User talk:Hadžija/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Hadžija/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 20:17, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)

Instrukcije

Hey Estavisti. I trust you know more about Yugoslavia than I do, but I noticed you blanked the page for Instrukcije. If you think the article should be deleted (I have no idea if it's legitimate or not), you might want to post it on Votes for Deletion. Thanks. -JJLeahy 04:39, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla

OK, So what is it with you! I'm trying to be as neutral and polite as I can, not to bring up any more contraversy then there is, but you insist on reverting Nikola Tesla to be ONLY Serbian-American inventor, do you have any kind of Croatophobia??! Are you ashamed of your ancestors or what?! Vladimirko 19:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my reaction, but some of reverts (not done by you) have made me realy mad! I'we seen that you moderated some excesive changes, and thank you for that... Could there be an agreemant made to leave out any geographical, nativity and/or national reference in an opening article! Vladimirko 19:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mihailovic page

Hey. I think you might have gone a little bit too far in excising the contributions made by Bosniaco to the Mihailovic article. For the most part they were well written and rebalanced the POV. In any case, we should try and come up with some kind of agreement on how to incorporate his changes into the article rather than simply removing them. --tracer_bullet 15:01, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Serb portal

Of course, I like the idea! Sooner or later, Serbs are definitely going to have their portal on en: - only question is when. I'll talk with the guys both on IRC channel (visit sr: IRC), and on our live meetings, to see who is interested, and in which way can help. Only problem is whether we have reached "critical mass" of users to start it just now. -- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 23:17, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I saw that you have informed some other users from SCG about your idea. You missed to contact Zocky, who is one of the most active users on en: from Serbia (he lives in Slovenia) -- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 23:17, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to setup Serbia and Montenegro portal (as a country portal). It seems that Zocky has been away for a while, though, but I am sure he'll help when he's around, and let you guys know. --Dejan Čabrilo 00:57, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, let's wait for a while and see how many people will participate. Though, I strongly urge to create Serbia and Montenegro, instead of just Serbia portal. There isn't much good in alienating people from Montenegro :) --Dejan Čabrilo 01:00, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree and want to participate in that portal. Дошло време да се окупимо --Sasa Stefanovic 03:11, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the idea. However, I don't think that SCG portal is better then Serbian. There is a sense to make Serbian (language based or ethnical), ex-YU (similar cultures) or Serbia, Montenegro and RS/BiH (ethnical), or for ex-SC speaking people (language based), but SCG portal is nowhere (because there is no SCG nation). --millosh (talk (sr:)) 03:46, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The more the marrier. If there is enough folks to create something like "Western Balkans" portal, I'll go with that. However, I have a strong feeling that Serbian Portal will soon become Serbian Orthodox Christian Portal. Besides, at least I can't really contribute much to "Serbian Ethnic" portal, as I don't know much about Serbian ethnicity. Also, Serbia and Montenegro is one country (at least, for now), which would cover politics, culture, geography, etc. --Dejan Čabrilo 04:21, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian portal would naturally include everything about SCG so your knowledge will be useful there. And why excluding Montenegro? Nikola 16:31, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Wikipedia didn't become "Serbian Orthodox Christian Wikipedia" and there is no reason that some Serbian Portal becomes "Serbian Orthodox Portal". (Or you think that it is necessarly that Croatian Portal would become "Croatian Catholic Christian Portal" or that Bosniak Portal would become "Bosniak Sunite Muslim Portal"...?) Serbian culture (as well as in the sense of ethnicity) exists, but SCG culture doesn't exist. (It seems that you know a lot about SCG nation...) And I don't think that SCG geography is so much relevant to make portal only about that. Montenegrin culture exists, too; but I don't think so that cultures (as well as politics) from Serbia and Montenegro are more related then cultures (and politics) from Serbia and RS/BH; etc. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 07:25, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Cultures from Serbia and Montenegro" is relevant term as "Cultures from the northern part of USA" is. Montenegro and Serbia have different politics; cultures and languages in SCG are cultures and languages of Balkan... So, the idea of "SCG national portal" is relevant only to US foreign policy. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 07:25, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So, we need at least two portals. One Serbian and one wider (ex-YU, ex-SC, Balkan...?). However, if you really want to make SCG portal, you have my support because I think that all people should have portal where they can talk even about US foreign policy related to SCG. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 07:25, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a hard question, because a SCG portal would be pretty much useless unless it included the Serb Republic, the history of Serbs in Croatia/Hungary etc (i.e. unless it was a de facto pan-Serbian portal). Personally I think an ex-YU portal would make more sense but I doubt any other group (Croats, Slovenes) would want to be grouped together with Serbs/Yugoslavia (their loss...). However, there's no reason not to sound them out. BTW, if I don't reply for a while, it's because, with my customary bad timing, I made this proposal two days before going away for a month --estavisti 11:00, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The idea is nice, though I myself don't use portals much. But now when I'm looking at this palestinian portal I like it very much :) I'm not sure I could do it though. If/when it is done, I also think it should be Serb portal, not SCG portal. Nikola 19:33, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so if "Serbian ethnic" portal was created, which topics would it cover? --Dejan Čabrilo 07:12, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Same topic as other portals. Introduction, featured article, article of the week, portal news, categories... Nikola 16:31, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I've been on a vacation. Naravno da želim srpski portal. --Dungodung 07:13, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Sorry, I have been absent for a month. --Ninam 00:45, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK I give a full support. Couple of days ago I suggested the same thing on Serbian wiki not knowing it's being discussed in here. I gave some examples of what we should be taking as a good example. I'll just copy paste it in here.

