User talk:HandwrapTony

Welcome!

Hello, HandwrapTony, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Keith Terceira, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ravenswing 02:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keith Terceira

The article Keith Terceira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After stripping out many unreferenced statements -- and others that weren't backed up by the sources cited -- this is all we're left with. A News search turns up some blog articles written by the subject, but even if there weren't a complete lack of significant coverage ABOUT the subject (as the GNG requires), that wouldn't sustain notability, and there's no evidence he's written in the mainstream boxing press.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 02:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]