Talk:Uncle Grandpa
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uncle Grandpa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Speedy
[edit]Note to closing admin: the copyvio is deeper in the history since the article was recently copyedited. See this revision. czar · · 05:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Reception
[edit]Would there be enough reviews and/or ratings out by this point to add a reception section? Alphius (talk) 23:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
GENRES?
[edit]Are these genres accurate if so for each one why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.122.12 (talk) 21:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Writers sorted in descending order based on..what?!
[edit]Luigi1090, your edit summary here is confusing: "The point is that all the writers are sorted in descending order based on the number of episodes from their worked." 1) Where at MOS:TV or Template:Infobox television is this sort of bizarre ordering indicated as being preferable? 2) This style contravenes WP:OR and WP:UNDUE. It's not up to you to count how many times somebody has written for the series and then place them more prominently in the list based on your made-up ordering scheme. 3) Even if you were justified in doing this, there's no indication in the template for why they are ordered a certain way, which means that nobody could be reasonably expected to understand how the writers are ordered. I'm changing the list to coincide with the instructions at Template:Infobox television, which states that the parameter should not be used if there are more than 5 writers. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Errors
[edit]Someone needs to take a look at the page and fix it. It's bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.196.29.135 (talk) 04:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is run by volunteers. If you see something in need of fixing, fix it. Please be sure to include sources to support any additional information. See Referencing for Beginners to learn how. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]I've redirected two episode articles I created last year (first, second) to this page. Re-reading them now I don't think the sources cited in the article indicate notability. Coverage is mostly limited to short reviews, sometimes in tabloids, and rehashed plot summary (feel free to revert if you want specific examples). I've moved some info about those articles into a "Specials" section in this article. 23W 06:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- What about putting "slouching on the couch" in the article? 2804:389:A118:A909:0:1F:4F9:EB01 (talk) 22:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Was OJ innocent?
[edit]The common consensus is that OJ Simpson was guilty, but was he really? 72.48.79.223 (talk) 02:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Start-Class Cartoon Network articles
- High-importance Cartoon Network articles
- Wikipedia requested images of Cartoon Network
- WikiProject Cartoon Network articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Start-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- Start-Class Animated television articles
- Low-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles