User talk:CandleWickipedia

Attempting to recreate salted articles

Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the answer. I will save my wikipedia page on Google Docs for my own personal reading, but I understand why I am not allowed to post is here. You have a great day, and I will keep this in mind next time I make an article.

Sincerely, CandleWickipedia CandleWickipedia (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

post it* here. Sorry for the typo. CandleWickipedia (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waste Pro USA (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only WP:Secondary coverage is about the event of the death.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waste Pro USA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 01:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. I will edit my Waste Pro article to meet the criteria and resubmit it some time. Have a good night. CandleWickipedia (talk) 02:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MicrobiologyMarcus. After doing more research on Waste Pro, there were hardly any articles to use on the company. Now I know why it didn't have it's own Wikipedia page in the first place lol. I will save the article in my Google Docs for my own personal reading, but will delete it off of Wikipedia. Thank you again, Mr. Marcus, and have a great day. CandleWickipedia (talk) 14:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CandleWickipedia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 01:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Usedtobecool. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on That Vegan Teacher, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Usedtobecool. I'll add a source next time I make a revision to the article 👍 CandleWickipedia (talk) 04:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: El Talento del Bloque (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:El Talento del Bloque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit confused. There is an article about this album in Spanish on Wikipedia, all I did was translate it to English so I don't see why mine isn't accepted. There are also other English Wikipedia articles on albums that just say the album, release date, track listing and billboard placement that have been accepted. I'm not upset by the way, I'm just confused. CandleWickipedia (talk) 06:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for leaving me hanging and not helping out. CandleWickipedia (talk) 19:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You never answered my reply/question. Please do as I am still confused after listing my reasons why this article should be accepted. Thank you. CandleWickipedia (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cr1TiKaL—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Waste Pro USA

Hello, CandleWickipedia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Waste Pro USA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Sir MemeGod. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Hurricane Milton that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While they may have vandalized the page, that does not give others the permission to call them "idiots". Sir MemeGod  17:24, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Milton heads up

Hey there CandleWickipedia! First off, I think your user name is great. Second off, just wanted to give you a heads up that I totally get where you came from with your edit to the infobox, changing the 30000000000 to $30 billion, but the way coding works with the infobox, it's better to list as a number. For instance, Google often gets its information from Wikipedia infobox, so standard formatting is the preferred way of handling things like the infobox. I hope that makes sense for why your edits were reverted. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the clarification, I thought it got vandalized so that's why i did it. I understand now so thank you, and also thank you for the compliment about my username lol CandleWickipedia (talk) 23:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hah of course on both fronts. It can feel a little scary on here when you feel like you're doing something wrong, but have no idea why. There are a lot of rules and established procedures for a ton of aspects of articles, some of which can be found in the manual of style, or sometimes it's the precedent of a certain type of article (like how hurricane articles have evolved over the years). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: El Talento del Bloque (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not resubmit without improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:El Talento del Bloque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Man Down (album) (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears to be a WP:TOOSOON case. Not meeting WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG currently.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Man Down (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 17:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]