Talk:The One (shopping centre)

Hong Kong Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (296)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,514) • Stub-Class articles (6,679)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (379) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,338)

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 25 June 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per general consensus. Disambiguating necessary per WP:NOTPRIMARYTOPIC. --QEDK (愛) 19:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The request to rename this article to The One (shopping centre) has been carried out.

The ONE → The One (shopping centre) – "ONE" is not an acronym so it should not be capitalized in the article title per MOS:TM. f e minist 10:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:NATURAL. Let's not use overly long disambiguation when we don't have to. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:MOSTM The Standard Tycoon Joseph Lau Luen-hung has given his private property The One - a top commercial site in Tsim Sha Tsui worth about HK$18 billion - to his wife Kimbie Chan Hoi-wan and their children. also http://www.nextstophongkong.com/the-one/ etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above--John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 06:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support – removing the promotional MOS:ALLCAPS styling is desirable. Wikipedia should strive to be independent of the subjects that it describes, and should not try to replicate logos and promotional sytling. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support move per nom and relevant policy. ONR (talk) 02:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, the manual of style isn't policy. The only policy cited has been WP:NATURAL, which would be against this proposal, not for it. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TITLETM is policy, and it supports MOS:TM and favors this move. It even provides a very similar example with a two-word title in which the second word is three letters long and is all-caps in the stylized usage: Invader ZIM → Invader Zim. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'm glad someone knows the difference between a guideline and policy. The key difference between your example and the one here is disambiguation. "Invader Zim" is unambiguous, "The One" is not. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is a difference. Whether it is a key difference or not is another matter. And when we are discussing whether some letters are capitalized or not (or similar matters typically involving MOS:TM / WP:TITLETM), I tend to draw a distinction between a name and the styling of the name, and I tend to have a strong distaste for all-caps when used purely for promotional styling purposes. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – "ONE" should not be capitalized solely because it's stylized that way, and the suggested title is fine. V2Blast (talk) 06:46, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

The AIR, L16, The ONE, Hong Kong - DSC 7111.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]