User talk:N419BH/Archive 3

Four years ago ...
flights
	... you were recipient; no. 163 of Precious,; a prize of QAI!

This is an archive of past discussions about User:N419BH. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Star Dust GA review

Hi. I agree that an image or two of the crash site or the debris field would be helpful. The only such images I've ever seen so far are non-free material (from books and TV); and since there is already one fair-use image (the photo of the aircraft), I had hesitated to add more. If you think it's really important, though — and especially if you think a photo of the wreckage is essential to GA quality — let me know and I'll see what I can come up with. Richwales (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Let me do a bit of cleanup on the second paragraph of the "STENDEC" section. Richwales (talk) 21:21, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I reworked the paragraph in question, with more cites (and one additional source). I can work on it more if you would like. Let me know. Richwales (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I added another source for the 2000 Argentine air force investigation. This source (The Guardian) is really just an echo of the earlier source (The Birmingham Post, as reported by thefreelibrary.com), but some people might find this new source to be of better quality because the info is from The Guardian's own web site rather than being reported via a third-party site. I've done some searching for the actual Argentine air force report, but so far without success. I'll keep looking. Richwales (talk) 22:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Per your suggestions, I'll keep looking for additional material that might improve this article. Richwales (talk) 23:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I added a photo of the intact wheel found amidst the Star Dust wreckage. This is a screen shot from a TV show, used under a fair use justification — probably the best that can be done, though it's possible (albeit IMO unlikely) that a free photo could be found at some future date. I'll continue to look for a copy of the 2000 Argentine air force report. Richwales (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Tenerife Airline Disaster

You admonishment of my recent activates on the talk page is quite justified, albeit for the wrong reason!

Although I have never had a problem before posting on talk pages (I rarely make changes to articles themselves), somehow I royally messed up after I made my original post regarding the propriety of the alleged ATC cause assertion for the tragic airline disaster at Tenerife. Somehow, I seemed to set the entire section in very small type that was difficult to read and after several efforts I finally managed to change it back to larger type.

Then, you made a comment (which I appreciate and basically agree with regarding your edit on the article). Your response too came up in this very small script (doubtlessly due to whatever the hell I had done to the section!). I therefore tried to enlarge it and didn’t mean to otherwise change it at all. How this collapse function appeared is beyond my comprehension.

Anyway, I finally got your original response back, along with my own comments, in some semblance of order, though still not the way I would have preferred; i.e., standard script. If you can fix this entire mess that I inadvertently made of matters, I’d be beholding to you if you would do so.

As matter stands now, I’m afraid to make a response to you for God only knows what will result within the template! I’m very sorry for this misunderstanding. Under no circumstances did I intend to initiate an edit war with you or anyone else.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

All you have to do is indent your post with one more colon than mine and you can respond just fine. I think I've fixed all the formatting. What was missing was a </small> tag at the end of your comment. N419 BH 18:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

--Thank you. I appreciate it! Best regards.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Barts1a

User:Barts1a told me to complain to you about him on his Yell page. So I'm doing so. He's harassing User:AndTheGrump in spite of his claim that he's trying to stay away form contentious pages. AndyTheGrump's user talk page is a contentious page and Barts1a is fanning the flames rather than being helpful.

128.59.171.194 (talk) 20:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Investigating. N419 BH 21:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Turns out that IP was violating an AE block on a fringe topic ban... Probably won't be such a crazy idea to remove this now... Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 06:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Eh, it'll archive. I stand by my advice. If things get contentious it's sometimes a good idea to sit back and let others handle it. N419 BH 06:40, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Season's tidings!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC).

Barts1a

Barts1a is under an editing restriction on noticeboards? Are you aware of the content dispute at Michael (album) over whether this album is considered a studio or compilation album? Please see this discussion at ANI.[1] A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 01:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, have looked in to it and made a couple comments. N419 BH 17:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, N419BH, I appreciate it. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Potential issue with your advisee

I understand you are the mentor/advisor to User:Barts1a. If so, please be aware of the thread dated today on my talk page. Regards, AGK [•] 01:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Ping

As noted on my talk page, I've emailed you. Cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Barts1a Dispute

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I am currently in a dispute with Barts1a on his "complaints page" and depending on how he responds to me next, you may need to be there. His last reply to me was not really that civil and you may need to be there. Thanks. Hghyux (talk) 01:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Your mentorship of me

