User talk:Akumar19

Welcome!

Hello, Akumar19, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Turing Research, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Praxidicae (talk) 00:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Turing Research

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Turing Research, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://turing.cos.gmu.edu/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 00:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Akumar19 -- I've deleted this article because it was a copyright violation. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and you must never simply cut and paste in text from the internet! Feel free to restart the article, but write in your own words based on the source instead. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello Akumar19. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Akumar19. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Akumar19|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae!

I am not employed or paid by the Turing Research Institute, I am simply a member. Is that alright?

Then how is the logo you uploaded your own work? Praxidicae (talk) 01:33, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The logo I have uploaded is not my own work, but I have been given permission by the founder to use it and create a Wikipedia page. This Institute is not formally established yet (with paid members, etc). It is simply an organization of students and faculty who want to publish scientific literature together.

You have a conflict of interest and as such are not permitted to move it to mainspace yourself. I suggest you move it back before it's deleted. Praxidicae (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also it's a conflict of interest to cite your own work, so stop. Praxidicae (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of the following articles are my work. The London School of Economics article mentions the Turing Group (link: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/02/17/the-use-of-robots-and-artificial-intelligence-in-war/). They are also mentioned in the following workshop paper, https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08670. The group also has a LinkedIn page at https://www.linkedin.com/company/turing-research/. It is a funded institute. I'm an avid AI enthusiast, and I thought Wikipedia needs to be updated with more AI groups in the United States.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Need eyes on an AfD. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020} 21:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Turing Research

The article Turing Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this is nothing more than original research, TR isn't an institute, it's a research group and all the sources that even make mention of it are just bylines by the authors, which are self published by the page creator. The rest of the sources make no mention of "turing Research"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Praxidicae (talk) 21:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User: Akumar19. I'm an avid AI enthusiast, and I thought Wikipedia needs to be updated with more AI groups in the United States. Many of the papers are published prior to 2019, which is the year of the group establishment. All 2020 publications have the group name.

Nomination of Turing Research for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turing Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turing Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]