Jump to content

User talk:Littlemslawandorder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to wikipedia! I left you a note at request for feedback. Contact me if you need help or have any questions (by clicking on "talk" in my signature).--Physics is all gnomes (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery solved, see request for feedback :) --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 22:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Just saw your message on the request for feedback board. I moved your article to U.S. Ordnance as that fits the naming conventions and seems to be the most widely used. Your original title, and US Ordnance, now redirect there. If you know of any other commonly used alternative names, you can turn them into redirects by creating that page and adding just the text #REDIRECT [[U.S. Ordnance]]. (see Wikipedia:Redirect for details). --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That is much better. The only other ones are usord, usordnance maybe. But less important I think. Thank you for the tips and help though. Littlemslawandorder (talk) 20:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mk43 machine gun article

[edit]

I left some comments on the Request for Feedback page. I always find these articles interesting and useful additions to an encyclopedia. That article needs, like you say, some more sources and a little editing, but its a great start. Tkotc (talk) 05:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mk43 Machine Gun for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mk43 Machine Gun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mk43 Machine Gun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:10, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MK43Editorial.pdf

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MK43Editorial.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mk43 Machine Gun, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Spring 2009 issue of Small Arms Defense Journal, copywritten by Chipotle Publishing, LLC (uploaded at File:MK43Editorial.pdf, also a clear copyright violation), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mk43 Machine Gun saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Can't you just help me make it a better article instead of just nominating the entire page for deletion? Wikipedia is extremely difficult to use and I am very computer savvy. I want to learn how to do it right. Littlemslawandorder (talk) 19:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mk 48 machine gun isn't really a good "role model" to work of off. It could use some work (such as referencing, as you noted), and really ought to be merged to the M249 article anyway. There was a suggestion on the talk page to do that a couple of years ago, but it was never followed up on (if you feel like it, you can take that project on, see WP:MERGE). You shouldn't assume that simply because it exists on Wikipedia means that it's good; problems go unnoticed for a long time on occasion (for a good example, see the Seigenthaler incident). If you're anxious to get editing before the AfD is closed, the best place to do so would be at M60 machine gun, which we both agree could use work. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 20:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How to attribute public domain text

[edit]

Hi. :) The copyright concerns with the article above have been addressed, and our copyright policies have been explained to you. I'm just dropping by because I think based on your ntoes that part of the article is also copied from U.S. Ordnance Spec Sheets. This is not a copyright problem, because although many nations retain copyright in federal works, the United States does not. (See Wikipedia:Public domain.) We can use that content, but if you have copied from it directly it's not enough to just cite your source, you have to acknowledge that direct copying. This keeps us compliant with the guideline at Wikipedia:Plagiarism.

The easiest way to do this is to use the proper attribution template from Category:Attribution templates. There are a bunch of them related to the U.S. government (Category:United States government attribution templates) because there are so many departments. It can be difficult to find the precise one you need since currently half of them have obscure initials. I'm slowly converting them all to human-understandable names. :D If you can't find anything better, Template:US government works. If that doesn't work for some reason, you can come up with your own using that as a basis.

I would ordinarily help out here by tagging, but I can't find the source online so I'm not entirely sure that the section is copied. If it is, and you want help placing that attribution template, please leave me a note here and just give me a nudge at my talk page to make sure I don't overlook it. I'll be happy to give you a hand.

(Just FYI, Wikipedia:Copy-paste briefly summarizes various points about reusing previously published text. It's a good kind of primer, which includes links to various policies and guidelines.)

Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I have just received permission from the publisher of the article, so I can at least upload it now correct? Littlemslawandorder (talk) 18:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on where the permission is. If it is placed on their website, then, yes, we can. If they sent it via e-mail, it has to be forwarded to the Wikimedia Foundation at the address in the notice above. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:M2HBEditorial.pdf

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:M2HBEditorial.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, it has been up for years and I got permission from the editor. Can I just email her and get a broader release? Why is Wikipedia so difficult to use?! Littlemslawandorder (talk) 17:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:NNBW USO.pdf

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:NNBW USO.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reticulated Spline (t • c) 17:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Littlemslawandorder&oldid=635532982"