Due to recent events I have decided to no longer be under your mentorship. I feel that you just don't have the patience to handle mentoring. Barts1a / What did I actually do right? / What did I do wrong this time? 22:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Replied on your talk. N419 BH 06:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Long overdue

The Patience of Job

You have a couple of orders of magnitude more patience than I do. Since the recipient of your time and effort and good faith apparently doesn't have the grace to do it himself, I salute your effort; it was a nearly impossible task you set for yourself. Perhaps, with time, they will realize that they would long ago have been indef blocked were it not for you. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		Mentorship is a tough business, especially when you and your protege disagree. Mentors often don't get the credit they deserve. I may disagree with your take on the situation and its subsequent handling but you've done some great work here and it shouldn't be ignored. I wholly agree with the award above and would like to add this barnstar as an accolade Worm^TT · (talk) 08:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Page Triage newsletter

Hey guys!

Thanks to all of you who have commented on the New Page Triage talkpage. If you haven't had a chance yet, check it out; we're discussing some pretty interesting ideas, both from the Foundation and the community, and moving towards implementing quite a few of them :).

In addition, on Tuesday 13th March, we're holding an office hours session in #wikimedia-office on IRC at 19:00 UTC (11am Pacific time). If you can make it, please do; we'll have a lot of stuff to show you and talk about, including (hopefully) a timetable of when we're planning to do what. If you can't come, for whatever reason, let me know on my talkpage and I'm happy to send you the logs so you can get an idea of what happened :). Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage newsletter

Hey all!

Thanks to everyone who attended our first office hours session; the logs can be found here, if you missed it, and we should be holding a second one on Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. I hope to see you all there :).

In the meantime, I have greatly expanded the details available at Wikipedia:New Page Triage: there's a lot more info about precisely what we're planning. If you have ideas, and they aren't listed there, bring them up and I'll pass them on to the developers for consideration in the second sprint. And if you know anyone who might be interested in contributing, send them there too!

Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

help triage some feedback

Hey guys.

I appreciate this isn't quite what you signed up for, but I figured as people who are already pretty good at evaluating whether material is useful or not useful through Special:NewPages, you might be interested :). Over the last few months we've been developing the new Article Feedback Tool, which features a free text box. it is imperative that we work out in advance what proportion of feedback is useful or not so we can adjust the design accordingly and not overwhelm you with nonsense.

This is being done through the Feedback Evaluation System (FES), a tool that lets editors run through a stream of comments, selecting their value and viability, so we know what type of design should be promoted or avoided. We're about to start a new round of evaluations, beginning with an office hours session tomorrow at 18:00 UTC. If you'd like to help preemptively kill poor feedback, come along to #wikimedia-office and we'll show you how to use the tool. If you can't make it, send me an email at okeyeswikimedia.org or drop a note on my talkpage, and I'm happy to give you a quick walkthrough in a one-on-one session :).

All the best, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Free State Project

It may sound fringe to a casual reader, but the FSP has been a moderately high-profile part of state life for a while. It's certainly as notable as the state flower or something like that! - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

A big NPT update

Hey! Big update on what the developers have been working on, and what is coming up:

coding

Fixes for the "moved pages do not show up in Special:NewPages" and "pages created from redirects do not show up in Special:NewPages" bugs have been completed and signed off on. Unfortunately we won't be able to integrate them into the existing version, but they will be worked into the Page Triage interface.
Coding has been completed on three elements; the API for displaying metadata about the article in the "list view", the ability to keep the "patrol" button visible if you edit an article before patrolling it, and the automatic removal of deleted pages from the queue. All three are awaiting testing but otherwise complete.

All other elements are either undergoing research, or about to have development started. I appreciate this sounds like we've not got through much work, and truthfully we're a bit disappointed with it as well; we thought we'd be going at a faster pace :(. Unfortunately there seems to be some 24-72 hour bug sweeping the San Francisco office at the moment, and at one time or another we've had several devs out of it. It's kind of messed with workflow.

Stuff to look at

We've got a pair of new mockups to comment on that deal with the filtering mechanism; this is a slightly updated mockup of the list view, and this is what the filtering tab is going to look like. All thoughts, comments and suggestions welcome on the NPT talkpage :). I'd also like to thank the people who came to our last two office hours sessions; the logs will be shortly available here.

I've also just heard that the first functional prototype for enwiki will be deployed mid-April! Really, really stoked to see this happening :). We're finding out if we can stick something up a bit sooner on prototype.wiki or something.

