Jump to content

User talk:Calistemon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Calistemon1)

Happy New Year, Calistemon!

[edit]
Happy New Year!

Calistemon,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 16:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 16:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm

[edit]

There are westdales everywhere, as for west dale the trove refs tend to have beverly as a qualifier, sigh... JarrahTree 05:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Both Landgate and Nationalmap maps have the locality as Westdale. We had two wikidata items for it as well, which I merged. Less clear is Kokeby, Western Australia and Mount Kokeby, Western Australia, in the same shire. Two ore one place? Two wikidata items for now. Calistemon (talk) 08:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The kokeby certainly the same... JarrahTree 09:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New State Register of Heritage places

[edit]

The Goldfields Water Supply Scheme is now on the State Register of Heritage Places, although I'm unsure if its the entire pipeline. The map on the inHerit entry confused me; it has just highlighted a square in Merredin. I'll leave it up to you to update the lists.

Djuringe Mooranoppin in Kellerberrin has also been added to the register recently, see [1] and [2]. Steelkamp (talk) 08:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Steelkamp:, going throught the lists and updating them is on my to do list as the next item. Calistemon (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
GWSS listing :is intriguing:

Location Details

Contains the main reservoirs: Mundaring Weir (Dam) and Mount Charlotte Reservoir; the main conduit of the pipeline (including all locking bar pipe, wood stave pipe and continuously welded pipe) which stretches 560km from Mundaring in the west to Kalgoorlie in the east; the remaining six of the eight original pump stations (Nos 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8) including remaining equipment; the remaining four associated holding tanks (located at Steam Pump Stations Nos, 2, 4, 7 and 8); and the four regulating tanks located at Bakers Hill, West Northam; Bullabulling and Toorak Hill

That is a lot of stuff in the location JarrahTree 11:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess they had to list it under a location and the place of origin was probably the best option. The child places are then registered under their respective location, No. 6 Steam Pumping Station (fmr), Ghooli under Yilgarn, No 3 Pumping Station under Cunderdin, and so on. Calistemon (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
but the totality of all the different lga's ! there is a lot that it is all in JarrahTree 11:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Steelkamp and JarrahTree: Interesting that the Goldfields Water Supply Scheme is listed under the Shire of Mundaring on the entry but also appears on the Kellerberrin State heritage list as well as on the Yilgarn one. Without having checking all of the ones it runs through right now I suspect it is listed under all of them, which would make perfect sense. Calistemon (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Northern Territory Sign.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Northern Territory Sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SV Oberachern.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SV Oberachern.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TSV Aubstadt.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TSV Aubstadt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thornlie line tunnel images

[edit]

Hey Calistemon, I have taken some photos of the Beckenham tunnel for the Thornlie line, which I have added to the Thornlie line article. These photos are taken from the Dulwich Street level crossing and the Albany Highway bridge. Problem is I just use my phone camera, which is not good for zoomed in photos. I was wondering if you would be able to take better photos than me? That would be really useful for the Thornlie line article which I am working on. Steelkamp (talk) 05:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Steelkamp: It's a little out of the way from my usual "photographic range" around Rockingham, Kwinana and Cockburn. In the next few weeks I probably won't be able to go up there because of work and family commitments. At some point, after that, I would probably be able to just catch the train, take my bike and go on a photo trip. So, sadly, not right now but maybe in a few weeks time. Calistemon (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. This isn't urgent. A few weeks won't hurt. I just want to get the Dulwich Street level crossing one done before the Armadale line shutdown on 20 November, as that area is going to be elevated. If you can't get that photo by then, please let me know. Thanks, Steelkamp (talk) 05:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Steelkamp: Will try but just send me a reminder in 4 weeks time. I got family visiting from Europe so I'm going to be tied down a bit until then. Calistemon (talk) 06:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Steelkamp (talk) 06:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Steelkamp: Do you still require the images? If yes, I may have an opportunity to go there today. Calistemon (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please, I do. Steelkamp (talk) 23:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Steelkamp: I have placed the images I have taken today in Commons:Category:October 2023 in rail transport in Western Australia but I'm a little skeptical as to whether they are good enough to use. There was a fair bit of heat coming off the track, making them a bit blurred. Have a look and see what you think. Calistemon (talk) 10:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've added File:Armadale Line viewed from pedestrian crossing near Beckenham Station, Western Australia, October 2023 08.jpg to the Thornlie line article. Its better than the previous photo and the heat distortion isn't bad at the size used in the article. The tunnel is now easily visible. Thanks for the photos! Steelkamp (talk) 02:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sincere apologies

