User talk:AnnieCR 1991

Hello, AnnieCR 1991, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chris Wilson (pollster) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chris Wilson (pollster). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Wilson (pollster) (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference, the 50 plus instances need to be replaced with wiki links

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Wilson (pollster) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chris Wilson (pollster), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AnnieCR 1991! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Wilson (pollster) (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references are from his company's website. Please list the articles that show he will meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Wilson (pollster) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chris Wilson (pollster), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryon Allen (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:AnnieCR 1991/sandbox/Bryon Allen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:AnnieCR 1991/sandbox/Bryon Allen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Muir (political consultant) (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references. Do not resubmit this draft without references. See WP:Markup for how to mark section headings. Section headings are delimited by equal signs (=), which are used to construct the table of contents of a page. Please edit this draft as specified before resubmitting. Do not use nowiki on headings.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Muir (political consultant) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alex Muir (political consultant), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Todd Vitale (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

{subse:seemark

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Todd Vitale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Todd Vitale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reformat the headings correctly before resubmitting.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required declarations.|sig=yes}}

AfC notification: User:AnnieCR 1991/sandbox/Ashlee Rich Stephenson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:AnnieCR 1991/sandbox/Ashlee Rich Stephenson. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bryon Allen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bryon Allen. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Byron Allen, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:AnnieCR 1991, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AnnieCR 1991|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Todd Vitale, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:AnnieCR 1991, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AnnieCR 1991|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:WPA Intelligence

Draft:WPA Intelligence, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:WPA Intelligence and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:WPA Intelligence during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

creating articles

Hi, AnnieCR 1991, it looks like you're having a pretty frustrating time.

What I would suggest is that you read the page at WP:RELIABLE and then find all the sources you can that are both 1. reliable and 2. provide significant coverage -- that is, not just a bare mention of the company -- and list links to them here. I'll help you assess them to see if the company actually is notable. Not all companies are notable, and it's especially unlikely when the company is fairly new.

The likelihood that many people working at the company are notable is pretty small; unless there have been multiple articles covering a person in depth in a reliable source, they simply aren't notable for our purposes. The likelihood there's more than one or two notable people in any small company is slim-to-none. You can find guidelines for determining the notability of people at WP:PEOPLE if you really think one of the company's employees is actually notable, but to start with let's find out if the company itself is even notable. valereee (talk) 11:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Wilson (pollster)

Hello, AnnieCR 1991. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chris Wilson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 02:45, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]