Палестина - веома прегледно, кратко и информативно. Постоји мали текст о Палестини, издвојени чланак је о Јасеру Арафату, Најважније вести (не километарске као на британском), Да ли сте знали?, нешто о култури, википројекти и листа ствари које можеш да урадиш како би побољшао чланке везане за Палестину. Оно што им фали у односу на друге је издвојена слика и листа категорија а и одељак о историји још није завршен. Такође исувише је мрачан (но ипак бољи од нападно-комунистичког кинеског :)).
Израел - све што сам добро рекао за Палестину + све што сам рекао да тамо фали овде постоји. Мислим да Палестина једино води по избору чланка. Арафат јесте тај који вам прво падне на памет док за Универзитет у Хаифи (изабрани чланак из. портала) нисам ни чуо. Такође одељак вести само наводи изворе али не и саме вести. Тако да мислим да би комбинација израелско-палестинских портала била одлична за нас.
Аустралија - врло информативан на малом простору. фале информације о култури и историји али то је ваљда повезано са државом.

Вреди погледати:

I think Israeli one is the best except of the news part. Anyway like I wrote in Serbian I think the combination of Israeli and Plaestine portals would be the best solution.

[[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 13:51, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Come all and see how i make portal SCG on sr: wiki, i copy postal Israel. --Sasa Stefanovic 02:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia and Montegro articles

Hi, I see you're in the category for those Wikipedians from Serbia & Montenegro. I'm trying to create a project whereby seperate articles for just Serbia OR Montenegro are written to an acceptable level, especially considering the possibility that 2006 may see the two nations seperate and become independent states. If that were to occur Wikipedia should have articles written to the standard of other national articles. It would be useful to have the input of Wikipedians living in the area. Please post any views here, not at my talk page. Thank You Grunners 18:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3RR on History of Republika Srpska

You've violated the WP:3RR policy today on this article. I'm going to give you a warning here but that's a blockable offense and if you make another revert I'm going to think very hard about a short block. Please, stop reverting....at this point the word usage needs to be worked out on the talk page. Rx StrangeLove 00:42, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Premestanje clanaka

Primetio sam da si nekoliko clanaka (na primer Njegosa ili Karadjordjevice) premestio tako sto si isekao tekst iz poslednje verzije clanka i nalepio ga negde drugde pa zamenio redirektom. Molim te, nemoj to da radis! Postoji funkcija move koju za to treba koristiti kad god je moguce, jer se kad se clanci pomere na taj nacin cuva njihova istorija dok ako se to uradi ovako kako ti radis ona nije vidljiva. Ukoliko nije moguce pomeriti clanak na taj nacin, mozes napraviti zahtev na WP:RM i neko od administratora ce ga pomeriti.

Hoces li da napravis zahteve za sve clanke koje si tako premestio? Nikola 22:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Glad you liked the business about Tall Slavs. To be honest with you, I'm only talking from about 70% experience - my biggest ambition is to silence my Dutch friends who think that people from Southern Europe MAINLY Yugoslavia are ALL shorties... all right, these Dutch lads are big but I know that down the Balkans - they are the biggest. Now I'll tell you where I have been and where I havn't within that region...

Pljevlja, Bijelo Polje, Savnik and Zabljak plus villages - these I'd say are NORTH and not WEST as such.... they are mostly HUGE

Niksic - not particularly tall though a few

Podgorica, Cetinje, Danilovgrad - quite short really, like Belgrade if that (but I kept quiet there) the coastline - not much different to Podgorica

Berane Rozaje Ivangrad etc (east) - short I am afraid to say...

Trebije - ABSOLUTELY HUGE

Dubrovnik - Bigg-(ish)

Split - A bit bigger...

...on the whole, I thought Northern Montenegero did it BUT...here is where I havn't been (yet): Kolashin, Herzeg-Novi, Ulcinj and Bar (on the coast, I've been to Tivat and Budva only)...

Dubrovnik, yes - Neum - yes, Split - yes , north of Split, they tend to shorten again... it's wierd but I am interested, can you please tell me the towns where MonteHerzegoCroatoSerbos (or whatever) are actually tall... I'll then do research!

BTW, I'm told they are larger than life in Croatian Lika, both Croats AND Serbs - is this true? I havn't been there yet...Celtmist

...if you could, I'd love that - to upload the map.... any way you can point out exactly which regions are tall? I mean I never understood, north-western Montenegro - it is diamond shaped, so there can only be north, south, east west and central - no north west or south-east! or did you mean NORTH plus WEST? and which is Old Herzegovina? and does the southern strip mean Split? or just the part south of Neum, Bosnia? I guess 185 is allright, probably a bit below average as so many blokes there from your way are over 2 metres... Celt

Serbophobia

Unfortunately I didn't quite understand you objection in your edit comment. Please restate it more clearly, in talk:Serbophobia page, without reference to antisemitism. mikka (t) 03:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well, other "pseudophobia" articles must be fixed as well. I doubt that someone was treated from Russophobia in a psycho clinic. As for "seriously", I hope my recent additions show that this word is used very seriously. Unfortunately I cannot write more without original research. mikka (t) 04:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mihailović

Ne očekuj da ću da revertujem stvari koje Bosniac napiše. Zapravo, trebalo bi puno toga što je on dodao uključiti u članak. --dcabrilo 08:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dragoljub Draža Mihailović

Hi. I am sorry but currently I am much to busy in the real world to take care of this. Fixing the page moves was about as much Time as I could spend recently. Hope ChrisO or another admin takes care of it. Good Luck -- Chris 73 | Talk 12:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mlogo bre jezika govoriš

