Talk:Theodora Porphyrogenita

Theodora Porphyrogenita has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 27, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 13, 2018.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Theodora was dragged from a monastery and forced to become Empress of the Byzantine Empire against her will?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 11, 2009, January 11, 2011, August 31, 2011, January 11, 2013, January 11, 2014, January 11, 2016, January 11, 2017, January 11, 2020, January 11, 2022, and January 11, 2023.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Greece: Byzantine Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roman and Byzantine emperors Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Theodora Porphyrogenita (11th century)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 14:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this in a few days. auntieruth (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gog the Mild Minor tweaks to grammar etc. Please review. auntieruth (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntieruth55: Looks good. A couple of minor counter tweaks.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Removed unreliable references

@Gog the Mild: I've removed all references using Canduci, as he is an unreliable source. Pinging you so that you can replace citations/remove content where needed. I've replaced all with citation needed tags, so it should be easy to find them. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

III?

Who came up with this bizarre idea? She was the only Theodora who ruled as a full ruler, not a consort. And with sister Zoe one of only two full ruler empresses. Irene/Eirene was a usurper, others with great power, like Pulcheria, were Regents. Middle More Rider (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It seems to have been renamed several months ago with no discussion on the talk page; should somebody simply move it back? Katechon08 (talk) 08:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Middle More Rider and Katechon08: is the '11th century' qualifier even necessary? Theodora Porphyrogenita currently redirects to Theodora (daughter of Constantine VII), but the article doesn't say she had that epithet. Avilich (talk) 20:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the number back with sources (in a note) - it should be mentioned since it's used from time to time but it should not be the title of the article. I agree with Avilich that the '(11th century)' qualifier is not necessary since this is by far the most well-known Theodora Porphyrogenita. Ichthyovenator (talk) 12:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Non-controversial move. (non-admin closure) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theodora Porphyrogenita (11th century) → Theodora Porphyrogenita – Theodora Porphyrogenita currently redirects to Theodora (daughter of Constantine VII), where this designation is not even mentioned. This Theodora is a far more well-known figure (just compare the page views) and is usually the figure meant with "Theodora Porphyrogenita". Ichthyovenator (talk) 12:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Makes sense to me. Tisnec (talk) 04:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This could probably have been a technical move request; once the seven-day period is over I'll close this and round-robin them (unfortunately a bot fix prevents me from just overwriting the redirect). Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.