User talk:Chrisdavenport91

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chris Davenport, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chris Davenport was changed by Chrisdavenport91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952826 on 2011-03-01T21:37:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lexington, Virginia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lexington, Virginia was changed by Chrisdavenport91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920845 on 2011-03-01T21:43:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sigma Phi Epsilon. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Greenpeace, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Greenpeace was changed by Chrisdavenport91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894016 on 2011-03-01T21:45:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sigma Phi Epsilon, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sigma Phi Epsilon was changed by Chrisdavenport91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96832 on 2011-03-01T21:46:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Davenport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Davenport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Davenport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Chrisdavenport91) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to impersonate Chris Davenport. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. --Lambiam 22:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]