Uh bre, što si izobrazovan. Kolko jezika samogovoriš!... Mlogo bre, mlogo. Samo ti je u glavi jedna jedina pamet, ona srpskog nacionaliste koji slaže čim otvori usta.--Tomahawk Cheerocky 15:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Da, htio sam te obavijestiti da si nacionalista. Ali nakon ovog tvog pisanja moram te o još ponečemu obavijestiti. Prvo kao nacionalistu. Točno je to da u nekim mojim selima nema još električne struje, ali ima svjetla, pa noću spavamo, a danju gledamo. A znaš zašto u tim mojim selima nema struje? I to u selima čiji su, što bi tvoj srpski dio rekao načalnici, svoje akte osim hrvatskim pisali još i latinskim jezikom. Zamisli, u jednom bihaćkom selu gdje nema ni struje upis u zemljišne knjige obavljao se latinskim jezikom 1400 i neke godine. Ali tad dođoše tvoji pretci, oni isti koji su se prije petnaestak godina povampirili, i na čelu sa svojim vojvodom koji je daleko dogurao uzevši tursko ruvo na sebe i postao Hasan-paša Predojević, dakle dođoše oni, ti tvoji pretci i njihove gazde Turci i iskopčaše nam struju na pet stotina godina. Ali eto, neki moji latinski polupismenjaci sačuvaše listine latinske i horvatske pa znamo tko smo i što smo, kao i to da nam je Bihać početkom 16. stoljeća brojao 10 tisuća muških glava i tri biskupa u njemu sjedila i Petar Zoranić (vjerojatno) uživao plodove prvog južnoslavenskog romana. Onda kad je kod tebe cvjetala Resava, i nekoliko stoljeća prije nego će Vučina takav jezik kakvim se ti ispražnjavaš uzdići na pijedestal najmodernijeg narodnog jezika i odrezati vas od vlastite civilizacije. Sve prosto, ali nije čisto, jest jasno, ali smrdi, jer izmetine se ne pokrivaju niti uvijaju u civilizirane lokucije. Izmet na dlanu i u ustima. I ovo je mjesto gdje ti nudim drugo priopćenje. Ono o tvojoj prostoti. Ne samo da si nacionalista već si i prostak. Pa ti kao da si u ćenifi rastao, a ne u Londonu koji je prvi na Zapadu unio napravu za pranje klozeta u tu nus-prostoriju. Pogledaj malo svoj tekst meni upućen. Najfrekventniji pojmovi su klozetarski stručni izrazi. Što li je samo u tvojoj glavi kad ti ovoliko dreka izlazi iz usta? Ili si možda zadržan u razvoju, u analnoj fazi. Što bih ja radio u Londonu s tobom? Ti bi me samo po klozetima vodao. Hvala, ljepše mi je u mom selu.--Tomahawk Cheerocky 15:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baš je paradoks: ljudi puni govana seru čim zinu,

a ostaju puni govana, džabe 'deru tišinu. ;)

estavisti 17:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:BANJSKA.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BANJSKA.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. -- Longhair 09:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. May I know why do you have such a high interest in Montenegro? --HolyRomanEmperor 11:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Messanger

Ej, zdravo koristiš li koji messanger:-)? Luka Jačov 20:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vidim da si poslao sliku Image:Raso.jpg i oznacio je kao GFDL mada na srpskoj Vikipediji nema takve oznake. Zbog ovoga bi mogao uleteti u nevolju, bolje nemoj to da radis i savetujem ti da sam pobrises tagove sa drugih slika koje si poslao na taj nacin, ili ih zamenis sa FairUse itd. Nikola 07:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Raso.jpg

Greetings !

An image that you recently uploaded, Image:Raso.jpg, is lacking a source. This a mendatory information, so could you take a minute to fill this in ? Else this image might have to be removed. Thank you. Rama 08:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mehmed Pasha Sokolovic

Have you any idea how to help solve that misunderstanding? --HolyRomanEmperor 16:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad manners

Imagine someone had a userbox like yours for the EU for Serbia or for other unions like the US, the UK, or the United Arab Emirates. It is just bad manners. ROGNNTUDJUU! 20:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If an image gets speedy deleted there is a reason for it and you are not encouraged to recycle it. Imagine someone did this to your flag. ROGNNTUDJUU! 12:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:No-EU.png

Thanks for uploading Image:No-EU.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 13:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found the image at sr:Слика:No-EU.png and have added the appropriate licensing tags. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 14:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reloading the no-EU.png file - TuckerResearch 19:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hi, this comment has the potential of being construed as a series of personal attacks. Wikipedia has a policy prohibiting personal attacks and in extreme cases the user making the attacks may be blocked for disruption. Please don't make comments like that again - I understand that similar comments were directed at you, but that's never an excuse. I'm telling you this because you were reported at the personal attack intervention noticeboard. --Latinus 17:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Da ti se javim

Tebe i tebi slične sam nazvao četnicima u komentaru o Ruđeru Boškoviću. Stojim iza toga i to ću ponovit. To što sad lažeš da je to pogrdni naziv za Srbe je tipični način da sve koji su protiv tebe proglasiš hrvatskim nacionalistima. Međutim, ja nipošto ne mislim da su Srbi četnici niti ih tako nazivam jer nemam ništa protiv njih. Imam protiv četnika kao što si ti pa ODJEBI od editiranja stranica Wikipedie koji govore o evidentno hrvatskim znanstvenicima. Radije oplakuj što ti je riknuo Slobodan Milošević, a sa njim i zadnji pokušaj stvaranja Velike Srbije. I ako misliš da sam ja Tuđmanovac ili Pavelićevac, odjebi u skokovima jer ih opće ne poštujem i ista su govna ko i ti.

Jakiša Tomić

Slušaj četničino, bolje gledaj kako da napraviš propagandu protiv Crnogoraca jer ćete se vjerojatno i protiv njih zaratit kroz koju godinu po svom starom dobrom običaju. Jedini narod koji se kurči sa brojem ratova u kojem je sudjelovao. Primitivluk na kvadrat.

(This entire heap of abuse was wiped an replaced with the following word by User:213.149.38.90. --estavisti 20:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Zanemari.

