Jump to content

User talk:2A02:3100:3E00:2300:C401:77F:3413:B9A9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CurryTime7-24. I noticed that you recently removed content from K-means clustering without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CurryTime7-24: It is repeated WP:CITESPAM as in my edit summary. See the reverted edit! It's a waste of time to write more than "revert cite Spam"... 2A02:3100:3E00:2300:C401:77F:3413:B9A9 (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/LVA001

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Traffic simulation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 20:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should check the full edit history: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Traffic_simulation&oldid=1258419722 2A02:3100:3E00:2300:C401:77F:3413:B9A9 (talk) 20:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The citation you removed from the section on traffic microsimulation is a scholarly journal titled "Automatic Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models Using Artificial Neural Networks". Can you explain how it's reference spam? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivanvector: Because the user inserted just publications to 10 pages without any text contributions. That is the definition of conflict-of-interest self-cite spam. 2A02:3100:3E00:2300:C401:77F:3413:B9A9 (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you considered that this is perhaps not as obvious as you have declared it to be? You might perhaps see fewer warning messages if you do a better job of explaining what you're doing, because otherwise you look like an anonymous editor going around blanking references, a common form of vandalism. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Citation spamming is the illegitimate or improper use of citations, footnotes, or references. Citation spamming is a form of search engine optimization or promotion that typically involves the repeated insertion of a particular citation or reference in multiple articles by a single contributor. Often these are added not to verify article content, but rather to populate numerous articles with a particular citation. Variations of citation spamming include academics and scientists using their editing privileges primarily to add citations to their own work, and people replacing live or dead URLs with links to commercial sites or their own blogs. Citation spamming is a subtle form of spam and should not be confused with legitimate good-faith additions intended to verify article content and help build the encyclopedia.
@Ivanvector: Now go check out this edit history, it is a prime example of exactly this behavior: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/LVA001
All the references spammed have one author in common, too. So clearly WP:COI also applies. 2A02:3100:3E00:2300:C401:77F:3413:B9A9 (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2A02:3100:3E00:2300:C401:77F:3413:B9A9&oldid=1258457969"