User talk:A154
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Iylaq! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 03:10, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Ok thank you Iylaq (talk) 11:15, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maysun bint Bahdal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Asid bin Kurz al-Bajali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Notability is not inherited.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 16:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Asid bin Kurz al-Bajali for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asid bin Kurz al-Bajali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Onel5969 TT me 20:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Husayn ibn Numayr al-Sakuni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sakun.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
I've fixed it. is that correct? Iylaq (talk) 13:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mus'ab ibn Umayr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CE.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Does that mean I'm guilty? thank you Iylaq (talk) 06:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Your actions were against policy, see WP:3RR. You were no more at fault than the other party but they had a dynamic IP, so it was difficult to communicate with them. On another occasion, try to discuss the issues on the article talk page or on the user's talk page. If they then continue, report them at an appropriate noticeboard or seek page protection as appropriate. In this instance, you can make a comment on the edit warring noticeboard if you wish. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Oh I'm sorry I only reverted anonymous edits because I really don't like their edits Iylaq (talk) 09:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Edit warring at Qutayba ibn Muslim
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 16:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oh I'm sorry I only reverted anonymous edits because I really don't like their edits Iylaq (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- There is nothing in the WP:Edit warring policy that allows you to revert anonymous editors without penalty. EdJohnston (talk) 03:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm JellyMan9001. I noticed that you recently removed content from Al-Baraʼ ibn ʽAzib without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. JellyMan9001 (talk) 03:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello regarding the reason I removed it because the content has references to shianews.com and al-islam.org. and that if you are a Muslim and understand the history of shia that the shia is a different group from islam from its teachings for example in their book it is stated that their imams are more important than prophets and angels, then they have taqiyyah teachings that is if they are with other shia groups , in terms of worship they will be the same. but if they (Shia) are with the Sunni group then they will hide their teachings or in other words they will adapt it. and so does the shianews and al-islam websites, if you look at the websites they are shia. namely from the side of the name then look at the article, for al-islam if you look at the article they mention figures such as Husayn and after mentioning their name for the Shia after their Husayn name (Shia) add the title a.s. This is an excessive respect for the Shia even those who worship it. So the conclusion is that the Shia are heretical and different from the teachings of Islam. and if you can speak Indonesian I will give a reference that the al-islam.org website is a shia website. if you can't then you can translate it from Indonesian to English. and also the Shia like to curse the companions of the Prophet, the Ummahat al-Mu'minin. thank you Iylaq (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Al-Baraʼ ibn ʽAzib, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. JellyMan9001 (talk) 16:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
I've given the reason Iylaq (talk) 02:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Task force
[edit]Maybe you interested to join Wikipedia Muslim history task force? Ahendra (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ahendra: hello, sorry for my delay in replying, well, looks like i can't participate because first i don't speak english very well and secondly i'm not very active in english wikipedia. sorry if my answer is offensive. Iylaq (talk) 03:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- no problem, bro Ahendra (talk) 05:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
in some of your contributions, for example the article Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, you provide Indonesian references. Can you speak Indonesian? Iylaq (talk) 03:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
yes, its my first language afterall, thats why i can provide many references from Indonesia language sources, Indonesia is Muslim majority, so its academic community also influenced by Islam more or less Ahendra (talk) 05:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
January 2022
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spider-Man in film. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @InfiniteNexus: Ok, i'm sorry. I want Spider-Man 4 Tobey Maguire and The Amazing Spider-Man 3 Andrew Garfield. Yes? Ok? 😁? Iylaq (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Amr Bin Ma'diyakrib
[edit]Hello, can you help me to crosschecking the Arabic language references in Amr ibn Ma'adi Yakrib? particularly regarding the poetry section, in case there's something ive missed some reference which related with Amr bin ma'dikarib. Ahendra (talk) 04:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
@Ahendra: Hi Ahendra, I'm glad you contributed a lot to Islamic articles. I'm very sorry if something is wrong, and I'm also sorry for not answering your message. I admit that what caused me to be late in answering was my laziness. actually I can inform you whether it can help or not, but I postponed it because of my laziness. I regret. I am sorry. and another reason also because I'm not very active on enwiki. Iylaq (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- ah im very sorry for late repply... dont worry.. im also glad for your help, bro Iylaq... in fact, i also busy somewhere too hahaha Ahendra (talk) 16:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
No problem and okay 👍 Iylaq (talk) 07:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Qurayba bint Abi Quhafa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article was created by banned user SheryOfficial (SPI for Mohhsiinn; SPI for 119.63.138.105) and any edits by other users were purely cosmetic. SheryOfficial is an LTA who cannot be trusted to act in good faith. Unless someone is willing to verify the given information in the sources cited, the article should be deleted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
@Apaugasma: I think it should be removed because the article al-Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn al-Hakam, which was also created by that user, was already deleted by another user. Iylaq (talk) 11:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Ubayd Allah ibn Abbas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article was created by banned user SheryOfficial (SPI for ShabberMojtaba; SPI for 119.73.112.214 and 119.63.138.181) and any edits by other users were purely cosmetic. SheryOfficial is an LTA who cannot be trusted to act in good faith. Unless someone is willing to verify the given information in the sources cited, the article should be deleted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
@Apaugasma: I think this article should also be deleted because the content can be said to be minimal, for example the year of his death is not mentioned in the article, and his son's wife is also not mentioned in the article. Iylaq (talk) 11:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Iylaq, great that we agree then! The article will be deleted by an admin if no one opposes the proposal. If you wish, you can make the admin's work easier by endorsing the proposal for deletion: just add {{Proposed deletion endorsed|comment=A comment}} to the pages, filling in your own comment for "A comment". Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
@Apaugasma: Okay Iylaq (talk) 06:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim ibn Uqba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byzantines. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Okay A154 (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)