Boscovich -- 3RR warning

Hello, I blocked Jakiša Tomić for violating the three-revert rule on the Rudjer Boscovich article. You came close to violating it yourself, reverting it 4 times in 27 hours, 49 minutes, as follows:

I am warning you to settle the dispute on the talk page before making more reverts, otherwise you will most likely also be blocked for continuing the disruptive edit war. — Apr. 5, '06 [00:17] <freakofnur_xture |talk>

It appears that there are other editors of that article who regularly dance around the limits of the 3RR. Persistant "gaming" with the 3RR is also a blockable offense. If somebody is in violation, or simply disruptive in general, you should report them at WP:AN3 rather than risking a block on yourself also. — Apr. 6, '06 [06:37] <freakofnur_xture |talk>

I also noticed that you have not posted to the article's talk page even once (see history), so I'm not confident that the discussion on the talk page has been adequately explored. — Apr. 6, '06 [06:40] <freakofnur_xture |talk>

Image copyright problem with Image:Srbija_opstine.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Srbija_opstine.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

licenca

Pa sa licencama ide ovako: ako si ti autor neke slike, onda je možeš staviti pod licencom "Public domain", odnosno ti si taj koji ima autorska prava na nju i koji je daje na slobodno korišćenje. Što se tiče slika koje je neko drugi uradio, da bi takve slike stavio na Vikipediju moraš dokazati da ih je njihov autor dao na slobodno korišćenje. Što se tiče te mape Srbije, moraš pogledati na tom sajtu odakle si je uzeo da li piše da je njeno korišćenje slobodno (ako to uopšte tamo i piše). Ako to tamo ne nađeš, predlažem ti da tu mapu prepaviš u Photoshopu i dobićeš novu mapu čiji si ti autor. Dakle, promeni veličinu i boju mape, kao i veličinu i boju linija, itd. Onda ćeš moći da je staviš pod licensom PD-self jer ćeš ti biti njen autor. PANONIAN (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beograd

Hvala što si mi skrenuo pažnju :-) Glasao sam. --ςerbiana ♫ 20:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ne razumem, sta fali artiklu Beograd. Meni deluje bas dobro i opsirno! Aj pojasni mi molim te o cemu je taj improvment drive pre nego glasam. Hvala! Lakinekaki 21:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bas sam smotan! sad sam procitao, na samom vrhu one stranice. da bi bio kandidat za featured article... potpisujem se! Lakinekaki 21:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Ok, thanks about info. I just vote for Belgrade. — SasaStefanovic • 23:52 8-04-2006

Turbo-folk

Hi, I'm expecting your answer at Talk:Turbo-folk. Regards, Duja 19:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Curtain

Are you saying that Yugoslavia should get its own color. Meaning that it should not be in the Iron Curtain at all. The only reason it is currently (partially) in the Iron Curtain is because it represents Yugoslavia as a Communist nation. I agree (if that is your opinion) that Yugoslavia should be marked as gray (or another color?) since it was open to both the East and the West. Yugoslavia was more western than eastern in my opinion. Kseferovic 20:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected Iron Curtain

I corrected the article Iron Curtain. I put in this image Image:Iron Curtain Correction.JPG. Made Yugoslavia gray, Abania being grey along with red diagonal lines to show their economic connection with USSR. Kseferovic 00:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Changes

I like the changes you made to the article Flags of Bosnia and Herzegovina. I created most of the article for the English Wikipedia. I was the first to add the flag proposals for the Bosnian flag change. I do have a question, however. Does Wikipedia uses English English or American English. I noticed some of the changes are:

center to centre

color to colour

These are not used in America and I am wondering which English style Wikipedia uses. Kseferovic 02:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beograd

Hvala za obavestenje o glasanju za Beograd. Velimir85

IRC

Ajde molim te navrati na IRC. Server je irc.freenode.net a kanal #wikipedia-sr, treba da popricamo oko infoboxa za gradove u srbiji, ali i da se bolje upoznamo :). Ako ne znas kako da se konektujes samo mi javi pa cu da objasnim. — SasaStefanovic • 00:18 13-04-2006

Montenegrin language alphabet

OK, you are really pissing me off big time!!!!!. Look, have you ever checked www.montenegro.org/language.html. There, you will get a better meaning that that picture of the original montenegro alphabet was the ORIGINAL ALPHABET!!!!!, not the PROPOSED ALPHABET!!!!!!. And besides, Vuk Stefanović Karadžić changed the Serbian, Croatian, and Montenegrin Alphabets to have the same letters and the same number of alphabets.

Serbian language

I know that, but I've been talking at irc and the Czech wikipedians were saying that they like more the Croatian language than the Serbian language because it uses the Latin scrypt. The Latin scrypt is (almost) completly equal in the Serbian language, unlike in the Bosnian language, where it's official too, but the Latin scrypt is greatly overwhealming. I think that, seeing that both scrypts are official, makes it a little more democratic language. And what about people like me, who learned the cyrillic scrypt very late (only recently). would you then say that I have no knowlegde of the Serbian language (since I didn't know one of its two scrypts)?

Sincerely, --HolyRomanEmperor 11:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P. S. Why don't you trust the European Union?

Wikiproject hiphop announcement

	The current Hip hop collaboration is Rapper's Delight.
	Please help improve this article ultimately to featured status. You can borrow ideas or comment on the article itself on its peer review.

