User talk:Jens1917

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jens1917, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 14:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jens1917. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
Message added 15:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Drmies (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am completely confused by the deletion review process. I have been involved in a discussion over the deletion of the page on the International Communist Current. I took some of the points to heart, produced a completely new version of the page, and participated in the deletion review process. As far as I can see, that discussion has disappeared and my own new version has also been deleted with no explanation as to why the page is inadequate. I would like to follow Wikipedia standards but a) I am confused as to exactly what to do, and b) I get the impression that another editor has an axe to grind about the page existing at all.

The discussion is still open and can be found here. The initial article was deleted through consensus determined through a community discussion. Rather than taking some of the points to heart and recreating the article, the appropriate response would have been to open up a discussion at deletion review, presenting the reliable sources and content that supports notability. When you recreated the article, it was appropriately deleted as a recreation of a page that had been previously deleted per a deletion discussion. The discussion can be found here. At this point, I recommend that you create a subpage: User:Jens1917/International Communist Current. Work on the subpage to develop the article. Once you have met the notability criteria for organizations, i.e., significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of International Communist Current, along with its employees, affiliates, and partners, submit it to the Articles for Creation team for review. You will need to specifically state the ways in which previous issues that have been addressed. If you have additional questions, feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 11:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contribution to the International Communist Current page. I have attempted to develop it somewhat. The behaviour of Sherlock Holmes Fan is not consistent with wikipedia policy and I am confident that we shall reach a more measured way of dealing with the variety of views as regards this page. I have restored your material and added procedural information on the ICC talk page.Leutha (talk) 12:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#International_Communist_Current.Leutha (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]