I'll make sure to be more careful with it now.
I don't think I've reached that level, yet, but thank you for your advice: I'll definitely consider that opportunity.
For now, though, I've still got problems even with draft articles, so... : D Oltrepier (talk) 11:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Please register to WP:WikiProject Football/Members. Dr Salvus 12:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Try creating Marco Raina, a goalkeeper who was once called up by Allegri, page and getting it to DYK. Dr Salvus 11:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
When you want to use Soccerway, you should use Template:Soccerway, not copy and paste the player's link. Dr Salvus 06:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus Do you mean it for the "Career statistics" section? Oltrepier (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
For everything. Please don't ping me anymore when you write on thia page. I have it in my watchlist. Dr Salvus 10:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Right, thank you for your help. Oltrepier (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommaso Ghirardello has been accepted

Tommaso Ghirardello, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 15:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brody Paterson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Nuamah has been accepted

Patrick Nuamah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul W (talk) 17:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommaso Mancini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campionato Primavera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soumaila Diabate (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorge Cabezas Hurtado has been accepted

Jorge Cabezas Hurtado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Valentín Carboni

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Valentín Carboni you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr Salvus -- Dr Salvus (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Valentín Carboni

The article Valentín Carboni you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Valentín Carboni for comments about the article, and Talk:Valentín Carboni/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr Salvus -- Dr Salvus (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Request

I have a bad fever. Would you care of updating Juventus U23 players' stats after today's match? Dr Salvus 16:56, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Sure.
Is this the page I should update first? Oltrepier (talk) 17:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Yes and look at my contributions. Dr Salvus 17:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus Right, thank you for pointing at it. Oltrepier (talk) 17:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Can they be updated within Sunday? Dr Salvus 19:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
@Dr Salvus Oh, you mean I should have updated each player page, too, right?
Sorry for it... I'll do it as soon as possible. Oltrepier (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Yes but not former players. I want to reiterate that there is no need to ping me. Dr Salvus 19:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Understood, thank you. Oltrepier (talk) 19:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
My mouse is broken and can't do the updates. Can you? Dr Salvus 15:29, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
All done! Oltrepier (talk) 13:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Update. All. The. Players. Dr Salvus 16:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I lost will to bring Serie A Player of the Month to FL status. If you want, you can do it and I'll give you credit. Dr Salvus 20:51, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Please, make the upate on U23 match to Pordenone. I'm too busy. Dr Salvus 23:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
(Outdent) All done now, although I didn't have enough time to update the single players...
I did manage to expand Dean Huijsen's page, though.
On a side note, I think you'd better open a new section when you send me the next message, please, so I can find them more quickly... Oltrepier (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hilmir Rafn Mikaelsson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jay Enem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campionato Primavera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Valentín Carboni

On 3 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Valentín Carboni, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Valentín Carboni played in the same three youth teams as his brother Franco before they both received their first call-up to the Argentine senior national team in March 2022? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Valentín Carboni. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Valentín Carboni), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I've been waiting for this moment, and I hope I'll add some more achievements in the next future. : D Oltrepier (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soumaila Diabate (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HeinzMaster was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HeinzMaster (talk) 07:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Oltrepier! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HeinzMaster (talk) 07:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Excellent work at Draft:Alva Selerud! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
@Spiderone Wow, thank you so much, I really appreciate it! : D Oltrepier (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip

At first, I checked out The Grind Date and I cannot tell a lie, it was a mixed bag. Nice flow, but too many annoying "instruments" overlaid, had to skip some tracks altogether, almost swore them off. But today, And the Anonymous Nobody, whole other story! That's how albums are supposed to be made, if you ask me. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

