User talk:Dim. Nor. 86

Dim. Nor. 86, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Dim. Nor. 86!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Dim. Nor. 86! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:05, Thursday, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Lionel Messi

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia and congratulations on completing the Adventure. Your edit request on Lionel Messi has been answered. I see that most of the them were done already. It is silly to point out now since you have the autoconfirmed permission with all of the edits you have done, but you did leave this edit request open and you could have deleted it after your first edit on the page. Thank you for your work and I hope you will edit many more articles. Inomyabcs (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate sources

Hello Dim. Nor. 86, I have linked Wikipedia's sourcing policy for you in the article history of Lionel Messi but you continue to add and restore material with inappropriate sources. I'm going to assume good faith and take it that you simply missed the link.

Since the article is a biography of a living person, the sources must be of the highest quality. Daily Mail and Goal.com are inappropriate for biographical information, but it's understandable if people assume otherwise. Sport tabloids like Marca and Sport are dubious but not outright unreliable. However, you're adding sources that can't by any stretch of the imagination be called reliable: messivsronaldo.net, messinews.net, 24sevennews.co.ke, scoopnest.com, crazyhorsebooks.com, analysisfc.com. A source of that calibre is not better than no source.

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia guidelines and edit accordingly. You're creating more work for other editors and yourself. Prayer for the wild at heart (talk) 07:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Man of the match

Hi, Man or the match is not considered to be an honour per WP:CONSENSUS so please stop adding that to plyer articles. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 20:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of FC Barcelona records and statistics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matty,

I re-wrote it using a valid citation/reference this time (straight from the FC Barcelona's official website).

Thanks for your notice! Dim. Nor. 86

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dim. Nor. 86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UEFA Goal Of The Season (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not sure what you're trying to achieve here. The page includes markup to redirect to other pages, but also includes content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dim. Nor. 86, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UEFA Goal Of The Season (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The criteria for a topic having an article about it on Wikipedia is significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources. At the moment all the references bar one are on the UEFA site. What UEFA says about the subject isn't independent, because this is a UEFA prize. The one independent source cited, CBS Sports, doesn't talk about the prize - it just announces who won it one year and why. So that doesn't count as substantial coverage. You can either see if you can find additional sources that have covered the subject in depth, or you could consider merging the content into one of the existing articles about UEFA. If you are adding to an existing article then there's no need to show notability of the prize.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dim. Nor. 86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season

Hello, Dim. Nor. 86. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UEFA Goal Of The Season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 02:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UEFA Goal Of The Season (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SshibumXZ was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more reliable secondary sources, and also maybe a table listing out the winners of the award. Maybe also tone down on the promotional tone like "unanimously legendary goal against Bayern Munich", and maybe wikilink too. All the best!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 19:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lionel Messi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Add sources with the content added, not later on when you can be bothered to. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for your contributions at Lionel Messi! If you have the time, could you look into the record for most hat-tricks for the Argentine national team? I think he got that as well, with 5. I dont have the time to research it myself. Thank you :-) Csknowitall (talk) 13:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages

I notice from your edit history that despite making more than 500 edits in your two and a half years here, you have made just five edits to article talk pages. However, you seem more than willing to make comments to and about other editors in edit summaries. I suggest that instead of edit warring over the content you are intending to add, you should perhaps comment on Talk:Lionel Messi and engage with other editors about the content you wish to add. If you fail to do so, we can only assume you're not here to help collaborate on building a better encyclopaedia and you may be headed towards being blocked from editing in the future. – Pee Jay 12:46, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (El País King of European Soccer) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating El País King of European Soccer, Dim. Nor. 86!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article. Would be nice to know why the award was discontinued.

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Messi magazine awards

The awards are fine, but there is a size limit to how much stuff you can put into the main article. Creating a sub article for Messi’s awards, like with Cristiano, would be ideal. There you could list every single award, including from magazines, and then just link that to the main article. F8RIL (talk) 00:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UEFA Goal Of The Season

Hello, Dim. Nor. 86. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UEFA Goal Of The Season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dim. Nor. 86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dim. Nor. 86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

.

Proposed deletion of 2012 Joan Gamper Trophy

The article 2012 Joan Gamper Trophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is merely an annual pre-season friendly; a single match, details of which could comfortably be placed into the overall article for the event (which is notable in itself, being one of the older and better known pre season traditions). Each edition does not merit its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crowsus (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Dim. Nor. 86, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 17:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

February 2021

Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lionel Messi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. IFFHS isn't the "most credible and valid football source worldwide". It's just a source like any other who subjectively voted Messi. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Messi

The IFFHS was removed from the Messi article as there was a previous consensus not to place either him nor C.Ronaldo as greater than the other. The Pele article only refers to the 20th C, not all time. Personally speaking, in 25 years of watching the game Messi is the greatest player I’ve seen, with the second best being Ronaldo (the Brazilian), however, a new consensus would be required to alter the wording. Nampa DC (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina national football team

