User talk:Capetien

Welcome!

Hello, Capetien, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ndum, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NativeForeigner (talk) 06:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ndum

The article Ndum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information already in Nkom

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NativeForeigner (talk) 06:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary definitions

Please do not add definitions of terms in other languages to disambiguation pages. If anywhere, such entries belong on wikitionary. older ≠ wiser 07:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To expand, I'm sure that our sister project, Wiktionary, would love to have the information that you are adding, but it is not really appropriate for an encyclopaedia. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nkin

The article Nkin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

foreign language vocabulary entry with no indication of potential for expansion -- WP is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 09:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Bankon language has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jovianeye (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Nkon. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Specs112 (Talk!) 23:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Bankon language, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 00:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bankon language. Jovianeye (talk) 00:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bisama

The article Bisama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, original research per WP:NOR, nothing about the subject online.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 14:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research and synthesis

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Bankon language, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MuffledThud (talk • contribs)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Bankon language, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MuffledThud (talk) 08:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Capetien for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. MuffledThud (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked 1 week for sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 23:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.