User talk:Arceus2072
|
The article Yulecon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No significant coverage by reliable and independent sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Esw01407 (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yulecon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulecon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Esw01407 (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yulecon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Altaïr (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Yulecon reply
[edit]Hello, The reason I've nominated Yulecon for deletion is there seems to be an lack of notability for the event, along with a lack of coverage by independent sources (newspapers, TV, even Anime News Network). Animecons.com, while for now it can be used as a source, it doesn't establish notability as just about any con can be listed on there. My best suggestion would be to try to find more sources from what I've listed above. Esw01407 (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- There's no guarantee the article is going to be deleted, my suggestion would be to work on the article more now if you can find more reliable sources, and that if the AFD is successful, ask for the article to be userfyed to your account where you can continue working on it for later re-addition. Esw01407 (talk) 22:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Best answer I have would be again, if its deleted, ask the person who's doing it to userfy a copy to your account and keep working. Esw01407 (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- If the article is deleted, ask the user who handles the removal. Also, remember to sign your posts with four tildes ~. Esw01407 (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- At the time we started our conversation, it didn't have many votes for deletion, but now it does. Esw01407 (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- If the article is deleted, ask the user who handles the removal. Also, remember to sign your posts with four tildes ~. Esw01407 (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Best answer I have would be again, if its deleted, ask the person who's doing it to userfy a copy to your account and keep working. Esw01407 (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)