User talk:Timtrent

Click here to leave a new message, LINK to any article you want me to look at And sign your posts using ~~~~. I may not bother with posts where articles are not linked and posts are not signed. I may just delete them and ignore them and you. I do not review drafts on request, nor, normally, do I review a draft more than once, so please do not ask If you want me to do something for you, make it easy for me, please.

This is the home account for Fiddle Faddle, which is both my nickname and my alternate account. When you begin a new message section here, I will respond to it here. When I leave message on your Talk page, I will watch your page for your response. This maintains discussion threads and continuity. See Help:Talk page#How to keep a two-way conversation readable. If you want to use {{Talkback}} or {{ping}} to alert me about messages elsewhere, please feel free to do so.

It is 8:04 AM where this user lives. If it's the middle of the night or during the working day they may well not be online. For accurate time please the page

I do not remove personal attacks directed at me from this page. If you spot any, please do not remove them, even if vile, as they speak more against the attacker than against me.

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

In the event that what you seek is not here then it is archived (0.9 probability). While you are welcome to potter through the archives the meaning of life is not there.

Kudos

Kudos for your support with me creating my first draft and explaining in easy to understand detail about that my draft may actually not work out because of source types. UKSchoolUpdates (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

@UKSchoolUpdates Thank you for your very kind words. I wish I could be more encouraging with this particular draft. I am just not at all sure that you can find verifiable notability for it. If you do then you have my support. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 00:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Alaric Naudé for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alaric Naudé is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaric Naudé until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Relm (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Not my article, but I will look at it and the discussion, @RelmC 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

@RelmC Ah, I thought it sounded familiar. I have left a comment, but will not leave an opinion either way. Thank you for letting me know. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

No problem! I just wanted to inform you in the case you had anything to contribute or wanted the feedback from that process. Have a nice day! Relm (talk) 22:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

@RelmC It will be interesting to see what happens. I accept borderline drafts reasonably regularly. In many cases I am right to do so, in some the community view differs from mine. I believe all AFC reviewers should get closer to the borderline, because AfD is no shame, it's just a community process rather than an individual's opinion. Anyone taking it personally would be a bit silly, in my view. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

@RelmC Certainly in the early stages of the discussion it appears to be heading for deletion. It would be good if more folk found this discussion and contributed during the remainder of the listing period. I will be happy with either retention or deletion, but a fuller discussion is always better. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

regarding wikipidea page for manoj tygai, sanskar tv

hi,

i saw that you had reviewed the page for Mr. Manoj Tyagi, CEO of sanskar TV and have moved it for not publishing it online. Actually, I am a big fan of his work and have been following him for quite sometime, hence i wanted to create a wiki page for him as i couldn't find any proper page on his name available on the wikipidea. But since, i am a new person over here, can you guide me the correct way so that i can correct my mistakes and republish it again. it would be very helpful for me to learn this new platform and how it works and to know what mistakes i made so that i can correct them and republish the required content.

Thanks Bizjunket (talk) 08:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bizjunket I have simply reviewed it and declined it. Please read HELP:YFA, and use that in conjunction with my review.

I have now asked you for second time on your user talk page about paid editing. Please answer that question, on your user talk page, with precision and clarity as the next thing that you do. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello in refrence to the draft Bruse Wane

Hello Timtrent I hope all is Well. Thank you for extending your time to help me. I have made some changes to the Draft Bruse Wane please take a look at it when you can Thanks Draft:Bruse Wane ~~~~ Edward Myer (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@Edward Myer I am busy right now. I expect to be able to take a look tonight. 9pm (ish) here 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

OK thank you. Edward Myer (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Quick Question

Hi Timtrent, does WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Beezy Gh seem reasonable to you. I'm a bit rusty and I know you are quite experienced with socking around AfC. Thanks, --Seawolf35 ^T--C 23:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@Seawolf35 I think I might not be able to see a justification for CU, but no harm in asking. Generally the clerks, CUs, and admins are happy with reports like this, and may ask for further information. I'm not familiar with this set of editors, Well done for filing a report. Far too many folk are nervous about doing so, so socks slip past. Yes I think it to be reasonable. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@Seawolf35 Found one to add to the list, and suggested we may need a sleeper check. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 00:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't suspect this a large sockfarm or anything like that but a check can't hurt. --Seawolf35 ^T--C 00:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

@Seawolf35 One can never tell. Or at least those of us who don't have the right goggles can never tell. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 00:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For your kindness in helping a user, Edward Myer, who was dangerously close to an indef learn how to contribute productively. Thank you so much for all the time and effort you have put into helping the user understand our notability guidelines and improve their draft :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 03:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

@MolecularPilot Thank you. Editors in genuine pain deserve one solid try. It is by no means always successful, but the attempt is worthwhile. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)