User talk:Cena.aly

Welcome!

Hello, Cena.aly, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:ReVanced Extended, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ReVanced Extended

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ReVanced Extended, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, Cena.aly. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:ReVanced Extended has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat, as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cena.aly. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cena.aly. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cena.aly|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. per you message on my talk page about consulting an expert. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Cena.aly, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cena.aly|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do that for me? I,m Not paid by Anyone, whatever edit you want just do that, I have no issue Cena.aly (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is your association with the "ReVanced" thing you are editing about, which has been the only subject of your edits and that those edits have promoted? 331dot (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don,t have Any association with them, I found that recourse while searching on Google and found that its a working version, so that is why i edited that Cena.aly (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

as you have removed this then i want you to fix this in a way that is okay with wikipedia, I think I did enough from my end Cena.aly (talk) 10:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you new to Wikipedia? You did some very advanced editing for a new user. Whether you are associated with them or not, your text was promotional in the extreme and has been deleted. If you want to pursue writing about this you will need to start fresh with radically different approach; instead of writing the text first, you should first gather at least three independent reliable sources choose on their own to say about this subject(no press releases, brief mentions, interviews, any materials from the makers of this YouTube mod) and that illustrate what is notable about it, as Wikipedia defines notability. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why don,t you do that? Cena.aly (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest in writing an article about this topic. If you do, it is incumbent upon you to learn how to do it correctly. We usually recommend that instead of diving right in to article creation that new users first edit existing articles for awhile(weeks if not months or longer) to gain experience and knowledge. Using the new user tutorial is also helpful. 331dot (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i was interested in the topic but you removed the post, now tell me why you removed the post if you don,t have interest in the topic. How you can say its advertisement, if you don't know about the topic Cena.aly (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft just tells about the product and its features. That's considered advertising on Wikipedia. I don't have to want to write an article about the subject to know that. As this is a volunteer project I am free to participate in any topic to the degree that I wish. An article must summarize what independent reliable sources say about the topic and what makes it notable in the opinion of those sources. Your draft doesn't do that. As I said, you will need to radically change your approach and rewrite the draft. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do Me Favor

'''ReVanced Extended''' is a modified version of the YouTube app for Android devices that offers users additional features and customization options. It has garnered attention from users seeking an enhanced video viewing experience. The application allows users to block ads, play videos in the background, download videos for offline viewing, and customize various aspects of the interface.

Notability: ReVanced Extended has received coverage and recognition from multiple independent sources. These sources highlight the unique features and functionalities that distinguish ReVanced Extended from the official YouTube app.

Feature Highlights: One notable feature of ReVanced Extended is the ad-blocking capability, allowing users to enjoy YouTube videos without interruptions. It also includes SponsorBlock, a feature that enables users to skip sponsor content, intros, outros, and reminders in videos.

Additionally, ReVanced Extended offers enhanced customization options, such as the ability to adjust video quality, enable automatic video replay, and control brightness and volume through swiping gestures. Users can also download videos for offline viewing, a feature that is not available in the official YouTube app.

Reception and Community Impact: ReVanced Extended has gained a significant following within the Android user community. It has received positive feedback for its ad-blocking capabilities, enhanced customization features, and improved user experience. Many users appreciate the ability to personalize their video viewing and the convenience of offline video downloads.

Reliability and Official Support: It's important to note that ReVanced Extended is not an official app developed or supported by YouTube. As with any modified application, users should exercise caution and download the app from reliable sources to ensure security and avoid potential compatibility issues. While ReVanced Extended has gained popularity, it is not officially endorsed or supported by YouTube, and any troubleshooting or technical issues may not be addressed by YouTube's support channels.

Conclusion: ReVanced Extended is an Android application that offers advanced features and customization options for YouTube users. It has received recognition from independent sources and has gained a dedicated user base due to its ad-blocking capabilities, enhanced customization features, and offline video downloading functionality. However, it is important to note that ReVanced Extended is not an official YouTube app and may not have the same level of support or security guarantees.

Check this Content, do you this is okay with wikipedia Guidelines? Cena.aly (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please reread the deletion notice I left you. This is promotional content. How'd your "consulting an expert" thing you mentioned on my talk page pan out. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay What do you say about this new content? Cena.aly (talk) 13:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the old content. Please feel free to request restoration of the deleted draft at WP:deletion review Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What @331dot: said. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fancy Refrigerator: Speaking of experts, could you spare us a moment to opine about the above proposed content? Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cena.aly: There are links in the deletion notice I left where you can get help from the experts. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It still reads like an advertisement. I don’t think a YouTube ad-blocker for Android is sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not an improvement. You're still just telling about the app and its features. You mention "reception and community impact" but offer no independent reliable sources that document what the reception and community impact is. You give your views as to what that might be, but that's not what we are looking for. I don't think this app meets the criteria for an article, sorry. 331dot (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:YouTube ReVanced Extended

Hello, Cena.aly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:YouTube ReVanced Extended, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]