User talk:120.28.64.71

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Paschal mystery has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 07:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Hypertext Transfer Protocol has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2012 (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bfootdav (talk) 14:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mafia Wars, you will be blocked from editing. Falcon8765 (talk) 16:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Ken (name). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Gripe water, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page St. Mary's College of Meycauayan has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Meycauayan-Bulacan/St-Marys-College-of-Meycauayan/114316708585969 (redirect from http://www.mysmcm.com), http://www.facebook.com/pages/Meycauayan-Bulacan/St-Marys-College-of-Meycauayan/114316708585969 (redirect from http://www.mysmcm.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Rusko (musician), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Elation Aviation 00:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fate, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fate was changed by 120.28.64.71 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-05-24T01:26:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at BJ Penn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Paralympiakos (talk) 11:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Eclipse (novel) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 09:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kublai Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 10:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kublai Khan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 03:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

120.28.64.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be able to delete the page I have created.

Decline reason:

Editors are not able to delete pages for a number of reasons: 1) you gave the work to Wikipedia, 2) you do not have the ability to delete a page, only admins do, 3) blanking a page would also be vandalism. As such, there's no good requirement to unblock someone who performs vandalism (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chuck Liddell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 05:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Law of the land. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Anythingyouwant (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Korea. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 12:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Korea. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Davewild (talk) 12:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WVTM-TV, you may be blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 01:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WIAT, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deconstructhis (talk) 01:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Conflict. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Tommyjb (talk) 01:20, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to The Undertaker with this edit, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 17:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of theological demons, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of theological demons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 17:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit tests on President of Kazakhstan

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to President of Kazakhstan was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This is an automated message from 28bot. False positive? Please report it. 28bot (talk) 06:03, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of anime broadcast by Hero, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 16:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to JM De Guzman, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Allens (talk | contribs) 13:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Software was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Regine Velasquez ‎ was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

120.28.64.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

theres no vandalism made on this ip address.

Decline reason:

Looking back at the 5 most recent edits (before the currect request), they look like vandalism. Can you give us a source for that nickname? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

120.28.64.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 11:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2012

You edited the page Portal:Current events/Calendar/2012/304 a few minutes ago. I have undone the edit, since it clearly didn't belong there. What article are you trying to update? -- John of Reading (talk) 10:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Development Bank of the Philippines because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 14:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geronimo Stilton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phineas and Ferb (season 2), you may be blocked from editing. Mojoworker (talk) 05:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Summer Olympics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 20:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.