Template talk:Christian-denomination-stub

This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

Christianity

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles

Picture

Does anyone think this template would look better with a pixture? The fish, Image:Ichthus.svg, from {{christianity-stub}} could work. Blarneytherinosaur talk 08:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template doesn't work

It adds some talk about Roman Catholicism, which looks really odd on a page supposedly about another church. It also adds a second ref line. I deleted it from the Congregational Union of Australia page and put it up for discussion on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 March 22. Aarghdvaark (talk) 02:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't add anything about Roman Catholicism. I'm not sure what you're seeing, but I'm not. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:49, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I spotted the problem at 05:37, 21 March 2013 and changed the Congregational Union of Australia page then. The problem was fixed by Johnmperry 11:10, 21 March 2013.[1] So you wouldn't have seen a problem. I've reinstated the stub in Congregational Union of Australia. Aarghdvaark (talk) 04:41, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 13 May 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove

<noinclude>
{{pp-template}}
</noinclude>

since protection levels are automatically sensed by {{asbox}}, which adds the necessary protection category and template. See, eg, Template:Law-firm-stub or Template:Law-stub. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done but @DannyS712: the protection level has been reduced, so you can edit directly. — xaosflux ^Talk 22:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]