User talk:Godofwisdomlb

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Nabumuseumlb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Nabu Museum, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 07:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Longhair\^talk 07:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Godofwisdomlb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

godofwisdomlb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i understand that there should be no bias commentaries or texts about the museum im writing about

Decline reason:

I'm quite sympathetic to this unblock request, especially if you work for the museum. However, I do want to see that you understand why what you wrote was inappropriate and how you will contribute to this encyclopedia if unblocked. You may find Wikipedia:GLAM/Getting started and Wikipedia:GLAM/Contribute to be helpful in composing your next appeal. MER-C 20:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe other renamers will disagree(in which case, a rename is okay with me) but I'm not sure "godofwisdom" is a good idea. In any event, please describe any association you have with the museum you attempted to write about. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Eh? Sounds a little Kabalistic, or mysterious. Could you clarify your discomfort? Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 17:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I thought it could be offensive to those that are religious or believe in God. As I said, if you don't see a problem, that's good enough for me. 331dot (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty devout, but I see beyond my own culture. Think I'll go for it. And we already have at least one Athena/Minerva. Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 17:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Nabumuseumlb to Godofwisdomlb

globally renamed Nabumuseumlb to Godofwisdomlb Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 17:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have come to this rather late but FWIW I am not comfortable with the new name. It is certainly espousing a religious position which we try to avoid. Just Chilling (talk) 19:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]