Jump to content

User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8→Archive 10

Nomination for deletion of Template:Suicide City

Template:Suicide City has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Accept the Gift of Sin

No need - since it was just a redirect, the article itself remains in the history. You can find the text at the most recent revision prior to the redirect - here. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I've not really had a chance to have a look for any information- I will hopefully find some time eventually. J Milburn (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

List of accidents and incidents involving airliners by airline

Do you intend to complete splitting this article? Op47 (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Reply - Yes!--Jax 0677 (talk) 21:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
When? I note that you have carried on editing like this in December. I further note that when I and others have reverted you per WP:BRD you have reverted and demanded that your sub articles be taken to AfD. AfD is not the forum for determining this sort of thing. I did not revert your edits with the intention of doing nothing but to discuss the way forward since I have great reservations regarding your strategy and especially with the timescales that you are adopting. I agree that some articles it is a no brainer that a long list should be split by letter. I do not understand why when you start editing an article like this you cannot finish the article. I am sorry to say, but I find your current methods tendentious and disruptive. I would appreciate it if you would at least complete those articles that you tagged in November before starting to split any other articles. I would rather work with you rather than against you, but that is not possible with your current methods. Op47 (talk) 18:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Reply - OK, to the extent that I can recall which articles I split, I will try to work on articles that I split in November, to the extent that the community desires splitting, if it is simple to split. On articles such as Arab Spring, the community wanted a split. I made a split on Arab Spring which has been reverted, so I left "split-apart" tags on the articles while giving up on splitting the rest. I will try to assume that from here on out that "no consensus" to split means that the article does not get divided at this time.--Jax 0677 (talk) 20:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I am relieved to hear that. Regarding recalling which articles you have split, I think you may need to re-visit then following:

Arbitrary section break


Arbitrary section break

Regarding "to the extent that the community desires splitting", if there is overhwhelming desire to split then yes the comminity probably desires a split. If there is no reply though then that may just mean people were not available to look at your proposal and when they come back are very shocked to find the article cut up. I would certainly try be tolerant of people in those situations.
Personally, my intrest in this is because I have been monitoring the list of articles with split tags and trying to sort them out. My policy has been to leave a clear month between a tag being placed and doing anything (e.g. If a tag is placed in January, I wait until March to do something). Even then I get people who complain for one reason and another. Usually they quickly sort things out. If you did the same then I think people will start to see you as being more reasonable. Not only that, but I will be there to give a second opinion and do some of the splitting. I think it would also be useful not to be ">100Mb police" about it. There are some articles that nomatter what will be >100Mb. As was pointed out, it is advice not a mandate. If you look on my talk page you will find some advice that SilkTork gave me. In particular, any split off article should be independently notable.
You may notice that I split off List of Asilidae species. I am not saying it is perfect, but there are a few points that you may want to look at:
  • The edit summaries clearly say split. I am very surprised that patrollers don't try to speedy delete you more often.
  • The scheme considered the topic at hand. For a long itemised list like this then I think it is worth splitting by individual letter. In this case, the original auther started like that. If its the name with small amount of text such as tv character lists then maybe plitting by chunck would be a better idea.
  • Each page has a pointer back to the parent article and a list of the other articles in the set. With hindsight, I should have created a template rather than cut and paste. You live and learn
Also, I did not mention it on AfD because it may sound snide, but when you did this article originaly, you lost all of the entries begining with L. You would be well advised to check that the other articles in the list are complete before putting them to bed.
re "if it is simple to split" if an article is not simple then would you put it back and then maybe I wil have a look? Sometimes a split is not the answer. There are other people who would help as well.
I hope this all helps. Op47 (talk) 23:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Post to prevent automatic archiving at this time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Post to prevent automatic archiving at this time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Post to prevent automatic archiving at this time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Post to prevent automatic archiving at this time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Post to prevent automatic archiving at this time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Post to prevent automatic archiving at this time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply - All articles that I proposed for splitting have been dispositioned. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Against All Will

Template:Against All Will has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Savages (album) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Savages (album). Since you had some involvement with the Savages (album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Samsides13

Yes that page should well be split it is huge great idea get back to me if it happens ss 11/04/13 17:10

==Sam sides Thanks for the welcome message i will hopefully contribute to the wikipedia world and fight against vandalism definately and also hope to speak to you soon--Samsides13 (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Sam sides

Thank you for the welcome message hope to hear from you soon--Samsides13 (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Against All Will The Drug I Need Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Against All Will The Drug I Need Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Against All Will All About You.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Against All Will All About You.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Please...

