User talk:Gwikor Frank

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Crying the Neck have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Crying the Neck was changed by Gwikor Frank (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954505 on 2021-02-01T15:27:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Welcome, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, complete error on my part, not sure how it ended up on enwiki, it was destined for kwwiki. Please delete. Thank you! Gwikor Frank (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Blogs and Goodreads are not reliable sources. DuncanHill (talk) 23:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DuncanHill And what about the third source? To the book that is already accepted as a reliable source in the references already? --Gwikor Frank (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DuncanHill Not to mention the fact that Bernard Deacon's website is not a blog, but a collection of articles by a former head of the Institute of Cornish Studies! --Gwikor Frank (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Wikipedia:Teahouse while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 11:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not me, pard. Take it up with the IP ed. Gwikor Frank (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, make sure you're logged in. Three of us is nice, but two of us is plenty, and much better than only one of us. Thanks for fixing the nationality problems on multiple articles. 😁👍 Tewdar 12:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hlo gwikor frank, are you active mostly only on cornish wiki? i cant use my own as i am indian (i know two indian languages but i prefer english) General Phoenix (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I don't really do anything on English Wiki, mostly because they're like this whenever I try. Gwikor Frank (talk) 18:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having had this explained to me, apparently this was absolutely me! I do apologise, it seems I've misread the entire thing. Thanks for trying to point it out to me, sorry I was too confused to notice! Gwikor Frank (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality

Further to your numerous edits, please note that Cornish is not a nationality. Do not change people's nationality's from English or British to Cornish. - SchroCat (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further to YOUR Numerous reverts 1) Cornish IS a nationality: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/people-and-communities/equality-and-diversity/cornish-national-minority/ 2) See discussion and consensus reached here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Kernow Gwikor Frank (talk) 15:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reporting you at ANI for disruption. I strongly suggest you stop now. - SchroCat (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one disrupting! We've come to a consensus already and YOU are the one saying Cornish isn't a Nationality, which it IS: https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/people-and-communities/equality-and-diversity/cornish-national-minority/ Gwikor Frank (talk) 15:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - SchroCat (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merow Gwikor Frank (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You are making some good points in an unnecessarily combative and divisive fashion. Your grudge against the British Empire does not justify that behavior. Please consider this a warning that I (or another administrator) will block you if this disruptive behavior continues. I hope that it doesn't come to that because I think that you have a lot to offer. Cullen328 (talk) 20:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am genuinely not trying to be combative, but honestly this isn't the first time I've had the way I talk called combative, usually right around the time my gender becomes clear. I hope you can believe that I am trying resolve this situation and that I am if anything only quite frustrated. If Schro had been more keen to discuss himself, rather than taking me to whatever this arbitration is, I'd feel a lot less so. Thank you for the advice. I'm trying my best. Gwikor Frank (talk) 20:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like, he didn't even talk to me, he just undid over a days work with a claim that didn't even seem relevant. I've been on the backfoot ever since. When we discussed this in the Teahouse it was much more pleasant and co-operative. I wish this had been like that. Gwikor Frank (talk) 20:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has literally nothing to do with your gender, and it is not possible for you to find anything in my wording at the Teahouse, at ANI or here on this page that would justify you drawing that unwarranted conclusion about my intent. Cullen328 (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They usually say that too. Gwikor Frank (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am truly sorry that you have chosen to disregard my advice, which was offered in good faith. My warning stands. Cullen328 (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm also female and your behaviour isn't okay. Secretlondon (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your useful input on the subject matter, friend. Gwikor Frank (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]