--Chubdub 15:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beogradske opštine

Je l' nije problem da nekako staviš brojeve ispred imena opština kako je na slici pored? --Pockey 23:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Memorandum

Estavisti: your attempts at cleaning up the "Memorandum" article were, I think, over-aggressive. One of your requests for a citation was rendered unnecessary by the paragraph laying out the varied ideas and focuses of the authors. You removed a mundane reference to it being considered nationalistic, which it was, universally. There is no point of view problem in stating a fact, and it is not a fact that requires any particular citation. I'm fine with some of your edits, but the ones I edited back were sort of odd. Why demand citations for the obvious? Why cut reference to the Memorandum's reputation as a nationalist document? Profnjm 02:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ti bi mogao da se klonis clanaka o Srpskoj istoriji Profnjm,jer si se vec pokazao kao jedna labilna i nekompetentna osoba,tako da te molim u ime svih nas da probas da lecis svoju frustracije tamo gde se to i radi(na psihijatriskom caucu),a ne na Wikipediji,a pogotov ne na clancima koji imaju veze sa Srbijom.Dzoni 04:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mihailo Markovic

Could you please elaborate on why you placed a NPOV tag on the Mihailo Markovic article so that we could move forward and resolve the issue. Thanks in advance, --Bora Nesic 13:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you on those, but as I don't care much for the guy I didn't bother editing that stuff. I'll work on the wording some time in the future. Thanks for your input, --Bora Nesic 22:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

You voted for Lipovans, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Scottwiki 04:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Serbian

The difference is that today, the Cyrillic scrypt isn't in usage in Croatian, nor is it official. However, in the Serbian language it is in usage and is official at the same time (so you can't use that historical comparation). I'm on the #wikipedia-sr channal sometimes. Did you mean that Channal? EU: Well, if you can't draw a benefit from opposing them, then you gotta join them. :))) --HolyRomanEmperor 16:38, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note...

Your vote vote on this RfA will not be considered valid due to the nature of the various discussions involved there unless you give arguements why should the person in question (or specifically, me on this occasion) be an Administrator; so you have to clarify why you voted that way. All the best! --HolyRomanEmperor 11:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Denmark was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Church of St. Mark

Hello, I'm sorry to bother you but I would recall that you had made an article about the church of cathedral of St. Mark in Belgrade, but now I can't find it. It is also missing on the template of Patriarch of Serbia. Did you do the article and do you know the name on it? Regards Litany 20:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

	The current Serbia Collaboration of the Week is incumbent
Every week, a Serbia-related article that is in need of substantial improvement is Selected to be the Serbia Collaboration of the Week. Help improve it to a higher standard of quality.

License tagging for Image:Eng bg grb.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Eng bg grb.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Belgrade was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Hey

Hey, I don't know how much you are involved in the German Wikipedia (or how much you care about it), but they have returned the old image of the Iron Curtain for the de:Eiserner Vorhang (Politik) article (that is in German).

Let's see what we can do about it.

Thanks, Kseferovic

Western Outlands

Zdravo. To sto sam izbrisao sam ja i napisao, samo u vreme dok jos nisam znao kako se to radi, pa umesto da idem na + na discussion, isao sam na obican edit, a i to nisam uradio kako treba pa je komentar iseckan na delove. Zbog toga, a i zato sto je diskusija o tome prestala jos pre godinu dana, izbrisao sam ga...znaci nisam brisao komentare DRUGIH ljudi, nego svoj :o) Umesto toga, u neko dogledno vreme, preradicu sam clanak. Pozdrav PajaBG 18:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Тачно, али није ми пало на памет :ο) Могао сам да ставим ПајаБГД, не зна цео свет како изгледају београдске таблице. Видим да планираш да сређујеш градове и општине...ако ти је потребна помоћ, ту сам, пошто ми је географија хоби. Кренуо сам од река (направио сам страницу Rivers of Serbia and Montenegro), па je полако сређујем, од врха PajaBG 22:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lokacija Beograda

Komentarisao si da je slika lokacije Beograda loša jer su i grad i Kosovo prikazani pogrešno. Grad je apsolutno tačan, po zvaničnim i satelitskim slikama. Kosovo je prikazano različito od Crne Gore i kako god da ga prikažem nekome neće odgovarati.

Imaš li neki konkretan predlog?

Pozdrav,

--Aleksandar Šušnjar 04:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Па пази: ништа нисам цртао "руком", тако да су све ствари апсолутно званичне (мислим на границе). Ја сам само "подешавао" како ће те границе бити цртане и које су боје површина, те сам уклонио детаље (типа имена и локације осталих градова, реке, итд)... Све је то проверено поређењем са сателитским снимцима. Што се Шумадије тиче, мапа приказује само урбане општине Београда, тако да није укључена.

Оно што мени није јасно је зашто мапа неће да се прикаже у кутијици...

--Aleksandar Šušnjar 21:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey, I looked at the redirect of Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and was wondering if we could do something about it. There should be a seperate article since they are not the same "things." Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina existed from 1991 to 1998. Now it is called Bosnia and Herzeogivna. I think there could be two seperate articles, since there were/are differences in the politics, economics, etc. of the two countries.

Kseferovic 23:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manastiri

Primetio sam grešku na tvojoj stranici kod spiska manastira. Manastir Bođan sa tvoje strane se u stvari zove Bođani (osim ako ne postoji još neki drugi manastir sa imenom Bođan). PANONIAN (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The golden age of hip hop for deletion?

I see that The golden age of hip hop is up for deletion. I wonder what you think of this. P.O.N.Y. 17:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help on Mathematics

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Mathematics was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by Pruneau 21:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Boka Kotorska

I hate to break the news, but You can't even read the map. --Ante Perkovic 08:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it

I just didn't know whether I should add the Kosača or not - I don't know if they're clearly a Serbian dynasty like these others. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PoV-tag warrior

You know, I'm getting a bit annoyed over your overuse of {{pov}} and family. As soon as you see something you don't like in the article (or even something that someone else might not like, as was the case in Montenegrins recently), you use the PoV tag. I don't see it as a constructive move—how are other editors even supposed to know what your concerns are if all you leave is a brief edit summary like "I don't like it" (with unwritten but understood "but I'm currently lazy to do anything about it"). The tool does not work currently, but browsing through your recent contributions I see very little edits in Article Talk namespace—but how are other people to know what you're dissatisfied with if you are not willing to discuss it? Duja 15:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC) (P.S. Reply here if you prefer).[reply]

