User talk:Aaryajin88

Cetacean
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Artiodactyla
Infraorder:	Cetacea
Families, genera and species, subspecies
	Balaenopteridae (Rorquals) Genus: Balaenoptera B. acutorostrata; B. bonaerensis; B. borealis; B. brydei & B. edeni; B. musculus B. m. brevicauda; ; B. omurai; B. physalus B. p. quoyi; B. p. physalus; ; B. ricei; ; Genus: Eschrichtius E. robustus; ; Genus: Megaptera M. novaeangliae; ; ;

Cobra
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Reptilia
Order:	Squamata
Suborder:	Serpentes
Superfamily:	Elapoidea
Family:	Elapidae
Genera
	Naja Laurenti, 1768; + more;

Nomination for deletion of Template:CMG

Template:CMG has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Aaryajin88! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandy (actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sandy (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy (choreographer) (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 16:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WUP:AFK

A tag has been placed on WUP:AFK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:CMG

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:CMG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_15. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gonnym (talk) 16:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Section big

Template:Section big has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Numberlink

Template:Numberlink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chevy Corvette C

Template:Chevy Corvette C has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Stage Name

Template:Stage Name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please experiment in your sandbox instead of in Template space

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you have been experimenting with editing, including in the Template space. The best place to do experiments is in User:Aaryajin88/sandbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"SP:EP" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect SP:EP has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5 § SP:EP until a consensus is reached. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Image

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Image requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_30#Template:Infobox_Image. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Image

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Image requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_30#Template:Infobox_Image. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"பாம்பு" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect பாம்பு has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 7 § பாம்பு until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Species with no link

Template:Species with no link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plantdrew (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"7.3984" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 7.3984 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 7 § 7.3984 until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 22:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Basilo" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Basilo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 7 § Basilo until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaryajin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Aaryajin88 (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cobra

Cobra is the name for Venomous snake in the genus Naja.

Link

Rice's whales Aaryajin88 (talk) 14:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dunbar synd.

Dunbar syndrome Aaryajin88 (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaryajin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. Aaryajin88 (talk) 08:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This page is not for posting edits, it is for communication with you. We cannot look into this unless you provide the IP address involved. If you don't want to post it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Link next

Zephie Aaryajin88 (talk) 09:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

l.

Steller's jay Aaryajin88 (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User

Edit summaries

Please use more descriptive edit summaries. Nearly all your summaries have been "Created new article" or "Redirect Page", when clearly that isn't the case. Please see, for instance, my contribution list and you can see how it is much more informative as to what I've done, while yours is not informative at all. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Template:Sample name

Hello, Aaryajin88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Sample name, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Template:Sample name

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Template:Sample name, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm taking your continual use of poor edit summaries to be intentional now since I previously warned you about them. Continue and you may get blocked. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Corma, you may be blocked from editing. UtherSRG (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock reviewed|decline={{unblock reviewed|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~|1=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock now

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaryajin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Aaryajin88 (talk) 08:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, as the block has already expired. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock wikipedia at "9:00" now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaryajin88 (talk • contribs)

Are you going to start using better edit summaries? - UtherSRG (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not changed your behavior after being blocked twice. If you do not start using appropriate edit summaries, I will block you for longer periods of time. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 10:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Corma zelica

Hello, Aaryajin88,

Thank you for creating Corma zelica.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Several of these references don't actually mention Corma zelica, so aren't suitable sources for the claims here.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Famousdog}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Famousdog (woof)(grrr) 17:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock And don't block now

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaryajin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Aaryajin88 (talk) 12:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please block Wikipedia at "10:00" now

May 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 14:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'am so sorry! i wont edit your pages!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaryajin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Aaryajin88 (talk) 15:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaryajin88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Aaryajin88 (talk) 14:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not obviously a WP:CIR failure. Removing TPA. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'am so sorry! i wont edit again

Make the Cephalastor rominae article

You blocked me. so make the: Cephalastor rominae that does not exist Aaryajin88 (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. UtherSRG (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended your block indefinitely. Despite your promise not to edit, you were caught evading your block to continue editing as Lycaenops.wolf. --Yamla (talk) 14:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]