Jump to content

User talk:Njsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Njsky!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. All of those pointless edits to your sandbox are disruptive and can be seen as gaming the system. Seawolf35 T--C 09:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GetJet Airlines Latvia moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to GetJet Airlines Latvia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. •Cyberwolf•talk? 13:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You draftified the page about twenty seconds after it was published. I hardly had a chance to add a source before you did so. Njsky (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well its not yet ready to be in the article space yet please dont be discouraged i will help •Cyberwolf•talk? 13:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It qualifies as a stub. Njsky (talk) 13:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Flybondi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Njsky (talk) 05:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- ferret (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Njsky (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm a little shaken to see this here out of nowhere- I haven't edited Wikipedia with any sockpuppet. User:Htamz is my brother, he's also done nothing wrong..... please help Njsky (talk) 01:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:LITTLEBROTHER. Unless your brother successfully contests his block, we'll leave the block on this account in place. Yamla (talk) 12:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help

[edit]

@Ferret, I'm npot sure what i did to get flagged here, but you've blocked me and my brother, I don't understand why... I genuinely haven't used any sockpuppets. I aplogize if I messed something up somewhere but I promise it isn't that... please help! Njsky (talk) 01:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some more stuff

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Njsky (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry for making a second request (im not sure how to edit the first) but i have some more things to say- I do occasionally use a VPN, and my only intention is to contribute to Wikipedia. Njsky (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; do not make multiple simultaneous requests. Yamla (talk) 12:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@User:Yamla I made a second because i dont know how to change the first, sorry…

Family

[edit]

I did not know about WP:FAMILY. I will add the right userbox right away. Njsky (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biting the newcomers

[edit]

@Yamlayour user page mentiones this… my brother has made 5 edits. He did nothing wrong, and his edits have very little to do with my topics of interest. I don’t think he’ll be very interested in coming back now. Thanks. Njsky (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your brother can appeal on his user talk. You can't appeal for him. Even if he's truly your brother and a different individual, it changes nothing about the fact of your own block evasion. It was extremely poorly advised for you to try to introduce your brother to Wikipedia while you yourself are blocked. -- ferret (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But i haven’t evaded any block… what????? I genuinely haven’t, i promise… i don’t know what to say Njsky (talk) 15:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The technical evidence along with the behavioral evidence is so glaringly clear and obvious, along with your exceedingly disruptive effort to game extended confirmed, that I don't even see the point in engaging you further. -- ferret (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]