User talk:Norbson12

Speedy deletion nomination of DREAMDOLL

Hello Norbson12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DREAMDOLL for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enemies list on your userpage

Hello. I noticed that you have a list of enemies (including a nemesis) on your userpage. I understand (again, per your userpage) that English is likely not your first language, but "enemies" is a rather strong term. Furthermore, such lists are not allowed per Wikipedia:POLEMIC, our community guideline for userpage content. Do you think you can delete your list? Thanks.--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Norbson12, please remove the list of enemies from your userpage. This is now the second time you have been warned. It is against policy to do so, as explained by SamHolt6 above. If you do not remove it, it may be removed for you, and you may be blocked. --Jayron 32 16:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the vile and libelous nature of your personal attacks, I have extended the block to indefinite. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What? Norbson12 (talk) 14:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the vile and libelous nature of your personal attacks, he has extended the block to indefinite. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, no fair Norbson12 (talk) 19:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is fair. You are the person who voluntarily chose to make horrific accusations of criminal misconduct against a fellow editor, without presenting a shred of evidence. That type of behavior simply isn't acceptable on Wikipedia. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:59, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]