Re Karadjordjevic: you should have also put the tags onto the talk page; I couldn't have known that the entry already existed unless I scrolled entire list. I'll remove one from WP:RM. (P.S. You should vote now.) Duja 11:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re PoV tags: I understand your frustration, but I don't think you're helping any cause by putting them. If people have made certain effort in writing the article (your objections regardless), you're at least supposed to spend certain effort by writing what you disagree with. May I remind you to Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith? I'm not accusing you of assuming bad faith, but one could read your actions like that. Duja 11:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. For attacking with words like you did you can get blocked, use a civilized way to make your point. Anyone can rise a suspicion here, due to the intensity of revert wars. Thank you, ilir_pz 23:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Without having looked into the natured of the "provocation" you feel Ilir might have subjected you to, I won't seek to comment on the whys and wherefores; but nothing could justify the incivility you've responded with. Personally I find making objectionable comments on the basis of someone's ethnicity much more unpleasant than merely "personal" attacks, and I would urge you in the strong possible terms to refrain from such in future, and to conduct yourself in a civil manner. Alai 01:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this Estavisti, another provocation from the "Albanian mafia" ;-) --

serbiana - talk 01:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:FINAL1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FINAL1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:LUDA3-plakat1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LUDA3-plakat1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

good idea

unfortunately, I am very inactive on wiki for long by now - you could start and I could jump in and follow as soon as I get free time. --HolyRomanEmperor 09:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Serbian culture

Because Serbian culture and Culture of Serbia would overlap in so big extent that it would be extremely difficult to distinguish and maintain the two. You seem to have found out a rare example where two articles exist -- even then, German culture is barely over a stub or disambiguation page. Irish culture, French culture etc. are redirect to Culture of Ireland and Culture of France. Russian culture/Culture of Russia, as a more similar situation to ours, follow the German example. As I said, you're theoretically right that two terms are not the same, but I simply think it's more practical (if not ideal) to maintain the current situation with one article (at least for the time being). Duja 14:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --digital_m e^(t/c) 20:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tabele

Ok, uradi onda tabele za sve popise kod demografske istorije Vojvodine. Biće jako ružno ako ostaviš tabelu samo na ovom jednom a na drugima ne. :) PANONIAN (talk) 21:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa na kraju članka imaš linkove do sajtova odakle sam uzeo većinu podataka. Podatke za popis 1910 sam uzeo sa ovog linka:

http://www.rastko.org.yu/istorija/srbi-balkan/djuric-curcic-kicosev-vojvodina.html Ako podaci tu ne valjaju, samo ih uzmi sa drugog linka. PANONIAN (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nego, ovu tabelu sa popisa iz 1890 preklapa mapa. Jel možeš to da popraviš? PANONIAN (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problem je u Operi, mapa preklapa okvir tabele. PANONIAN (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nemam mesindžer. Pa znaš kako, bolje prvo završi tabele za sve popise, a onda ću ja pokušati da rešim problem, ako treba premestiću mapu na drugo mesto. PANONIAN (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Grb-pala.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-pala.gif. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Bhadani has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

--Bhadani 14:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Re:

Cim se Crna Gora oformira kao drzava - ako do toga uopce dodje. --HolyRomanEmperor 18:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Serbism

Lets start a petition or something to rename Serbophobia to Anti-Serbism. When the first deletion vote started I had sufested that, but I was offline ever since. --Milan Tešovic 16:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Bosniak sentiment и Anti-Croatian sentiment су ту само да нам парирају, мада те ствари постоје. Ствар је у томе што је са нама другачије. Ово је стварно анти-сербизам. Сад - ја знам да ће они или тражити да се врати на фобију или сентимент, или ће ове своје премјестити на анти-кроатизм и анти-босниакзм. Овдје нема професионалности, само гомила кретена који празне своје комплексашке потребе. --Milan Tešovic 18:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CG Wikipedia

Hey Estavisti, there is currently a vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. If you want to vote, go to meta:Requests for new languages. There you can vote. Ask your friends on Wikipedia (if you have any) who haven't voted to vote. Thanks. Crna Gora ^{(Talk/Contribs/Edit Count)} 21:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked for editing Wikipedia for next 24 hours for edit warring on Serbs of Croatia. As you can see here, as a result of last edit war there, I promised to block undiscussed reverts. Here you can find link to your undiscussed revert. After your block expires, you might wan't to join discussion here. --Dijxtra 15:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tag again

A tag has been added again to the Eparchy of Montenegro and the Littoral article. --HolyRomanEmperor 19:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned

I asked, explicitly, that you not alter the article on the House of Petrović away from the compromise version I had inserted. I left a commented-out warning that would be visible only to those who tried to remove the compromise. You removed it anyway.

As punishment, you will provide me with your physical address, and I will come to your house and sing to you from the collected works of Gilbert and Sullivan for six hours, or until your head explodes (whichever comes first).

WHEN I WAS A LAD, I SERVED A TERM!
AS OFFICE BOY IN AN ATTORNEY'S FIRM!
I CLEANED THE WINDOWS, AND I SWEPT THE FLOOR!
AND I POLISHED UP THE HANDLE ON THE BIG FRONT DOOR!

You may wish to say goodbye to your relatives. DS 13:38, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help on William Shakespeare

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week William Shakespeare was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by Pruneau^T 00:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.[reply]

Please read this, especially the end of the section. I'm not going to remove the userbox again, but I would ask you to consider whether having such material on your user page is helpful to building an encyclopaedia. The category stays off the page. --ajn (talk) 12:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serbophobia - 2

1. "Yugoslavia was dominated by the Serbian nation" - okay, how should I put it? The capital was Belgrade, the dynasty was Karađorđevići, the Serbs were in the majority, many or most Croats didn't even want to be in it in the first place. There must be some way to express that in a single phrase. During the revert war last spring, a similar sentence was found in the version to which the Serbian side was reverting, starting from this diff and ending with this one: "Among those three nations Serbs have had far outnumbered other two nations, had far strongest political power and had their dinasty Karadjordjevici for a Yugoslavias rulers."

