Jump to content

Talk:Mahavishnu Orchestra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I don't see any discussion of "My Goals Beyond" in the Mahavishnu Orchestra page. It featured Cobham and Goodman and is to my knowledge the first recording when McLaughlin began using the name "Mahavishnu John McLaughlin". I think it is worth a reference on this page. Chuckpwhite 06:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mahavishnu

[edit]

I really don't think that Mahavishnu stuff should be included w/ mahavishnu orchestra stuff, for the following reasons: 

   1)They are not hte same name
   2)Even if you consider the names close enough, heres why I think such should not be considered corrrect:
    Tho McLaughlin may have made many productions between the break up of the 1st Mahavishnu Orchestra, and the 2nd, none of them were real high profile.  Between 2nd Mahavishnu Orchestra, and Mahavishnu, however there is quite a high profile near career to consider.

Please reconsider this!

Please clarify that..? McYaballow (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:B00000252D.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg

[edit]

Image:B00000252D.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Inner.jpg

[edit]

Image:Inner.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Radiol.jpg

[edit]

Image:Radiol.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MahavishnuOrchestraApocalypseAlbumCover.jpg

[edit]

Image:MahavishnuOrchestraApocalypseAlbumCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mahaa.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mahaa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Former members' list

[edit]

I'd like to relabel this simply 'members', as 'former' gives the erroneous impression the band is still active, but I don't understand this bit of mark-up: when I remove 'past' from 'past_members', and realign, the list just disappears. Rothorpe (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mahavishnu Heavy Metal?

[edit]

Since when was Mahavishnu considered Heavy Metal? Although they have some concepts used in Heavy Metal, by the early 70's there were relatively few Hard Rock and Progressive Rock Bands, and the standard Aesthetics of Heavy Metal were starting to be introduced in the mid 70's, even Yngwie was considered a Rock guitarist by 1983. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.154.101.251 (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mahavishnu Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mahavishnu Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mahavishnu Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is "Q8"?

[edit]

Q8 is listed among the release formats (along with CD, vinyl, etc). What on earth is Q8? A google search didn't shed any light on this. 24.108.155.196 (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, finally found a reference somewhere. This appears to be Quadraphonic 8-track cartridge format. Well I've hotlinked "Q8" to the relevant section of the Quadraphonic Sound article. I've also hotlinked "CS" to the Cassette Tape article, in case it's not clear to some what CS means.

Honestly these format listings on this page are a bit of a mess. Normal stereo 8-track releases are not listed, and I believe The Inner Mounting flame was released on cassette and 8-track as well, but those aren't listed here. I, for one, question the value of listing the various formats anyway, but in any case, I do not have the energy to cross-reference and update every released format for every album. 24.108.155.196 (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Release date for The Inner Mounting Flame

[edit]

The stated release date of August 14, 1971 doesn't seem right. The separate article on the album lists August 14 as the RECORDING date, and November 3 as the release date. Neither date is cited. The album was reviewed in the December 11 issue of Billboard, suggesting that the November date is correct. The catalog number, Columbia 31067, doesn't fit in with Columbia August releases, but does fit with November releases. E.g. Byrds Farther Along, Columbia 31050, which we list as being released Nov. 17. Other online sites list August 1971 as either the recording month or the release month. Unfortunately I don't have any authoritative reference I can cite, so I don't really think I can change the date. PatConolly (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mahavishnu_Orchestra&oldid=1203845082"