Hello, I noticed one of your edit summaries at Argentina national football team and I just wanted to explain why this section was previously edited. If you check the edit history of the page, you'll see that all of these statistics were removed because they go against Wikipedia's established policies and guidelines ([1], [2] and [3]). Per WP:NOTSTATS – Wikipedia articles should not be: ... Excessive listings of unexplained statistics. A number of them are also completely unsourced. All content on Wikipedia has to be verifiable and that is done by providing reliable sources. If you are unfamiliar with referencing, take a look at WP:REFBEGIN. Any unsourced material can be challenged and removed by another editor, the onus is on the person who added the content to ensure it is properly sourced. If these statistics are relevant then by all means include them as prose (see MOS:USEPROSE) in the relevant section. Take a look at Brazil v Germany (2014 FIFA World Cup)#Records for an example of how to do this.

As a word of advice, try to take what other editors do in good faith. Calling another editor "mean" could be seen as a personal attack and accusations of vandalism can be taken very seriously. Have a look at WP:CONDUCT if you want more information.

Hope that helps and if you've any questions just ask. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 09:08, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina National Football Team

Hello Stevie, I am very much familiar with the references. If you had checked out my contributions all these years, you would have known that. Speaking of references, how can you explain that 3 out of the 5 goal records HAVE NO REFERENCE but are still there (untouched) and not deleted/reverted ?? :/ Many Wiki users have the same question I guess...

Two of those were left because they should be verifiable so I've tagged them as needing a citation. A short list like that with the most important/relevant stats is perfect for that section, to make it longer it would be better to have it as prose. I've removed one of those five as well per WP:NOTSTATS as it should have been removed previously. Sorry if I implied that you don't know what you are doing earlier. That was not my intention, just wanted to make sure I covered every basis. Hope that helps. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 20:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL

Hi. I've seen you post uncivil messages on multiple Talk pages of other editors. Please stop. We all get frustrated over editing disagreements once a while but we should try to remain WP:CIVIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robbie! Nothing to do with frustration here, it is all about FAIRNESS, TRUTH & FACTS. You did notice my "uncivil messages" but haven't you not noticed all the inexplicable reversions to my sincere posts ?? I dedicate some of my free time on contributing Wikipedia and the "reward" is to see my posts constantly deleted/reverted ??? I always post based on TRUTH, FACTS & VALIDATION. My edits are always based on FACTS (AND FOLLOWED BY THE RESPECTIVE VALID/RELIABLE REFERENCE), however I see certain users (the right word is certain vandalisers, not "users") keep reverting them without a reason... This shows that Wikipedia DOES NOT WORK RIGHT. Something is wrong here.. You simply cannot ignore so many important facts/records regarding for example the most prestigious football accolade in the world or a famous National Football Team. You cannot allow this to be happening... You should find a way to dismiss those "users" for the sake of Wikipedia. They revert just to revert. They are in denial. They do not care at all about Wikipedia, they just want to hide the truth and the facts.

My suggestion to you and to Wikipedia is that you appoint some users as RESPONSIBLE ONES (CONTROLLERS) who can check out what should be written and what not. If it is an UNDENIABLE FACT, then accept it, and if it is not, then ignore/revert it... THIS IS THE RIGHT WAY WIKIPEDIA SHOULD WORK. Because in the end, it is very ridiculous for the community of Wikipedia, all the world to be aware of something and that something to be deliberately ignored/not mentioned by Wikipedia, isn't it...... Dim. Nor. 86 (talk) 16:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to say Hello Robby :) Dim. Nor. 86 (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I actually go by "Robbie" these days so you got it right by accident. ;-)

I didn't look into "the inexplicable reversions" because my point is you should try to stay calm even if you feel unfairly treated.

Disagreements and reversions happen all the time on Wikipedia. There have been many reversions I found "inexplicable" at first, there have been many times I've felt unfairly treated. As editors we need to find a way deal with these situations. Try to calmly discuss your changes with the editors that have reverted you. Avoid name calling, assume good faith. The suggestions in the "Avoiding incivility" section at WP:CIVIL are very good. I try to stick to them and it usually helps. Same with those in "Dealing with incivility", especially point number 6: "No matter how much you're being provoked, resist the temptation to snap back. It never works; it just makes things worse. Strive to become the editor who can't be baited."

If sticking to those suggestions doesn't work, there are venues where you can ask other editors to mediate. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice and your kindness. I think it is better for me to stop contributing to Wikipedia. Take care my friend :-) Dim. Nor. 86 (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I'm sorry you feel that way. If you change your mind, don't hesitate to ask for help. All the best, Robby.is.on (talk) 14:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Incivility from User:Dim. Nor. 86. Thank you. – Pee Jay 13:58, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye hypocrete lier. You don't care about wikipedia at all. You keep reverting valid edits ON PURPOSE because you do not like MESSI. SIMPLE AS THAT

GOODBYE LOSER Dim. Nor. 86 (talk) 14:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Annh07. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Leagues Cup, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 00:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]