User talk:Freshgavin

VANDALISM THREAT

Guarded

__

06年06月20日

06年10月27日

Happy Halloween!

Ya! I'm the first on your fresh new talk page! Have a great day! Happy Halloween too! X [[[User:Mac Davis|Mac Davis]]] (SUPERDESK|Help me improve) 18:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit summaries

I got it and thank you for advising. --Izumi5 08:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ryo Fukawa.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ryo Fukawa.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 03:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RefDeskBot Mess-up

Hi – thanks for explaining that problem to me on my talk page, and apologies for the time I took to respond! I took at look at RDB's contribs, and it seems to have archived the HD twice – which probably caused the problem. Luckily, I know exactly why – the archival didn't run at midnight, so I had to run it manually at around 11:26 UTC – but I put the code in a while(true) statement – ie – it decided to run infinitely. I though I'd caught the problem in time, but it appears not! This is my theory for why it happenned (that is – it's my fault!), but I may be wrong, though this seems to be the most obvious reason. Thanks again -- M a rtinp23 11:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Summers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Summers.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 05:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Teruyoshi Uchimura.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Teruyoshi Uchimura.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 03:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for the Support

I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, Freshgavin, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, M a rtinp23 14:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

About Refdeskbot – I'd just better make it clear that I prefer the current system above anything else and am quite happy with it (I'd have to say that :p). Hopefully people will settle down about the change soon (and the IP who took offence at it has left a message at WT:BOTS, asking for a change, just FYI). Thanks - M a rtinp23 18:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – thanks for telling me. It was the internet unfortunately – I've not been able to do the other desks with the bot as they've been done (at least, the transclusion has) – thanks! M a rtinp23 18:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference desk archives

I dug up this old page, which is older than what you have there. I moved it to the reference desk archive and made the old page a redirect. Just wanted to let you know, in case you wanted to parse it to make it look like the other ones. --⁪froth^{T C} 06:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dajare

That's still funny if someone mistakes a wall for a well...either way, good pun! :) In Defense of the Artist 19:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Desk Problem

I don't know if someone does it manually or if its done by a bot, however, the porblem lies here.

All Question before December 31 have been archived.

However this is not being done for Jan 1, 2007 on all reference desks, and now they are exploding in size.

Furthermore the new Entertainment desk has never been archived.

What I mean by archive is you know once archived {{is there on the start date of archive with the date}}. --Judged 05:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music

If you are receiving this message, you are currently listed as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music. We need more active members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music. So please tell your friends who like electronic music and are willing to put in hours writing about it. If there are any suggestions for features for this Wikiproject I will help out with them and see what I can do. Please add any projects you are working on to the list – I will gladly help out with them as best I can. Since the original project founder has been MIA for 9 months or so, I'm declaring myself pseudo-king and cheerleader of this Wikiproject. Basically, that probably means that I'm just going to do the most work related to this project for now. For anyone who is reading this: PLEASE TELL YOUR WIKI AND REAL-LIFE FRIENDS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN ELECTRONIC MUSIC ABOUT THIS PROJECT! We need active members! Wickethewok 11:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Logo-text-japanese-2.png

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-text-japanese-2.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Sword

Here's a link to the full-resolution image: [1]. It's 5 megs... I think you were opening the smaller auto-generated thumbnail. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Waikui.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Waikui.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Becky.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Becky.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested...

...to hear that the spirit of your proposed RD layout change lives on!

Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#REFERENCE DESK STYLE CHANGE

--⁪froth^T 05:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rakugo

Back in January 2006 you listed rakugo for clean up. I just went through it, and am wondering what you think of it now. DocWatson42 22:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Downtown kombi.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Downtown kombi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Creamstew onair.jpg

Hello, Freshgavin. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (File:Creamstew onair.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Freshgavin/Sandbox/Cream Stew. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with File:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dajare love.jpg

Hello, Freshgavin. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (File:Dajare love.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Freshgavin/Sandbox/Dajare. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with File:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Application Error.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Application Error.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 12:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NO PLAN black.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:NO PLAN black.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Yasuda_dvd.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Yasuda dvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chibi

As you commented about the Chibi article before, I thought you might be interested to know that it has gone to AfD. The discussion is here. JohnnyMrNinja 08:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TIM_kombi.jpg

I have tagged File:TIM kombi.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project deletion

As you have participated in WikiProject Gaijin Tarento, you should be aware of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Gaijin tarento. Please go participate there if you wish. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 04:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hikari_Ota.jpg

I have tagged File:Hikari Ota.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 16:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Yasuda dai circus.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yasuda dai circus.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 13:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In case you were curious

This is what your old reference desk rehaul idea would look like in the new format :) --⁪ffroth 00:42, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind I irrevocably broke that project with a major overhaul to the header code. sorry --⁪ffroth 04:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Othello kombi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Othello kombi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:YOOH.png

Thanks for uploading File:YOOH.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Speed wagon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Speed wagon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Creamstew onair.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Creamstew onair.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

London_boots.jpg

I have tagged File:London boots.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 13:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Oota souri.png

Thanks for uploading File:Oota souri.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added to WP:Missing Wikipedians

Hey there, this is just to notify you that this account name has been added to the list of missing Wikipedians because unfortunately you stopped editing. If you decide to return or just don't want to be listed, you can go ahead and remove your name from the list. -- œ ^™ 17:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dajare love.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dajare love.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kombi infobox

Template:Kombi infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inu ga Nyaa to Naita Hi

The article Inu ga Nyaa to Naita Hi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources in en.wiki article or in ja.wiki article. Search does not bring up any reliable independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]