User talk:HoodedBeast09

Welcome

Hello, Da'HoodedBeast, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

December 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Novena have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Novena was changed by Da'HoodedBeast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865286 on 2023-12-19T15:44:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Da'HoodedBeast! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any improvement. A single source, once cited, is nowhere near enough to either establish notability or support the draft contents.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft is written in a casual and promotional tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (Card Game) (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Five Crowns (Card Game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (Card Game) (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Five Crowns (Card Game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 06:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You did not change the submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 01:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Palindrome Dates

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Palindrome Dates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Litanies Podcast

Hello HoodedBeast09,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Litanies Podcast for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Safari Scribe,

I made a Wikipedia page called Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast). Do you know how long it'll take to get approved or disapproved?

Thanks! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 00:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking pages

Hello @HoodedBeast09, when you create a page in error like you did to Litanies Podcast, do not blank it, rather, tag it with {{db-g7}}. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I think I made that by accident, is it possible to delete it? Same with the tag "Uncovering the Litanies," I made that by accident is it possible that that mistake could be deleted?

Thanks HoodedBeast09 (talk) 12:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uncovering the Litanies

A tag has been placed on Category:Uncovering the Litanies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! HoodedBeast09, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (card game) (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Five Crowns (card game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use an edit summary

Hey HoodedBeast09, Welcome to Wikipedia. I undid a bunch of stuff you did recently because you didn't explain why you made the changes. Edit summaries are how us editors communicate with each other. Without that it's harder to tell if an editor is trying to make the encyclopedia better or just messing around. I hope to see you around doing good work, and I wanted to tell you why I undid some of your work which I couldn't tell was good. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 00:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NSONG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous decline still stands. YouTube videos and the band's website do not contribute towards establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in 2025 (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Wikipedia is not WP:CRYSTALBALL, we don't know if any of these will be canonised, or when.

Also, the lead states that this is a list of 17 beati, whereas I only count four. Is this still work-in-progress?

Am I missing something?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of saints canonized in 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi HoodedBeast09. Thank you for your work on St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation). Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I'm not sure there's a need for this page, as "St. John Paul the Great" is exclusively used to refer to Pope John Paul II.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's fine.

Thanks for letting me know! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me delete it? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moriwen:Okay, that's fine.

Thanks for letting me know! Could you help me delete it? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For sure! And please feel free to create a redirect from St. John Paul the Great to Pope John Paul II, you're totally right that that's a plausible search term.— Moriwen (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. — Moriwen (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(That one's an automated message, lol.) — Moriwen (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in the 21st century has been accepted

List of saints canonized in the 21st century, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in 2025 (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was:

Same reason as before, blatant violation of WP:CRYSTALBALL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of saints canonized in 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Draft:Anne-Gabrielle Caron, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast)

Hello HoodedBeast09, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CFA}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A 💬 02:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is there anyway to undelete my article, Uncovering the Litanies (podcast) so I can edit it?

Thanks!

HoodedBeast09 (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bright Lights

Hi, you had created a draft article for "Bright Lights". It had been declined twice but you still decided to move it to mainspace yourself despite the concerns presented to you. You then attempted to create two identical versions with non-standard naming conventions which were redirected back to the draft page and removed from mainspace. Please attempt to revise the draft using more reliable sources, and let a reviewer assess the article and perform the move if accepted. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! Thank you! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 00:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Five Crowns (card game)

The article Five Crowns (card game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, is reliant on primary sources (i.e. PlayMonster, and Amazon.com) or unreliable sources (i.e. YouTube, Ludiologists.com, and Bar Games 101).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in the 20th century has been accepted

List of saints canonized in the 20th century, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OhHaiMark were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I delete my Uncovering the Litanies page?

Hi, my page Uncovering the Litanies was deleted recently. However, when you search, Uncovering the Litanies on Google, it still comes up as a Wikipedia page. But when you click on it, it says that the page doesn't exist. Is it possible to delete that from the search engines? I just want to make Wikipedia fully usable for all and don't want any dead end pages for your website. Thanks! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pints with Aquinas

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pints with Aquinas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I noticed that you changed the personal pronouns of an individual in the article Dylan Mulvaney. Wikipedia refers to all people, including transgender and nonbinary people, by the pronouns they have most recently requested for themselves; this applies to all phases of their lives, unless they have requested otherwise. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DanielRigal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of religion and spirituality podcasts have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Do you have a conflict of interests here? I saw that you have uploaded an image of the presenter of the same podcast tagged as your "own work". DanielRigal (talk) 18:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitting without improvement will lead to rejection.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! HoodedBeast09, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HoodedBeast09,

I just wanted to let you know that posting questions on your own User talk page will not result in any responses. What are the chances that another Wikipedia editor has your talk page on their Watchlist? Practically zero. If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, go to a forum like the Teahouse where editors are available to respond to your queries. I only happened to see your question because I came here about an expiring draft you have but that was purely by coincidence. Try the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Longest NFL Field Goals (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at field goal instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject already covered on the main field goal article. Please issue a split request if you think it needs to be a completely separate article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Longest NFL Field Goals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Longest NFL Games (November 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Remsense was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Consider integrating into an existing article, like Overtime (sports)#Longest games.

Remsense ‥ 论 06:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense

Hi, it looks like my article was declined. They said it was too much like the Overtime (sports) article but it only has a couple of overtime games in its article. I have all the double overtime games in my article. I believe my article should be accepted because it has more info for a different purpose. Thanks HoodedBeast09 (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not substantial enough to be its own article. Like I directly told you above, the amount of information it does have can be added to another article instead. Remsense ‥ 论 13:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense

Oh, gotcha. Thanks for your time! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

patrick mahomes

yo mr silent guy, any reason why you're adamant in that photo of mahomes? That photo doesn't have him centered at all and it looks like hes about to sneeze. the other photo is completely fine HappyBoi3892 (talk) 00:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HappyBoi3892

Hey, sorry. I accidentally added that and couldn't find the original picture to change it back.

Thanks for changing it back though! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 04:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]