User talk:Nikejack

Possibly unfree File:APCover11.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:APCover11.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 03:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:APCoverIssue10.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:APCoverIssue10.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 03:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Michael Smith

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Michael Smith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello Nikejack. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nikejack. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nikejack|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Praxidicae, thanks the message. I appreciate you looking out for the site. I can confirm I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for this or any other article, or any edits. I wasn't aware of the 'articles for creation' process, so thanks for directing me to it. Nikejack (talk) 16:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Nikejack, thank you for confirming there is no compensation. However, please could you confirm if you have any connection at all with Nicholas Michael Smith? Thank you. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Kj cheetham, I attended the subject's concerts when I lived in China a decade ago (which is where I sourced the photo). The topic is a personal hobby - I study Chinese, have lived in China (now in the US), and am a retired musician, arts journalist and researcher. China's classical music is poorly documented on Wikipedia (for many reasons but largely the lack of reliable local media sources and few journalists from reliable sources who cover China's music scene except when they tour internationally). This is my first attempt to address some of that gap, but I plan to try fill in detail on existing pages that are poorly written or sourced as I come across them. I hope that answers your question. Nikejack (talk) 17:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Nikejack, thank you for your reply. I was going to ask about the photo, given you marked it as being your own work. I primarily wanted to check if the subject was a personal friend or another connection as per WP:EXTERNALREL, but I'm convinced from your reply they're not. Keep up the good work! -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)