I appreciate there may be questions or suggestions where I've said "I'll find out and get back to you" and then, uh. not ;p. I sincerely apologise for that: things have been a bit hectic at this end over the last few weeks. But if you've got anything I've missed, drop me a line and I'll deal with it! Further questions or issues to the usual address. Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 17:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash

Good to see anyone taking on such a topic. I would just point out, however, that (a) Your comment that the lead should in no case contain citations is not regarded as best practice, and I would urge you to reconsider your removal of all the citations from the lead on a controversial article, perhaps adding a couple back again after your rewrite, which I support; and (b) said removal broke several other citations, so it would be worth your taking five minutes to fix that. Regards, - Jarry1250 ^{[Deliberation needed]} 17:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks...I thought I had gone through and moved citations that were used elsewhere out of the text...I will go back and fix. Obviously I was misinformed on my last GA review which said I should not have citations in the lead. Thanks again! N419 BH 18:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello N419BH/Archive 3! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

N419 BH 21:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

New Messages

Hello, N419BH. You have new messages at Hghyux's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

N419 BH 21:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Just a Quick Thank You

I absolutely love your vandalism definition page. You're like a truly legendary legend. Oops (sorry, couldn't resist). Thank you for helping editors understand vandalism in Wikicontext. I am dealing with one to whom you posted; I think (s)he's a knowledgeable, passionate editor and could be a great one, but any disagreement is "vandalism". Your page really helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Last1in (talk • contribs) 21:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

New Pages update

Hey N419BH/Archive 3 :). A quick update on how things are going with the New Page Triage/New Pages Feed project. As the enwiki page notes, the project is divided into two chunks: the "list view" (essentially an updated version of Special:NewPages) and the "article view", a view you'll be presented with when you open up individual articles that contains a toolbar with lots of options to interact with the page - patrolling it, adding maintenance tags, nominating it for deletion, so on.

On the list view front, we're pretty much done! We tried deploying it to enwiki, in line with our Engagement Strategy on Wednesday, but ran into bugs and had to reschedule - the same happened on Thursday :(. We've queued a new deployment for Monday PST, and hopefully that one will go better. If it does, the software will be ready to play around with and test by the following week! :).

On the article view front, the developers are doing some fantastic work designing the toolbar, which we're calling the "curation bar"; you can see a mockup here. A stripped-down version of this should be ready to deploy fairly soon after the list view is; I'm afraid I don't have precise dates yet. When I have more info, or can unleash everyone to test the list view, I'll let you know :). As always, any questions to the talkpage for the project or mine. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage prototype released

Hey N419BH! We've finally finished the NPT prototype and deployed it on enwiki. We'll be holding an office hours session on the 16th at 21:00 in #wikimedia-office to show it off, get feedback and plot future developments - hope to see you there! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 03:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage/New Pages Feed

Hey all :). A notification that the prototype for the New Pages Feed is now live on enwiki! We had to briefly take it down after an unfortunate bug started showing up, but it's now live and we will continue developing it on-site.

The page can be found at Special:NewPagesFeed. Please, please, please test it and tell us what you think! Note that as a prototype it will inevitably have bugs - if you find one not already mentioned at the talkpage, bring it up and I'm happy to carry it through to the devs. The same is true of any additions you can think of to the software, or any questions you might have - let me know and I'll respond.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal

Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1059 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention.

Do you have what it takes?

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
Are you (at least) autoconfirmed?
Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Click here to review to a random submission_{Article selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver.}

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial.

On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
AndrewN ^talk 23:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones

Hello, N419BH. You have new messages at Gareth Griffith-Jones's talk page.
Message added 18:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have a reply for you. Please leave a note there, when you have read it. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

I have edited the IP's Talk page, and I have replied to your second posting on my Talk page. Kind regards, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 22:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Postscript: I have another comment & question for you. Best wishes, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 08:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation. Kind regards, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 19:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the Template

Thanks for the template on My Talk Page. I happily stole it from you without regret or any chance of apologies. !!!!! :)--Morning277 (talk) 14:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Precious

	flights
	Thank you for airborne heights of perspective, especially for the amazing story of continuing to fly against all odds, and to do so in a light poetic flight, - in other words: you are an awesome Wikipedian (27 July 2010), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! N419 BH 18:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Response

Hello. I left a response about the article 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash as you suggested on the talk page. Regards Voyt13 (talk) 16:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Recent Edit

