Talk:Ya'qub ibn Tariq

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astrology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Distance to the sun

The article says that "Biruni tabulated ibn Tāriq's estimate for the greatest distance between the Earth and the Sun as 8,000 times the Earth radius" giving a translation of al-Biruni's Indica as a reference. But that text gives 8,000 as the figure for the distance to Mars, not to the Sun. The figures given there for the distance to the Sun are in the range of approx. 1,100 to approx. 2,100. I don't have any other sources to hand to check on this right now, but I'll see what I can dig up, especially given the additional claim that this was "the largest known estimate for the astronomical unit up until that time": I have the impression that al-Biruni made a separate determination of this figure, which this claim might be referring to? –Syncategoremata (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Planetary diameters

I expanded the discussion of ibn Tariq's estimates of planetary diameters to give his estimates for the diameters of the other celestial bodies. I also removed the comparison of his figures with modern measurements. The reason for this is that, as only two different diameters appear (one four times the other), these diameters would appear to come from his cosmographical theory, and not from experiment. Indeed even his estimate for the diameter of the Moon is wildly inaccurate, although it was roughly known at the time. So, it seems misleading to say that he got the diameter of Jupiter and Saturn almost right, when it looks to be just a numerical coincidence. Spacepotato (talk) 04:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for looking at this: I had started but became distracted. Your analysis here matches (but far improves on) what I had been groping towards when I was trying to work out what was going with his figures.

All the best. –Syncategoremata (talk) 20:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curious where this article stands

I was looking at this article and I noticed it has a lot of room for improvement. However, I was wanting to ask about the cause of the number of gaps. Is it a matter of not enough people working on it, or is it a matter of everyone having trouble finding sources that actually discuss the topic? Albkvz (talk) 16:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had also noticed quite a few of the sources are very old, two of which being from 1870 and 1900, respectively. I think the Journal of Near Eastern studies might also be worth looking into to find more recent published articles. Would it be possible to restructure the citation section to have more specific citations? 131.151.252.124 (talk) 16:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]