User talk:Heraldsun

November 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Melbourne Grammar School, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to David O'Connell (footballer). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 08:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Melbourne Grammar School, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Grammar School

The content is well-sourced. Talk to The Age about it. They are the ones who published the information. Jim1138 (talk) 08:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David O'Connell (footballer). Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You add unsourced information, then add an wp:edit summary of undid revision, anecdotal evidence See wp:verifiability Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to your latest edit summary - there are multiple sources, all cited.--Cahk (talk) 09:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Streisand effect? Jim1138 (talk) 09:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed.--Cahk (talk) 09:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]