User talk:Kindly Copyeditor
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kindly Copyeditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 17:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to If Love Were All seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Position of quotation marks
[edit]Hello, thanks for your edits to Harold Arlen. However, Wikipedia uses logical quotation, in which the position of punctuation before/after quotation marks depends on whether the punctuation is part of the quoted text. For song titles, it isn't, so I've undone your changes involving quote positioning. Graham87 08:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
your edit to From the Land of the Moon (film)
[edit]Just FYI, you made an edit a few months ago for style and clarity [1] but you inadvertently changed the meaning to something incorrect. I partially reverted your edit [2]. The César awards are not affiliated with the Cannes film festival. Mathew5000 (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for your kindly copyedits.
NotYourFathersOldsmobile (talk) 23:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC) |
British English
[edit]When an article is about a British topic, whether or not it has the template {{Use British English}}, please don't turn British spellings such as "honours" into American spellings like "honors" as you did at Sean Shibe (which already had the UBE template, to avoid any confusion). Thanks. PamD 23:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Kindly Copyeditor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Could you possibly
[edit]...look in on the Elif Shafak article, with your copyediting prowess? It is a mess, mostly for academic honesty issues (much content placed without sources, many superscripted inline citations placed end of pargraph not covering most of paragraph, etc. But in addition to these hard edits that need plenty of time, there are many other issues in the article, including the same accolades/activities appearing over and over again. I have fixed some of this, but there is more to be done. (I added [needs copy edit] tags to the repeating cases I noticed.) On top of this, there is the broader issue of what goes where—choosing once and for all which one section to put the mention of the accolade, rather than repeating it in the several sections, in prose and list, as is happening now. Cheers, and best wishes (from this long-time academic editor, that chooses not to log). 67.167.8.141 (talk) 08:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi both, I have been adding citations to every sentence with the [citation needed] note kindly added in December 2019; and will continue with the few left. I have been thinking on one of those sentences: "Her novel Three Daughters of Eve (2017) set across Istanbul and Oxford, from the 1980s to the present day, is a sweeping tale of faith and friendship, tradition and modernity, love and unexpected betrayal.[according to whom?][citation needed]" Would it be ok to cite the book itself? This is what the book is about. Another template is this:
 | This section's chosen set of quotes and review materials is unbalanced to the degree that it appears promotional; as such it contains promotional content. (December 2019) |
The quotes are from articles published at rooted international media by well-known critics. It is not wise to call the work of critics as promotional, I believe. We do not conduct surveys to analyse books, media and critics are the sources of information....
Does these make sense?--Askolsun (talk) 06:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Kindly Copyeditor, I noticed the Elif Shafak article has been reverted to an old version including the author photograph [1]. I wanted to check with you if this happened accidentally. I may agree some parts of this article sounds biased. Editing the content is beyond my capacity so I limited myself with supplying references to dependable sources -most of them being official websites-. I am extremely disappointed with the result. Can you think of a solution to this problem? Askolsun (talk) 01:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