2. References for shkije/nigger. It would be very easy to find references for nigger if these were requested (and of course, any English-speaking person knows about nigger, while few know about shkije, and they can't just take somebody's word for it). In May, I had no problem finding sources for vlah and chetnik [2], when these were requested. It's just a matter of making a slight effort.

3. Ante Starcevic calling the Serbs "subhuman" - reading the article about him, I don't see a proof of that. According to the current text of that article, he used the term Slavosrb mostly in a political sense, referring to his Croatian opponents who were adherents of South Slavic unity. The article does mention that he ridiculed the Serbs, (for which he was criticised by some of his own supporters), but not that he "viewed them as subhuman". So, until a source of some sort is provided, I think the word "subhuman" is too strong. --194.145.161.227 11:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

If you wish to make some locator maps: http://www.tageo.com/index.htm --Ante Perkovic 22:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalizer

don't know how to report this guy, but he's obviously vandalizing all pages with external links, can you point me in the right direction how to report him for vandalism? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serbian_Orthodox_Church&diff=62974073&oldid=62545664 --Lowg 02:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Estavisti,

I reported him first, please erase your report and return mine, you'll get the next one. I'm sorry you had to fill everything in, but too late. You can add your comment below mine, and of course, add the extra reverts I maybe missed. Please do so, thank you. --KOCOBO 07:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dijaspora

To што не живиш у Србији није разлог да уништаваш сваки чланак који ја побољшам.Нађи девојку или што би рекли ту код вас,у дијаспори гет а лифе,али немој више да квариш моје измене Srbocetnik 03:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC) (Џони са Српске Вики)[reply]

Serb and Serbian

(Apart from our other differences in opinion) I don't think you're right regarding the meaning and scope of "Serb" and "Serbian" in English. Quote (American Heritage Dictionary):

Ser·bi·an (sûr“b¶-…n) n. 1. A native or inhabitant of Serbia; a Serb.

Serb (sûrb) n. A member of a southern Slavic people that is the principal ethnic group of Serbia

I understand that it is ambiguous and needs to be resolved in several contexts. However, "Serb" can seldom function as an adjective; your changes to "Serb Orthodox Church" seem futile when even its own site translates it as "Serbian Orthodox Church". So, please, use "Serb" as adjective more sparely, and only when a disambiguation is absolutely necessary and cannot be established from context. Also, there's always Serbs' as an adjective. (Reply here if you prefer). Duja 08:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy

Hi there! I've noticed that you've edited articles pertaining to the Eastern Orthodox Church. I wanted to extend an invitation to you to join the WikiProject dedicated to organizing and improving articles on the subject, which can be found at: WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. This WikiProject was begun because a need was perceived to raise the level of quality of articles on Wikipedia which deal with the Eastern Orthodox Church.

You can find information on the project page about the WikiProject, as well as how to join and how to indicate that you are a member of the project. Additionally, you may be interested in helping out with our collaboration of the month. I hope you'll consider joining and thank you for your contributions thus far! —A.S. Damick ^talk ^contribs 12:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Grb Karadjordjevica.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb Karadjordjevica.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Durin 17:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

You may want to express your opinion here. --Svetislav Jovanović 01:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Punk music

Whats up? Hi, I'm trying to gather some more interest and support for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Punk music. Please check out the topics and lets get our WikiProject to function better. Recently, I've taken an interest in the Wikipedia:WikiProject hip hop and I consider that WikiProject to be better developed. I am now writing to usernames on the hiphopWP who might be interested in helping with the punkmusicWP. Hopefully we can all work together to improve articles relating to punk as has been done well with hip hop. Finally, I am trying to gather support and opinions concerning the punk house article and specifically the Theta Beta Potata article which is currently in AfD (x2) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theta Beta Potata (second nomination). Please check it out and voice your opinion. Xsxex 09:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Napravite red u Tesla article

Jebeni hrvati uvek promene da je bio croatian kad je bio srbin. Jebem jim mamu

RED!!!!

Hey...

Pozdrav Estavisti,

Glavno ime opstine nije Brod nego Bosanski Brod. Nemoj misliti da sam neki fanatik koji ne prizna RS ili je protiv Srba. Ali kada ste vec usli u BiH politiku molim vas da pogledate stranicu: [3]. Ovo je glavna stranica Valde Republike Srpske. Na njoj pise da Ustavni Sud BiH sa RS je zakljucio da glavno ime mora biti vraceno na Bosanski Brod. Jedan zahtjev ako moze je da mi pomognes oko jednog korisnika koji pise clanak oko "Srpskog Broda" i Ilira, pretjerano. Trebamo napraviti redirect na to.

Hvala i pozdrav, Kseferovic 22:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Leibniz 231.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leibniz 231.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Just wanted to say welcome back :) Lowg 05:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing disambiguation

In this edit. Please see Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links. From that page "Ideally, Wikipedia articles should not link to disambiguation pages (with rare exceptions where the ambiguity of a term is being discussed); instead links should go directly to the appropriate article.". Both Bosnian and Serbian are disambiguation pages, and should not be directly linked to. Please do not undo any more disambiguation work. -- Jeff3000 22:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Narmapop.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Narmapop.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eparhije

U pravu si za eparhije. Mapu sam uradio prema jednoj koju sam našao na nekom sajtu. Popraviću to. PANONIAN (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Republika Srpska article

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Republika Srpska. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I know it's a controversial article, but try to keep your cool and discuss major changes at the talk page first. Cordless Larry 01:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Republic of Vojvodina

Good afternoon my friend! I knew that someone will want to delete my article. You are biased to .(Kosovo je Srpsko) This question exists in Vojvodina. I have citations(external links) about it. I'll wrote them down. Sorry I want to wrote 5-6%, I will correct it. You can corrert the article to if you think that I wasn't objective enough. But I think the article should't be deleted maybe repaired. HunTheGoaT 17:25, 28 September 2006 (CEST)

