User talk:185.178.71.138

March 2021

Hello, I'm DigitalChutney. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Corticiaceae have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. DigitalChutney (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tattle-Tape. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. DigitalChutney (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bridgetown Vocational College have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bridgetown Vocational College was changed by 185.178.71.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96794 on 2021-03-09T11:52:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Serols (talk) 11:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ballyfermot. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ballyfermot was changed by 185.178.71.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884129 on 2021-03-09T11:56:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 12:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dab (dance)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle ^🔔 17:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Kpddg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Taghmon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 15:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022

Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to George W. Bush shoeing incident—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 00:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to George W. Bush shoeing incident. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fuzheado | Talk 00:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to George W. Bush shoeing incident, you may be blocked from editing. Fuzheado | Talk 00:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fuzheado | Talk 00:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Alfonso de Borbón y Borbón, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 16:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do think you made a mistake because it's a justifiable, constructive edit made in good faith. 185.178.71.138 (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alfonso de Borbón y Borbón, you may be blocked from editing. Bedivere (talk) 16:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would feel as though this is easier discussed on the article's talk page where more users can contribute to the discussion 185.178.71.138 (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alfonso de Borbón y Borbón. Bedivere (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2024

Hello, I'm HirowoWiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Political positions of Javier Milei have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 21:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

womp womp 185.178.71.138 (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: I'm not sure that this was a good block; this IP was reverting disruptive edits by a user who would go on to get themselves blocked for legal threats, as I know you're aware. I'm sure the bright-line cross could have been looked past under WP:3RRNO? ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 14:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello GhostOfDanGurney, thanks for raising this concern. I understand what you mean, but I disagree relatively strongly. 185.178.71.138 has restored content to a biography of a living person without discussion, which by itself is already problematic (WP:BLPRESTORE, WP:ONUS). There is an edit warring exception for the removal of some BLP content, not for its addition. Most legal threats are the result of (misguided) good-faith concerns, so taking them as evidence of vandalism in hindsight would be neither logically nor chronologically correct. Edit warring is disruptive even if it reverts other disruptive edits, and disruptive editing is not a listed exception for a simple reason: Everyone thinks they're right. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the thorough explanation ToBeFree! ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 00:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.