User talk:Carmenmargothillebrand

This is Carmenmargothillebrand's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Academy of Cytology (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Academy of Cytology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Carmenmargothillebrand! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nagol0929 (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Will be in touch! Carmenmargothillebrand (talk) 11:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nagol,

I have reworked the article and added external references and hope this will meet your standards.

Thanks a lot for your feedback.

Best wishes,

Carmen Carmenmargothillebrand (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Carmenmargothillebrand I removed most of the drafts content due to it being unencyclopedic or advertising. But it is now an article. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I am glad you accepted the article :-) Carmenmargothillebrand (talk) 12:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nagol,

I don't want to bother, but why did you delete the scientific publications the IAC published together with the WHO? I thought this undermined the credibility of the IAC...

Best,

Carmen Carmenmargothillebrand (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it’s inherently not encyclopedic due to it just being a list of publications. The purpose of articles is to state the facts and not list the ambiguous accomplishments of a subject. Nagol0929 (talk) 13:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, understood. Thanks that you took the time to explain. Carmenmargothillebrand (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Academy of Cytology has been accepted

International Academy of Cytology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nagol0929 (talk) 12:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your edit to International Academy of Cytology has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:European Women's Management Development Network, from its old location at User:Carmenmargothillebrand/EWMD. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 16:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, Sam :-) Carmenmargothillebrand (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Women's Management Development Network (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tesleemah were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

OK, the subject appears notable however the references are 90% primary sources with few empty links. Also having something like objectives, goals etc seems like an essay. A more brief and impactful contribution of the Society will do. Having fixing all these, do resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Women's Management Development Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 05:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]