@InedibleHulk Oh, so you actually listened to De La Soul: great! : )
To be honest, I don't know their discography that well, despite loving their songs: however, I can say that their first albums (especially 3 Feet and High Rising) are widely considered to be their best ones.
I hope we'll manage to fix the pages of each member of the trio sooner rather than later, because it would just give them justice, and especially to Trugoy.
Cheers! Oltrepier (talk) 08:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
For whatever reason, Spotify only has three of their albums (five if you count two remixes). About a dozen singles, though. I'll think about finding more on YouTube or something, but I can't figure out how to keep that playing while doing something more productive than watching the "video" (like improving the members' bios, in theory, no promises). InedibleHulk (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
@InedibleHulk My bad, I forgot to mention: that's because, in recent years, the group has struggled to negotiate with their label over the release of their catalog on streaming services. They either had problems with sample clearances or unfavorable deals that would give them a very low revenue. So, basically, the only two albums they could release and fully benefit from were their last two LPs, which were self-released.
Now, though, it seemed like they finally found an agreement, and the rest of their discography should be released in the next few weeks. Oltrepier (talk) 10:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
  • Germany FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
  • United States TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
  • Byzantine Empire Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included Berkelland LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, New England Trainsandotherthings, England Lee Vilenski, Indonesia Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, Washington (state) SounderBruce, Wales Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and Chicago PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Dean Huijsen

On 7 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dean Huijsen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dean Huijsen went from scoring seven goals in one season for Juventus's under-17 squad to playing for their professional reserve team in just half a year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dean Huijsen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dean Huijsen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeff Wrana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Lucy Salani

On 28 March 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lucy Salani, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 04:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Tobi Oluwayemi

On 29 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tobi Oluwayemi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tobi Oluwayemi and his older brother Josh are both goalkeepers who played for Tottenham's youth academy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tobi Oluwayemi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tobi Oluwayemi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 02:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

DYK for Samuele Parlati

On 8 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Samuele Parlati, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in February 2023, Samuele Parlati became one of the few professional outfield footballers to save a penalty kick while playing in goal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Samuele Parlati. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Samuele Parlati), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Lucy Salani

Hey, since you contributed to the article Lucy Salani, do you think you would be able to vote for it in the Translation of the week project here? If it is chosen, then it will be translated to several other languages. Thank you beforehand and thank you for your work on Wikipedia! Brunnaiz (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

@Brunnaiz Hello! I actually didn't start that translation by myself, but still, thank you for reporting it! Oltrepier (talk) 20:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Taha Ayari

On 18 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Taha Ayari, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Swedish footballer Taha Ayari made his Allsvenskan debut by coming on as a substitute for his older brother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Taha Ayari. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Taha Ayari), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

Your GA nomination of Melchie Dumornay

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Melchie Dumornay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, Chicago PCN02WPS, and London AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Oltrepier! I've addressed your comment in the Bad Cinderella (song) draft. Let me know if there's any concerns!

Thanks --Harobouri🎢🏗️ (he/him) 01:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

@Harobouri Good! I've made just a few minor fixes myself, but I think we're good to go now. Oltrepier (talk) 08:00, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

Monster Max review

Oltrepier, in response to your question on the DYK talk page, once you have proposed a hook for a nomination, you're precluded from reviewing it, since you're not allowed to approve your own hook. As it happens, someone has already reviewed and approved the nomination, so it's fortunately taken care of. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset Hello! That's perfectly fine, thank you for clarifying! : ) Oltrepier (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for creating Jumpei Hayakawa. If you can create these footballers, Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Japan task force#Requested articles, please do it. Cheers. Jumping Frog Man (talk) 08:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

@Jumping Frog Man Hello, thank you for the feedback.
Wow, there are a lot of pages on that list! I hope I'll be able to work on at least one or two of them in the next weeks. : ) Oltrepier (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Ed Frank article

I am moving Draft:Ed Frank to the main space. It looks like you found no errors.

Thank you for your help. Rudypoo (talk) 22:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

@Rudypoo You're welcome! : ) Oltrepier (talk) 07:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vittorio Continella has been accepted

Vittorio Continella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)