User talk:BernetFot

October 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Glassjaw, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glassjaw

I undid your edit to Glassjaw as it was 1) removed sourced content and 2) it was unreferenced. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. To add a reference, please read Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. There is a tool that can help: See wp:RefToolbar/2.0. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Your edits are saved in the wp:page history. Please add references when you restore the content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 18:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of your own knowledge is "original research" and should not be used on Wikipedia per wp:No original research. Jim1138 (talk) 18:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With most articles, one would discuss the issue(s) on the talk page such as talk:Glassjaw. However, I don't think any two people can agree on a list of genres for a rock group or album. It appears the list for Glassjaw has metamorphosed over the years. I really don't care what the list is as long as it is cited per wp:v. Jim1138 (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Outrage! Is Now, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DFA1979 edit

I removed incorrect material from the page and added accurate information with sources. I don't see much wrong in that. BernetFot (talk) 13:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Outrage! Is Now, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DFA 1979 Outrage! Is Now

The only one making disruptive edits is you. If you continue your childish vandalism on the Outrage! Is Now page I will report you. I removed inaccurate information and replaced it with cited material that can be backed up beyond just the cited evidence. If you want to be an adult about this and talk further feel free to respond. Thanks BernetFot (talk) 18:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]