This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
An image used in this article, File:Liberty stamp.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This is Robert S. Davidson, d/b/a Plastertech v. The United States, case 1:13-cv-00942-EGB, United States Court of Federal Claims. You can see the court documents for a fee (waived if you stay under the threshhold) at Pacer, but I will caution editors that the court records are not appropriate secondary sources for Wikipedia. It would be useful, however, to look there to find out what progress has been made since the case was filed 2 years ago. The latest (as of January 12, 2016) is an unopposed motion from the plaintiff to extend discovery, and they will have a status conference in April. So, the lack of news reports in the interim is correct, they have not settled and the court has not issued a judgement. -- ke4roh (talk) 02:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