Nikola Tesla

I reverted it because it's a biographical page and information regarding his birthplace and citizenship is relevant and should be linked. Putting that information in the lead-in text of the article is common practice. Sparkhead 01:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree...just like Röntgen was a German physicist, Thomas Edison was an American inventor, and Leonardo was an Italian everything...ethnicity is in most cases included in the opening paragraph of bio's. --Onorem 05:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WP:3RR. Do not revert the article again. Thanks. Sparkhead 01:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BH municipality location3.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BH municipality location3.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Bosnia and Herzegovina

Thanks for joining. I know will have a blast as long as we all work together. Pozdrav, Kseferovic 02:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template Serbs

Pa ne možeš tek tako menjati veličinu nekog šablona a da te uopšte nije briga kakav to efekat ima u člancima gde se šablon nalazi. Pogledaj sad ove članke na šta liče: Serbs in Romania Serbs of Croatia. Šablon sada gura dole slike, koje opet sa sobom vuku tekst i na šta to liči. Ajde molim te pripazi na takve izmene ubuduće. PANONIAN (talk) 13:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De Administrando Imperio rv

You reverted my last edit without any explanation. My I ask you why?--Matt Parlow 16:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because you're deleting half the article and have explicitly refused a discussion, deeming yourself above your intelocutor. That's vandalism, basically. --estavisti 16:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I quite clearly described what I removed and why. Yes, I am above any ignorant and if anyone wants to discuss the issue - (s)he shall be knowleadge about this subject. Better learn basic things about this Porphyrogenitus work and then talk about vandalism--Matt Parlow 17:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you may want to comment Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 3. Nikola 20:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BiH Maps

Znam da si vise za drugu verziju mape (ona sa kordi.) ali ipak mislim da bi trebala korisiti ovu Image:BosanskaKostajnica Municipality Location.png (with resepct to the county names) zato sto svaka drzava ima ovaj sistem mapa. Nastavi ce mo na WikiProjektu stranici Vseferović 03:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Serbian-American

I believe you changed the nationality to Serb-American. There needs to be "ian" after Serb so both nationalities end in "n." It just sounds wrong or awkward otherwise. I checked Google and for Tesla "Serb-American" there were only 165 hits, but for Tesla "Serbian-American" there were 995 hits. Can you live with Tesla being described as "Serbian-American?"Edison 03:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "Greek-American" is common in Google but "Grecian-American" is rare. Contrariwise, "Turkish-American" is common but "Turk-American" is rare. "British-American" is common but "Brit-American" is rare. "Croatian-American" is common but "Croat-American" is rare. The article has a very short halflife for nationality statements in any event, so you might as well leave it per your edit. I had only a stylistic objection and not one based on national feeling. By the way, you said ""Serbian" refers to people from Serbia, regardless of whether they are Serbs, Hungarians etc." But Tesla was born in Lika, Austro-Hungarian Military Frontier, per his first American patent. Food for thought.Edison 03:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC) Would that make him "an Austro-Hungarian-American Serb"?Edison 04:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you dislike Am-E?

Hej zali ne mislis da mnogo onih vanjski linkova na Bosanska Dubica su samo-reklamiranje. Kao proizvodnja drva i radio stanica Feniks. Mislim da to je samo reklairanje i ne treba biti u vanjskim linkovima. Vseferović 19:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serbianisation

I see you deleted my effort on this page which I have just now restored. I would prefer it to stay there until we have discussed it. I may be British but I have had business down the years in the Balkans so I do know a few things about the recent history. My key point was that Serbianisation - or if you like, Yugoslavianisation with Serbian influence - did affect Macedonia and Montenegro. In 1998 I interviewed an old woman who went to school before world war II, and received a slap on the face from the teacher for saying "Dobar den" instead of "dan", this happened in Krushevo, Macedonia (now). This clearly affected not only Macedonia but the Torlakian areas too, as for Montenegro, they too always spoke in their own dialects amounting to language but todays Montenegrin is totally transformed and only remnants of the earlier register remain. Speak to any older Montenegrin and he will tell you the same. As for the military, there was NO talking in Macedonian/Montenegrin (nor did there exist Macedonian standard yet) during the inbetween-war period. These small things did have an effect on the culture and would have if successful made modern Macedonians and Montenegrins totally Serbian. If it lasted longer I meant. Celtmist 21:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3rr warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Bosnian War. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Duja 12:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahihoho warned too. See the Talk:Bosnian War. Duja 12:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Sorry, I have to better learn counting to 4. It was more a matter of courtesy towards Hahahihihoho, and I didn't mean to apply punitive measures for 3RR anyway. His further "courtesy" towards myself in return ended up by an infinite block. So, I'm scratching the warning. Consider the matter settled. Duja 14:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HVALA !

Hvala za sredjivanje Prijepolja ,mnogo hvala,a i da te pohvalim za ove clanke sto si zapocheo Edo Maajka etc...jel treba translation ? Bx228 20:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Daću ti samo dva primera zašto je tvoja izmena na Template:Infobox City Serbia3 pogrešna. Ovde imaš dva članka u kojima se ovaj template nalazi:

1. Plandište Dakle, Plandište nije grad već selo, i ovde nikako ne možemo napisati "highlighting the town location".
2. Palilula Belgrade Ovde ne možemo napisati "Mayor" umesto "municipality president" jer Beograd ima samo jednog "mayor"-a, a ovo drugo su predsednici opština koji su nižeg ranga od "mayor"-a. PANONIAN (talk) 22:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, pazi: to "municipality president" sam dodao zato što se neko bunio na ono "mayor", a sad ti opet hoćeš to da obrišeš. U redu, obriši "municipality president", video sam ovde da se reč gradonačelnik koristi i za gradske opštine Niša na primer: http://www.cesid.org/lokalni2004/rezultati.jsp?opstina=71323 PANONIAN (talk) 23:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]