[edit]

I was corrected in my misunderstanding of the development of government lines in the bunbury region - please see my notes on an emailed pdf... it should explain most of the oddities

Picton to Boyanup - was an isolated line between 1887-1891
Perth to Bunbury - was connected in 1893
Boyanup to Busselton - was connected in 1894 during the Forrest era public works construction
Boyanup was 1894-1920s signposted as 'Boyanup Junction'
Boyanup Junction was the final point of the Flinders Bay line, technically from the 1920s to the 1950s...

I was able to access 1900 era maps of the era, might add to commons to use... apologies that I had misled you - I got quite a few things wrong!!! JarrahTree 11:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, hope you are trying to update the relevant articles, where required. Calistemon (talk) 11:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hope to correct my mistakes. I am also hoping to ascertain which of the annual report items might be useful or not. However, I am always slow on the uptake. JarrahTree 11:56, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RC Luxembourg.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RC Luxembourg.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TSV Schott Mainz.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TSV Schott Mainz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody FINALLY got around to uploading to Wikimedia Commons a logo identical to one you uploaded here yonks ago.

[edit]

Proposed deletion of File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a logo identical to this .jpg exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1._FC_Bruchsal.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 01:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1. FC Bruchsal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow - three years later

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_State_Register_of_Heritage_Places_in_the_Shire_of_Wyalkatchem&oldid=1015776335 intriguing it didnt get picked up then - trust you are having a safe easter wherever you are JarrahTree 06:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox rail line

[edit]

I think Arc Infrastructure should be listed as the owner, not the operator of each railway line. Template:Infobox rail line says that the operator parameter is for the "Operator(s) of services on the line". This would mean Aurizon for most of the Wheatbelt railway lines, as Arc Infrastructure doesn't run any trains and only maintains the tracks and provides access to operators. Steelkamp (talk) 07:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Steelkamp: I think you have far more insight into this topic than I have. I have focused more on the historical side of things, I have to say. Are you happy to update and fix as required? I see you already have done so at Wagin to Newdegate railway line. Calistemon (talk) 11:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm happy to fix as required. The main thing to remember going forward is that Arc Infrastructure should be put in the "owner" parameter of the infobox, not the "operator" parameter.
By the way, I see you've gotten the hang of making those route templates! Steelkamp (talk) 12:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I dont think each line necessarily needs that sort of treatment - it should be centralised somewhere, the general trend for all the separate wheatbelt railway lines to get the information repeated seems a bit over doing it. The fact the information is current with limited pre-Brookfield/Arc information is potentially overdone, as PTA although quite comprehensive in the information is not the full story on operational history of some of the wheatbelt lines. JarrahTree 12:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did a little once I had the one you started for me as a guide. It also became easier once I realised that it is all in German! When I realised that BHF stood for Bahnhof and HST for Haltestelle and so on it all became a lot clearer. Calistemon (talk) 12:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Western Australian railway-related acts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kwinana, Western Australia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

[edit]

The changing identity of the location on the great southern railway at:

  • Lakeside (there were multiple localities in WA with the name)
  • Torbay Junction 1897 - 1921
  • Elleker 1921 - current

some localities are more complicated than this... JarrahTree 13:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Railways

[edit]

Thanks for your work on the WA railway articles - really interesting reading and very thorough research :). Re the Meekatharra-Horseshoe Railway, I notice that Horseshoe, Western Australia, exists as an article and possibly would be a better spot for the railway details than the Peak Hill article. However I'm also not 100% certain that the Horseshoe goldfields townsite of the 1890s is one and the same as the manganese mine of the 1920s. I T B F 💬 02:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Horseshoe mine of the 1890s is not the same as the 1920s Horseshoe locality, correct. A close reading of trove entries will show that. Thanks for your support and interest. JarrahTree 05:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the section I have added to the Peak Hill article is becoming to large and should be moved but I'm not sure of which title too. Railway or mine? By the looks of it, the mine never actually produced much so maybe the railway? Calistemon (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Army Germany rugby union team

[edit]
Notice

The article British Army Germany rugby union team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PAWPERSO (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Calistemon&oldid=1258968494"