Why this redirect so close after removal? The Banner talk 16:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply - Per this article, "Appropriate redirects from the subject's name and entries in disambiguation pages should be created to help readers find such information." Additionally, redirects are cheap. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
But even cheap redirects can create an image of gaming the system! The Banner talk 17:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply - That is what the title is, and it is not a disambiguation page. On what specific grounds is the redirect objectionable? --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Gaming the system. The Banner talk 23:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply - The AfD says "The result was Speedy Deleted under A9. Album titles are generally redirected to the artist, so putting a redirect here is logical. If you wish to discuss the redirect, you may wish to head over to Redirects for discussion." Thank you! --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Requests for improvement

Sorry to be so harsh, but quality prevails. The Banner talk 13:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply - I have taken the following actions

  1. Removed entire tours section from "Template:Cavalera Conspiracy"
  2. "Template:Uproar Festival" was up to date at the time that I created it. If I am responsible for keeping the navbox up to date for an indefinite period of time, please show me where it says that this is the case, as I do not believe that I am responsible for this task.
  3. Because others have edited the articles within "Template:Against All Will", I have placed "merge to" tags on Wilson, TDIN, AAY and AR&R to assist in reaching consensus . I did not write Cello Dias. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Officially there is indeed no need to maintain a page/template/category you have created. But often the original author is supposed to give some extra care to his own creations. On the other hand, it is good to know that you don't care about your older creations. The Banner talk 22:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply - "There is a very simple solution to all that: Change it! All you have to do is to click "edit", make the necessary changes, and save the changes, writing in the edit summary that you are updating the information. If you do not wish to make the effort to do that yourself but you know it needs to be done, you can also place {{update}} on the top of the page of section. To consider a page for deletion on the basis that it is not up to date is to demolish the house while it is being built." --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Stop splitting articles!

Please stop splitting articles its irritating to those who want to view a single page instead of a messy list of fragments many of the articles you split were better off as a whole instead of having heir information scattered Irishfrisian (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply - I have conferred with the WP community before splitting the articles that I divided. Also, please read WP:CIVIL. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jax 0677. You have new messages at Darkwind's talk page.
Message added 13:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Done! —Darkwind (talk) 13:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:IC listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:IC. Since you had some involvement with the Template:IC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 11:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:Ic listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Ic. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Ic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 11:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:Nf listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Nf. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Nf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 11:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Yahzarah

Template:Yahzarah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Flynn Adam

Template:Flynn Adam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Neelix (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:Dnbtu listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Dnbtu. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Dnbtu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 22:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

2010–13 NCAA conference realignment

I recently saw that you have been splitting off sections of this article into their own individual articles. Do you think that you could help split off the men's and women's ice hockey section as well? I think that and the remaining major FBS conference sections (e.g. ACC, Pac-12) are noteworthy enough to deserve their own articles. There are also a few other lengthy sections (e.g. WCC, Patriot, Big Sky) that could be considered as well. Finally, I feel that DII and DIII should be lumped together in an article and split, as well as softball and wrestling (maybe in a "minor sports" article). Oneforfortytwo (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply - I think that splitting off the largest sections first where possible is the best approach in this case, as these are most likely to be notable. We can discuss on the talk page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Albums and stubs

Hallo, yesterday I stub-sorted all the Aria albums you'd labelled as stubs, irritated each time by having to move {{stub}} away from the wrong place you'd put it (it goes right at the end, per WP:ORDER). I wondered whether they were really stubs, but decided that as they had no critical or "reception" content I'd leave it. Definition from WP:STUB: "A stub is an article containing only one or a few sentences of text that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion."

Today I notice you've labelled a group of Joan Armatrading albums as stubs. The first one I look at, Joan Armatrading (album), is not a stub. It has a lot of content, including a "reception" section. The second one ... Me Myself I, OK, just about a stub. But please put the stub tag in the right place, and don't tag articles as stubs if they aren't. Thanks. PamD 08:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

And Walk Under Ladders already had {{1980s-pop-album-stub}}: adding {{stub}} was totally inappropriate as it just wastes the time of stub-sorters. I can see it's easy to just paste a chunk of usually-right stuff into a batch of articles, but please take more care. Thanks. PamD 08:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Sorry about that Pam. I will try to take more care in the future. --Jax 0677 (talk) 10:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Triumph Group for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Triumph Group, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triumph Group until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

re: the Deriek Crouse redirect

Hello, Jax 0677. You have new messages at Ixfd64's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unnamed Section

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Skier Dude's talk page.

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Overview of the Arab Spring, Jax 0677!

Wikipedia editor Gareth E Kegg just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Amazing work, you still need to sort out ref tags though.

To reply, leave a comment on Gareth E Kegg's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Egypt Central

Template:Egypt Central has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Color Me Badd

Template:Color Me Badd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Arkaea

Template:Arkaea has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Londonbeat

Template:Londonbeat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Beyond Fear

Template:Beyond Fear has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Blood Has Been Shed

Template:Blood Has Been Shed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Smokey's Haunt

I see that you created the Smokey's Haunt article as a redirect to the Urthboy#Albums section last November. Since there's actually a section for Urthboy#Smokey's Haunt (2012) and that is more relevant, I've amended the redirect to point there. I was wondering whether either of you might be intending to turn Smokey's Haunt into a full-blown article, as you'd marked it as "temp" in the edit summary. Someone ought to, but I thought you might have an interest. —sroc (talk) 14:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anata

Template:Anata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Analog Rebellion

Template:Analog Rebellion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Amenta

Template:The Amenta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uncollapse

Template:Uncollapse has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vincennes University

Template:Vincennes University has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:University of Northern Iowa

Template:University of Northern Iowa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Template:Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:IPFW

Template:IPFW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jerry Jeff Walker

Template:Jerry Jeff Walker has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The U-Men

Template:The U-Men has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bad Azz

Template:Bad Azz has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposal: topic ban for Jax 0677 regarding templates

FYI: the proposal is filed here The Banner talk 15:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

To make sure: you are free to inform your friends to take part in the topic ban discussion at WP:AN. The Banner talk 15:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

How did you get power on wikipedia?

