Talk:Woody Allen sexual abuse allegation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Woody Allen sexual abuse allegation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 January 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by .

Relevance or pertinence of Farrow's lawyer's statement

Someone added this statement to the paragraph about Coates, Mia Farrow, and Woody Allen: "Farrow's lawyer accused Coates of gullibility for having accepted Allen's version of events".

There is nothing factual about Coates' alleged 'gullibility'. Not even about her 'accepting Allen's version of events'.

As paid attorneys routinely attempt to discredit adverse parties during trials, I don't find the above statement noteworthy, relevant or pertinent, and I suggest removing it. Mcouzijn (talk) 11:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Worth noting that the source given doesn't even contain the content claimed, or anything else of significance. It's essentially "Lawyer cross-examines doctor". Captainllama (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! We are of the same mind.Mcouzijn (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]