Excuse me, you have a right to edit the page as you see fit, but you do not have a right to tell me what is "constructive" or "true". Those are in the opinions of the reader. In my opinion, as well as many other Americans, The supreme court, especially Mr. Roberts, has caused major destruction to our national constitution, and set us on a path toward socialism. If they will not protect us from socialism, then I will let my opinion be known in any way shape or form. This includes my right to change information on Wikipedia to be the "truth in my eyes". Wikipedia is an opinion based site and not a facts base site. While it is best for those opinions to be backed by facts, I feel that my opinion on the Chief Destroyers title is correct and backed up by facts when you analyze Mr. Roberts and other former Chiefs rulings in crucial constitutional cases. I will continue to edit the information on these pages to be more "constructive" and accurate to the eyes of many Americans. Thank you for your concern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porter.mike44 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Pillar 5: Rules in Wikipedia are not carved in stone, as their wording and interpretation are likely to change.

You do not own this site nor the information. I will work within my power to block your ability to edit this information as well if you continue to send threatening messages to me.

As I stated before, if you see something that you do not agree with, you may make changes. DO NOT tell me what is right and wrong. WIKIPEDIA is a place for freedom of speech. If you want to write "accurate" and "constructive" information that cannot be edited by people at will, then write your own books, etc. and get them published. WIKIPEDIA is viewed by those of us in the Educational Institutions to be a very unreliable source of information, as most of the information is highly biased to protect liberals and their agenda. You sir are not the GOD of WIKIPEDIA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porter.mike44 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Also your use of the word vandalize would be incorrect in this setting. According to WIKIPEDIA's definition of vandalism on their site, it is any act that is done that is intentionally destructive to the site. Well my friend, my information is not intended to be destructive to the site, rather, it is to be an enlightenment to the viewers of the site who might have the same views, but are not as willing to freely express themselves. So please know the rules, before you try and use them against someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porter.mike44 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Accident

No way... It not say that pilots dont do go around. We dont know why airplane dont go around. Procedur was done in 100 m. AMSL but pilots didnt had time to go around. It not fault of them but wrong procedures of airfield and airfield dont have runway safety area — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.146.5.184 (talk) 21:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Greetings from Wales

[[|left|thumb|A Tiger Moth flies underneath a bridge on the under-construction M40 in 1968 for a live-action stunt from the film Thunderbird 6.]]

Wishing you a (belated) happy Independence Day!

Hello again!

Seeing this photo' earlier this morning, made me remember our meeting.

Hope all is well over there with you, and a (belated) happy Independence Day! Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Page Triage newsletter

Hey all. Some quick but important updates on what we've been up to and what's coming up next :).

The curation toolbar, our Wikimedia-supported twinkle replacement. We're going to be deploying it, along with a pile of bugfixes, to wikipedia on 9 August. After a few days to check it doesn't make anything explode or die, we'll be sticking up a big notice and sending out an additional newsletter inviting people to test it out and give us feedback :). This will be followed by two office hours sessions - one on Tuesday the 14th of August at 19:00 UTC for all us Europeans, and one on Wednesday the 15th at 23:00 UTC for the East Coasters out there :). As always, these will be held in #wikimedia-office; drop me a note if you want to know how to easily get on IRC, or if you aren't able to attend but would like the logs.

I hope to see a lot of you there; it's going to be a big day for everyone involved, I think :). I'll have more notes after the deployment! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 20:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

New Pages newsletter

Hey all :)

A couple of new things.

First, you'll note that all the project titles have now changed to the Page Curation prefix, rather than having the New Pages Feed prefix. This is because the overarching project name has changed to Page Curation; the feed is still known as New Pages Feed, and the Curation Toolbar is still the Curation Toolbar. Hopefully this will be the last namechange ;p.

On the subject of the Curation Toolbar (nice segue, Oliver!) - it's now deployed on Wikipedia. Just open up any article in the New Pages Feed and it should appear on the right. It's still a beta version - bugs are expected - and we've got a lot more work to do. But if you see something going wrong, or a feature missing, drop me a note or post on the project talkpage and I'll be happy to help :). We'll be holding two office hours sessions to discuss the tool and improvements to it; the first is at 19:00 UTC on 14 August, and the second at 23:00 on the 15th. Both will be in #wikimedia-office as always. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 15:40, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash

You might wanna have a look at: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Robert Warren. noclador (talk) 18:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Mailcall

I've dropped you an email. Worm^TT(talk) 16:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Worm! N419 BH 19:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter

Hey N419BH. This will be, if not our final newsletter, one of the final ones :). After months of churning away at this project, our final version (apart from a few tweaks and bugfixes) is now live. Changes between this and the last release include deletion tag logging, a centralised log, and fixes to things like edit summaries.