Hey I notice their is allot of vandalism, and like you guys I wanted to collaborate on making Wikipedia a better place. How can I get started?

--PirateBlast (talk) 02:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply - I am not too familiar with this page, but you might visit WP:GOCE to find out more about copyediting. I hope this helps. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Question

Why would you place a template noting that an editor was a new user on the talk page of an editor who registered in December 2012 and has nearly 3000 edits? --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply - Sorry bout that. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

And this one? What criteria are you using to determine whether an editor is a new user prior to tagging user pages? --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply - Sadly, if the talk was short, I tagged them as new. Perhaps I should only START talk pages with tianu and wtw. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Having a short talk page is not necessarily related to how long someone has been around. I would suggest not tagging any pages at all until you can come up with a reliable method for checking how long an editor has been around and how many edits they have made. Even then adding a template as a header on another editor's userpage seems....ill advised. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 01:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Hmmm, another problem with accuracy and policies, Jax? Are you trying to get a second topic ban? The Banner talk 03:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Banner, don't you think coming down on me like a ton of bricks every time I make a mistake is getting just a little out of hand? My proposal now is to check for edit histories less than one month before posting Template:wtw on someone's talk page. Thank you Ponyo for bringing this to my attention! --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Help

Dear Jax 0677, thank you for the post. Exactly true, I am already struggeling. I created my first article about a company. I checked the pages [D. Medical Industries] [Motorex] and [Synthes]. I wrote the article in a similar manner, now another user:INeverCry deleted it. It was just written that the article violetes (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion).and nothing else. Is now the whole work gone? What can I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichelleLily14 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Reply - Don't forget to sign your posts. Also, you can ask the closing administrator to place the article in your user space where you can work on it until it is ready to go to main space. You may wish to read WP:IDEALSTUB to get an idea of the minimum that an article should contain before going to main space. I hope this helps. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Help 2nd - Sorry I was so upset because of the article. Many thanks, for the help. I have my article back in my sandbox. Where can I post it that other useres check it if it is ok now? --MichelleLily14 (talk) 07:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC) Reply - I'll quote what another user told me months ago in archive 1 of my talk page:

WP:Your first article is a good guide worth studying, and so is the WP:FAQ/Organizations.

After adding sources, I suggest you ask for comments at WP:Requests for feedback before moving the article back into the main encyclopedia. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

List of Train Songs: Removed Article Size template

Hi, Jax 0677: I am writing to inform you that I have removed the Article Size template from the List of train songs article. I've posted an explanation of the grounds for removal on the article's Talk page. I would appreciate your feedback, including any objections you may have. Thanks. Allreet (talk) 16:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Exhorder

Template:Exhorder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Addison Road

Template:Addison Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 14:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Stars Go Dim

Template:Stars Go Dim has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 14:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hail the Villain

Template:Hail the Villain has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 14:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Digital Summer

Template:Digital Summer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aranda

Template:Aranda has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spitfire

Template:Spitfire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E.

Template:Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 00:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Robbie Nevil

Template:Robbie Nevil has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 00:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:All Shall Perish

Template:All Shall Perish has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 00:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:INOJ

Template:INOJ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 09:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Scary Kids Scaring Kids

Template:Scary Kids Scaring Kids has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 09:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Arson Anthem

Template:Arson Anthem has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jocelyn Enriquez

Template:Jocelyn Enriquez has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Digable Planets

Template:Digable Planets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Quad City DJ's

Template:Quad City DJ's has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:U.P.O.

Template:U.P.O. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tag Team

Template:Tag Team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Threat Signal

Template:Threat Signal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bloodsimple

Template:Bloodsimple has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Machines of Loving Grace

Template:Machines of Loving Grace has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:69 Boyz

Template:69 Boyz has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:95 South

Template:95 South has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hi-Five

Template:Hi-Five has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Utah Saints

Template:Utah Saints has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S.O.A.P.

Template:S.O.A.P. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sheriff

Template:Sheriff has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Trixter

Template:Trixter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rozalla

Template:Rozalla has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Corina

Template:Corina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Frozen Ghost

Template:Frozen Ghost has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 13:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mohammed Rafi

Template:Mohammed Rafi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows

Template:Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Team Sleep

Template:Team Sleep has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Art of Dying

Template:Art of Dying has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677/Archive_6&oldid=1083600160"