User talk:Alekborodina

A page you started (Liudmila Titova, Russian Ballerina) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Liudmila Titova, Russian Ballerina, Alekborodina!

Wikipedia editor TheMagikCow just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

All good. Well done.

To reply, leave a comment on TheMagikCow's talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Alekborodina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 16:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Dougan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Dougan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 17:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gentlemen's Order of the Dark Mask (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gentlemen's Order of the Dark Mask and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Alekborodina, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John M. Dougan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John M. Dougan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:John M Dougan 2015.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:John M Dougan 2015.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.quora.com/Are-Vladimir-Putins-shirts-suits-and-shoes-Russian-or-foreign. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 01:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John M. Dougan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John M. Dougan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John M. Dougan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your ArbCom Request

Hello I just wanted to stop by and give some friendly advice. I think your ArbCom Request is extremely premature, think of ArbCom as the supreme court they only deal with things which have been inadequately dealt with in the lower courts, such as WP:ANI. So far the only steps taken have been a discussion amongst yourselves which is admirable and the correct first step, but the next step is to gather community input at ANI, before jumping to the top of the justice system in Wikipedia. I have no opinion on anything which happened between you two and have no interest in getting involved, but thought I would try and drop a friendly note here suggesting withdrawing the request at ArbCom and filing it at ANI instead (I'm pretty sure this will end up being the case anyway, ArbCom doesn't normally take cases if the lower court has seen it yet). McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. I appreciate the friendly note; I am always willing to listen to to experience; I only wish reddogsix would do the same. Forgive me, but I am not sure what ANI means. Frankly, I am incredibly frustrated at Wikipedia and I don't see the point in writing in the future for this site. I'm sure there are many others that feel the same, and people like Reddogsix are going to infuriate so many beginner users, that when it comes time for people like him, and you, to leave Wikipedia, there's going to be no one left to give a damn about the site.

I will withdraw the complaint. Aleksandra E. Borodina (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) To clarify: "ANI" refers to the administrators' noticeboard for incidents—see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. It is a centralized location where a wide variety of user conduct issues may be brought to the attention of Wikipedia administrators and discussed. A community consensus at ANI has the authority to impose editing restrictions, up to and including a site-ban. The first step in dispute resolution is always to communicate directly with the editors with whom you have a dispute. If that fails to achieve a resolution, ANI is typically the next step to receive broader input in a user conduct dispute. As McMatter stated, a request for arbitration is the last step for resolving a user conduct dispute, to be employed when all other dispute resolution methods have failed. Mz7 (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PBSOTalk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PBSOTalk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBSOTalk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ballerina Liudmila Titova.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ballerina Liudmila Titova.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BadVolf

The article BadVolf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable hacker. Article fails to provide notability for article subject. References fail to mention the article subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 01:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BadVolf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BadVolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BadVolf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration request declined

Hello Alekborodina, this is a message to inform you that 706204596#Reddogsix|a request for Arbitration that you were involved in has been declined by vote of the Arbitration Committee. For the Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 21:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gentlemen's Order of the Dark Mask

Hello, Alekborodina. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gentlemen's Order of the Dark Mask".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:John M. Dougan.jpg

The file File:John M. Dougan.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]