User talk:Mayommugezi

Mayom Mayom Atem is well simply knowns by his stage as " Mayom Mugezi", is a South sudanese born on 15 December 1997 in Ayai ) part of Northern Bhar El Ghazal region

Machar Control

Garang Dhal Mathiang Deng is well known by his stage as "Machar Control", is a south Sudanese artist who was born on 03 April 1996 in Panthou, Aweil south county, part of Northern Bhar el Ghazal Aweil.

July 2020

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mayom—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia, Applemusic, Facebook and Instagram are not reliable independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mayommugezi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mayommugezi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Machar Control moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Machar Control. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larson Angok moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Larson Angok. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 15:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Larson Angok has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Larson Angok. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayom Mayom Atem (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mayom Mayom Atem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Baqi:) (talk) 13:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayom Mayom Atem (November 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No evidence of notability. Vanity autobio self-promo.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bior Ajang moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bior Ajang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and The sources are not of the quality required for a biography of a living or recently deceased person.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 16:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larson Angok (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources provided don't verify any of the information. For instance, the sentence "In 2018, he joined Stafford International University for his law's degree and graduated in 2022" cites this source, a press release from 2021. How could that possibly verify information about what he did in 2022? All three sources are about one event, and none of them indicates notability (and that's apart from the fact that the information in the draft isn't mentioned in the sources).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Larson Angok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bior Ajang (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draftified for improvement, but immediately submitted without any changes. Three sources, all of them obituaties and two of them personal memorials/testimonials which should not be used as sources. Please see WP:NOBITS for some guidance on the usefulness of obituaries as sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bior Ajang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mayommugezi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deng Deng (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FuzzyMagma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deng Deng and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Mayommugezi, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mayommugezi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Larson Angok for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larson Angok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larson Angok (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 13:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Machar Control (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any changes after draftification.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Machar Control and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 10:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Larson Angok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wau. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art, Music and drama (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art, Music and drama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 12:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Hilary Okello moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hilary Okello. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art, Music and drama (December 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The topic is presented in a misleading way – the draft is not in fact about a university or college called "Art, music and drama". I think the idea is to write an article about art, music, and drama as academic fields of research and education, but that's not what the draft discusses, and that topic is already covered in separate articles about these topics – it makes no sense to discuss them together.

The claim about what "most of the public universities in the world" recognise borders on nonsensical (I guarantee that the subjects are not recognised as an institution of higher education anywhere), and the "usefulness" list is original research supported by irrelevant and/or unreliable sources.

bonadea contributions talk 15:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deng Deng Hoc Yai (December 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by FuzzyMagma was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: please stop!

FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Hilary Okello

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Hilary Okello requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bior Ajang moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bior Ajang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Please work on the existing draft at Draft:Bior Ajang.. When you believe that draft is ready, submit it for review again. Do not move it back or create another version in article space. bonadea contributions talk 10:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024 2

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Bior Ajang, you may be blocked from editing.
When a draft has been declared inadequate, and has been declined, please do not move it into mainspace - I have returned it to being a draft - Arjayay (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. bonadea contributions talk 10:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tut Kew moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tut Kew. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]