User talk:MEXDOOMER1

XHPBPE-FM moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, XHPBPE-FM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

XHPBJR-FM moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, XHPBJR-FM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

XHSJR-FM moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, XHSJR-FM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 19:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XHPBPE-FM (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reliable secondary sources that have written in-depth about the station. Existing is not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XHPBPE-FM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MEXDOOMER1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XHPBJR-FM (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reliable secondary sources that have written in-depth about the station. Existing is not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XHPBJR-FM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Radio station articles and sourcing

Hi! I'm Sammi Brie, and I created most of Wikipedia's infrastructure about Mexican radio in the middle of the last decade.

I wanted to explain something that may not be immediately apparent to a new editor: We have too many station articles. A 2021 proceeding tightened the sourcing requirements for radio stations to require significant coverage in reliable sources. This is going to be difficult on two fronts for a lot of Mexican stations:

One is understandable. There is little newspaper or pre-internet sourcing available for stations that existed prior to 2000. I'm willing to excuse this because in some cases notability comes from age in radio. (This is why I work on American stations for Good and Featured Articles; this paper is much more available.)
The other is much harder to overcome. Stations created in the last 10 years (e.g. out of IFT-4 or IFT-8) generally will not have quality sourcing. There are, of course, exceptions (XHCSAG-FM), but in my experience, the source quality comes down to some blogs, etc. I've also seen some low-tier news outlets regurgitate stories from others. These are the more clear-cut cases where articles should be switched to redirects.

This is the reason that your drafts are being rejected. It's also a problem affecting US small-market radio and TV stations basically on a rolling basis. The best practice would be to redirect call signs of clearly non-notable stations to the state list. You'll notice some state lists I got around to reformatting (Querétaro is one of these) to remove the "many separate tables" style adapted from the Spanish Wikipedia. The inclusion of name and format lines is partly to make state list redirection a more viable option for Mexican radio stations. The others should adopt this format, too.

If you have questions—in English or Spanish—don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:XHPBJR-FM

Hello, MEXDOOMER1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:XHPBJR-FM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:XHPBPE-FM

Hello, MEXDOOMER1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:XHPBPE-FM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:XHSJR-FM

Hello, MEXDOOMER1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:XHSJR-FM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XHPBJR-FM

Hello, MEXDOOMER1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "XHPBJR-FM".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XHSJR-FM

Hello, MEXDOOMER1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "XHSJR-FM".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]