Talk:WWF Hasbro action figures

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• WWE action figures
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:WWE action figures

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	WWF Hasbro action figures is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

...Bad

Whoever wrote this article doesn't understand Wikipedia's format too well. The article name should be the actual name of the WWF figure line not "WWF Hasbro Action Figures." And even if it were to be called what it currently is, "action figures" should not be capitalized.

WWF or WWE?

Everything here that refers to WWF should be changed to WWE, no?141.189.251.1 (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, not names that were never changed. This is an older product that was released long before the May 2002 name change.

Figures without prototypes

If a prototype was never released, then a source should be stated for when these figures were to be released? A document would be fine. This article is very misleading and speculative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.230.218 (talk) 02:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]