Hopefully you like what we've done with the place; suggestions for future work on it, complaints and bugs to the usual address :). We'll be holding a couple of office hours sessions, which I hope you'll all attend. Many thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter - closing up!

Hey all :).

We're (very shortly) closing down this development cycle for Page Curation. It's genuinely been a pleasure to talk with you all and build software that is so close to my own heart, and also so effective. The current backlog is 9 days, and I've never seen it that low before.

However! Closing up shop does not mean not making any improvements. First-off, this is your last chance to give us a poke about unresolved bugs or report new ones on the talkpage. If something's going wrong, we want to know about it :). Second, we'll hopefully be taking another pass over the software next year. If you've got ideas for features Page Curation doesn't currently have, stick them here.

Again, it's been an honour. Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Important information on 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash

Traces of explosives (TNT and Nitroglycerin) on the wreck
Proposal IV
Voyt13 (talk) 11:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

This is not a newsletter

This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Naming the deceased crew of flight incidents

Is that really precedent? Is there an explanation as to why? (In reference to the Air Florida article you edited) 67.137.68.210 (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

The short answer to your question is it's a gray area. There is no specific policy that I am aware of, but please have a read of our policy on biographies of living persons (we don't really have a specific policy on biographies of deceased persons), in particular the sections on individuals notable for only a single event and names that haven't been widely disseminated. Note that National Transportation Safety Board accident reports intentionally edit out pilot names from public documents. Really the issue is the names of the pilots and flight crew typically aren't notable in their own right. If the name isn't notable in its own right, naming it really doesn't make much sense. Consider the surviving family especially in context: the NTSB has blamed errors on their loved one's part for causing a crash that killed nearly 80 people. Additionally, especially in accidents caused by pilot error, naming the crew and saying things about them, even if sourced, could cause legal problems for Wikipedia. We can just as effectively refer to the flight crew as "Captain" and "First Officer" and relay the same meaning.

With that said, it is a gray area, and I will give you the example of our article on UAL 232. The flight crew survived that accident and WP:BLP fully applies. However, the crew involved in that accident became famous in their own right, and we don't only name them in the article on the accident, we have stand-alone articles on two of them: Al Haynes and Denny Fitch. AWE 1549 is another example, and we have a full article on Chesley Sullenberger. I hope that helps, and I wish there was something concrete I could refer you to one way or the other, but unfortunately there is not. N419 BH 15:56, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Precious again

flights
Thank you for airborne heights of perspective, especially for the amazing story of continuing to fly against all odds, and to do so in a light poetic flight, - in other words: you are an awesome Wikipedian (27 July 2010),

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 163rd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eye4talent

Hello N419BH. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Eye4talent".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eye4talent}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —rybec 01:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Believe this to be in error. N419 BH 22:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

I had renamed the draft, which had been at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/E4talent2010 (Second submission). Does that sound more familiar? —rybec 22:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Check the contribution history if you have access to it. I used to evaluate submissions at WP:AFC so the most likely scenario is the page was created in an improper location by someone else and I had an admin move it to the project space. My last edit before today was 2012 so I kinda doubt I made something in the past six months like the template says. N419 BH 22:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

It says it's been more than six months. I can't see the history, but I'll leave a note for the Twinkle programmers. —rybec 22:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

posted at Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle#possibly_erroneous_notification —rybec 22:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Precious again

flights
Thank you for airborne heights of perspective, especially for the amazing story of continuing to fly against all odds, and to do so in a light poetic flight, - in other words: you are an awesome Wikipedian (27 July 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were the 163rd recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Greetings!

Gareth Griffith-Jones – The WelshBuzzard – is wishing you the season's greetings.
Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's solstice or Christmas,
Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus,
or the Saturnalia,
this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.

I have edited the entry for The General Board of Discipleship to update organization's name change. It officially became Discipleship Ministries in March 2015.

How does the headline on the page (which still reads: The General Board of Discipleship) get updated as well?

Thanks.

Tom GBODtom (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UA232precrash.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UA232precrash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Precious again

flights
Thank you for airborne heights of perspective, especially for the amazing story of continuing to fly against all odds, and to do so in a light poetic flight, - in other words: you are an awesome Wikipedian (27 July 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Three years ago, you were the 163rd recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fairchild Dornier 428JET.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fairchild Dornier 428JET.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

... eight years now --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)