User talk:Cabj1905

Unsourced material

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to UFC 145. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 07:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Nyttend, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Nyttend (talk) 12:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've referred this to ANI for a 3rd opinion, becaues I don't feel comfortable acting unilaterally right now. Here is the link to what I posted; you can comment there in response. Sorry to drag this out and thanks for your patience. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 15:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3rd opinion Let me offer this: Scores shouldn't be put on any MMA article (or any sports article, for that matter) unless there is a citation from a reliable source. This is part of WP:V and isn't optional. The reason we insist on this is that it would be too easy for someone to jump on here, add fake scores, and mislead people. Lots of people depend on the info at Wikipedia, and depend on it being correct and verified. I'm sure your additions are correct and that you wouldn't do this, but just like in MMA events, we have rules (policies, really), and one of them says you have to provide sources for any fact that someone contests. In the future, you really must provide sources if you add this material. Wikipedia doesn't have to be updated in real time, sherdog and the blogs can do that. Our goal is to document what the reliable sources say happened after the fact, backed up with links TO those sources. Dennis Brown ® © 16:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]