User talk:Kstephent

Welcome!

Hello, Kstephent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JoJan 20:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. JoJan 20:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amerianada

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive).

howch e ng {chat} 20:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for thinking this was a joke article. However, a micronation in and of itself is not notable enough for an article. If the information can be verified from reliable sources, then please be sure to cite those sources when you re-create the article. Sealand and the Gay and Lesbian Kingdom of the Coral Sea Islands are two examples of micronations that received widespread press coverage, which is why those articles are allowed to stay. However, if your intention is to publicize Amerianada, then please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, specifically, "Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine." On that page, it also states that "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information," and therefore your feeling that "Wikipedia is a place where we can share information, on everything appropiate" is not necessarily true. Lastly, articles should be able to stand on their own merits. If you can't finish it all in one go, please start it as a user subpage (for example, User:Kstephent/Amerianada and then move it to Amerianada when it's ready to go. Hope that helps. Regards, howch e ng {chat} 21:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Niagara and Western New York Railroad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niagara and Western New York Railroad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niagara and Western New York Railroad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]