User talk:Mrsblink182

Welcome!

Hello, Mrsblink182, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Brian 18:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Gurg

The merit of this subject to the encyclopaedia was discussed by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurg. If you wish to dipsute that result there is a deletion review process, in the mean time I have redirected Gurg to Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Guy 10:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Understudies

A tag has been placed on The Understudies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why The Understudies is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on Talk:The Understudies, explaining how The Understudies is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (aeropagitica) 10:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Sketch with Kevin McDonald

An editor has nominated the article Sketch with Kevin McDonald for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sketch with Kevin McDonald. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Sketch with Kevin McDonald during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 22:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comedians on MySpace

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Comedians on MySpace, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Cream147 07:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vanier College Productions

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Vanier College Productions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 17:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Zedlacher

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Pete Zedlacher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Myers (actor)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as you did to Mike Myers (actor). This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sketchy at Best

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sketchy at Best, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Sketchy at Best. slakr^\ talk / 21:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janet van de Graaf

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Janet van de Graaf, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. triwbe (talk) 05:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heidi Foss

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Heidi Foss, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV writer

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tikiwont (talk) 09:30, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Luciano Casimiri"

A page you created, Luciano Casimiri, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Adun12 (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mrsblink182! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tim Progosh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kristeen von Hagen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bruce Sweeney - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Doug Morency - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chris Finn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jo-Anna Downey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peter McBain - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pete Zedlacher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Debra DiGiovanni

The article Debra DiGiovanni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. THF (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristen Pontisso

The article Kristen Pontisso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A good-faith web search (see Talk:Kristen Pontisso#Notability) for coverage of the subject of the article in published independent, reliable sources yielded evidence only of directory-level coverage or passing mentions, and not of significant coverage. In the absence of such coverage, the subject does not appear to meet the general notability guideline for inclusion. In addition, based on the available, verifiable information about the subject, the subject does not appear to meet any of the topic-specific alternate indicators of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 01:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randy Metson

The article Randy Metson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of a 16-member team who collectively won an award. No evidence or indication of notability on his own.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 12:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ron Sparks (comedian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Firm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Downtown Comedy Festival

The article The Downtown Comedy Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short-lived, non-notable event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 02:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Corey Mystyshyn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corey Mystyshyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Mystyshyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 03:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]