Talk:Wu Hen

Wu Hen has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 25, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wu Hen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Since you have two album nominees pending, it is only fair for me to take this on! --K. Peake 10:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving it a look 😁 웃O O 14:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

100cellsman Thank you for the initial response; you have missed a few points, which I have addressed below as well as providing further comments! --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Target R&B to Contemporary R&B

Not done --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change electronic dance to EDM in the infobox because the source calls the album "electronic dance music", which is another way of saying the genre EDM

Not done I meant list the genre as EDM

Remove wikilink on studio album
"The album is believed to define" → "It is considered to define" since he himself said it
Jazz should not start with capitalisation
Change electronic dance to EDM per earlier comment

Not done --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the first paragraph is fine, but you should write about the shifts and traditional jazz info in the comp section since it is only mentioned in reception currently

I changed it to include the other genres mentioned instead. 웃O O 22:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That actually looks a lot better, great job! --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"was announced with" → "was announced simultaneously with"

Not done --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The former track" → "The second of the three tracks"

Not done this is to specify which "former" track is being referred to --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"received generally favorable reviews" → "received generally favourable reviews" because this is an English article

Not done the article is in British English, remember --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target music critics to Music journalism
"drift from the Black Focus (2016) sounds that" → "drift from the sounds of its predecessor, Black Focus (2016), that"
"said that the album shifted its ideas too urgently." → said the album's ideas shifted too urgently." to be less wordy
"number 2 in the Jazz & Blues Albums chart" → "number 2 on the Jazz & Blues Albums Chart"
"in the Independent Albums chart." → "on the Independent Albums Chart." with the target

Partly done you missed the target --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. 웃O O 22:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Background

Retitle to Background and recording
Add at the end of the quote it was Williams talking about the album
The first and second para should be swapped to order this section correctly
"wrote that the album" → "wrote that Wu Hen"
"said that Wu Hen is" → "said that it is"
"Williams also expressed his" → "He also expressed his"

Not done --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The album title is named after the nickname his" → "Wu Hen is named after the nickname Williams'"

Not done --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"gave him, and is a" → "gave him and is a"

Not done --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"in France, "1989", after" → "in France, while "1989" is named after"
"who played in" → "who played on"
In the new order, the third para should be merged with what will be swapped to the second para
Remove wikilink on saxophone
Remove target on drummer
"bassist Rick Leon James, and" → "James on bass and" since the article is in British English

Partly done you forgot to remove the comma --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"to perform in the album," → "to perform on Wu Hen,"

Partly done you missed the title --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target lock-down isolation to COVID-19 lockdowns

All done 웃O O 22:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

Change hip hop to hip-hop for consistency
"and electronic dance which" → "and EDM which" per the source, as it says the album is "electronic dance music" and that is EDM
"genre experimentation… Wu Hen" → "genre experimentation[...] Wu Hen" since that is how ellipsis are used to cut parts out of quotes
"through Atwood-Ferguson and Bzhezinska's" → "through Miguel Atwood-Ferguson and Alina Bzhezinska's" since it is fine to write full names if directly quoting a source
"from Paul and Mason"." → "from Greg Paul and Quinn Mason."" per MOS:QUOTE
Mention the lengths of the audio samples on their text
On the first sample, target traditional jazz to trad jazz
On the second sample, remove the introduction to "Mr. Wu" being a track and target club music to Electronic dance music
"The album begins with" → "Wu Hen begins with"
Target Ravel to Maurice Ravel
Italicise Afternoon of a Faun
Target bluesy to Blues
"carries it out."" → "carries it out"."
"does not play on that track," → "does not play on the track,"
"where the bass" → "where James' bass"
"compared to that of" → "being compared to the material of"
"The first half of" → "The first half of the track sees"
"its bass playing" → "its bass playing that was"
"continues that same concept," → "continues the same concept,"
"of Jamiroquai,[2] and" → "of Jamiroquai and" moving [2] to the end of the sentence
Wikilink avant-garde
"It was meant to" → "The song was meant to"
Remove target on house
"track that has" → "song that has" to avoid repetitive wording
The Fader also mentions the song's drumming; write about that
Target soul to Soul music
"Its lyrics are written by Williams, and is" → "The song's lyrics were written by Williams and are"
"The album closes with" → "Wu Hen closes with"

Release and reception

Move the album ratings template to starting in the critical response sub-section, as no reviews are listed out until then
"announced for release, coinciding with the premiere" → "was announced for release, coinciding with the premiere of"
Remove ninth and eight track introductions since it is not relevant to their separate premiere dates
"on 24 July under" → "on 24 July 2020 under"
"number 2 in the Jazz & Blues Albums chart," → "number 2 on the Jazz & Blues Albums Chart,"
"*"in the Independent Albums chart." → "on the Independent Albums Chart." with the target
"it entered the album charts at 64" → "Wu Hen entered the Scottish Singles Chart at number 64" with the target

Critical response

"met with "generally favorable reviews" from critics." → "met with generally favourable reviews from music critics." with the target
Target weighted average to Weighted arithmetic mean
"this release received an" → "the album received an"
"was "the first" → "is "the first"
"was too similar to" → "is too similar to Yussef Kamaal's"
"said that "Wu Hen" → "said, "Wu Hen"
"writes that "there's" → "wrote that "there's"
"just a producer."" → "just a producer"."
"by Jack Bray of The Line of Best Fit, writing: "[Wu Hen]" → "by Bray, who wrote: "[Wu Hen]"
"occasionally felt jarring"." → "occasionally felt jarring.""

Year-end lists

Wu Hen should be italicised
"in Rough Trade Records' year end list." → "on Rough Trade Records' year end list for 2020."
"was ranked at 24" → "was ranked at number 24"
"with Dean van Nguyen writing: "Wu Hen mnages" → "with Dean Van Nguyen writing: "Wu Hen manages"
"that he cruises"." → "that he cruises.""
Wikilink Piccadilly Records per MOS:LINK2SECT

Track listing

Add a source to back up the writing credits
See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Personnel

Are you sure the order is correct here; shouldn't design and photography personnel come last?

Charts

Good

Notes

in the album → on the album

References

Copyvio score looks too high at 47.9%; fix quoting for The Line of Best Fit review to fix this
Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
Cite Apple Music as publisher instead for ref 2 with the wikilink and remove from the title
Target Pitchfork to Pitchfork (magazine) on ref 3 and fix MOS:QWQ issues
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 10 and cite middle name in the first name parameter instead to avoid confusion
Why is ref 12 titled Clash Magazine Review when it's from Crack?
Remove target on Pitchfork for ref 15
Target Complex to Complex (magazine) on ref 17 per MOS:LINK2SECT and fix MOS:QWQ issues
Use refnames from the chart table instead for refs 18, 19 and 20
Target Rough Trade to Rough Trade Records on ref 23

Final comments and verdict

~~These are my opening comments; expect the rest tomorrow! --K. Peake 22:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but good luck with this short article! --K. Peake 11:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll probably be busy the next couple days so I might not be able to fix everything at once. 웃O O 16:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

100cellsman That is fine; the onhold period is for a week anyway. --K. Peake 17:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake All the issues should be fixed now, let me know if I missed anything again. Though I had the personnel listed in alphabetical order. 웃O O 03:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

100cellsman Wow that was quicker than I expected; I fixed some areas where you got somewhat mixed up with copy editing and also resolved a number of issues that arose elsewhere. ✓ Pass now, the copyvio score is at around 45% but that is due to a part from the source that is quoted from an entirely different one. --K. Peake 06:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]